The Crisfield Housing Authority, Crisfield, MD, Did Not Properly Administer Its Public Housing Program Operating and Capital Funds
Evaluate the apparent conflict-of-interest situations in this report and pursue administrative sanctions if warranted.
Open Recommendation
The Crisfield Housing Authority, Crisfield, MD, Did Not Properly Administer Its Public Housing Program Operating and Capital Funds
Provide documentation to show that products and services totaling $171,822 were purchased at fair and reasonable prices. For any amounts determined to be unreasonable and not supported, the Authority should reimburse the program from non-Federal funds.
Open Recommendation
The Crisfield Housing Authority, Crisfield, MD, Did Not Properly Administer Its Public Housing Program Operating and Capital Funds
Reimburse its program $170,784 from non-Federal funds for the ineligible salary payments and ongoing security payments.
Open Recommendation
The Crisfield Housing Authority, Crisfield, MD, Did Not Properly Administer Its Public Housing Program Operating and Capital Funds
Develop and implement controls over its procurement actions to ensure that prices paid for goods and services are reasonable.
Open Recommendation
The Crisfield Housing Authority, Crisfield, MD, Did Not Properly Administer Its Public Housing Program Operating and Capital Funds
Develop and implement controls to ensure that program funds are used for eligible activities only.
Open Recommendation
The Cumberland Plateau Regional Housing Authority, Lebanon, VA, Did Not Procure Services in Accordance With HUD Requirements
Based on the outcome of the State’s investigation and criminal trial, make a referral to HUD recommending administrative sanctions, as appropriate, up to and including debarment of the Authority’s former rehabilitation specialist, the Planning District Commission’s former deputy director, and the Read More
Open Recommendation
Cypress Meadows Assisted Living, Antioch, CA, Was Not Administered in
Accordance With Its Regulatory Agreement and HUD Requirements
Determine legal sufficiency and if legally sufficient, pursue civil and administrative remedies against Cypress Meadows, LLC; Skyline Crest Enterprises, LLC; the project’s owner; or all three for inappropriately disbursing funds in violation of the project’s regulatory agreement, operating lease Read More
Open Recommendation
Cypress Meadows Assisted Living, Antioch, CA, Was Not Administered in
Accordance With Its Regulatory Agreement and HUD Requirements
Pursue appropriate civil money penalties and administrative actions, up to and including debarment, against Cypress Meadows LLC; Skyline Crest Enterprises LLC; the project’s owner; or all three for violating the project’s regulatory agreement, operating lease agreement, and HUD requirements.
Open Recommendation
Cypress Meadows Assisted Living, Antioch, CA, Was Not Administered in
Accordance With Its Regulatory Agreement and HUD Requirements
Repay the project from non-project funds $263,289 for ineligible salary expenses.
Open Recommendation
Cypress Meadows Assisted Living, Antioch, CA, Was Not Administered in
Accordance With Its Regulatory Agreement and HUD Requirements
Remove $283,307 in ineligible accrued salary fees payable from its financial statements and records and ensure that these expenses are not accrued or paid for with project funds.
Open Recommendation
Cypress Meadows Assisted Living, Antioch, CA, Was Not Administered in
Accordance With Its Regulatory Agreement and HUD Requirements
Repay the project from non-project funds $110,710 for ineligible offsite accounting expenses.
Open Recommendation
Cypress Meadows Assisted Living, Antioch, CA, Was Not Administered in
Accordance With Its Regulatory Agreement and HUD Requirements
Remove $129,416 in ineligible accrued offsite accounting fees payable from its financial statements and records and ensure that these expenses are not accrued or paid for with project funds.
Open Recommendation
Cypress Meadows Assisted Living, Antioch, CA, Was Not Administered in
Accordance With Its Regulatory Agreement and HUD Requirements
Repay the project from non-project funds $99,160 for ineligible personal health insurance expenses of the owner.
Open Recommendation
Cypress Meadows Assisted Living, Antioch, CA, Was Not Administered in
Accordance With Its Regulatory Agreement and HUD Requirements
Repay the project from non-project funds $4,179 for excessive bank fees.
Open Recommendation
Cypress Meadows Assisted Living, Antioch, CA, Was Not Administered in
Accordance With Its Regulatory Agreement and HUD Requirements
Repay the project from non-project funds $1,352 for expenses related to the identity-of-interest hair salon.
Open Recommendation
Cypress Meadows Assisted Living, Antioch, CA, Was Not Administered in
Accordance With Its Regulatory Agreement and HUD Requirements
Obtain approval from HUD for a lease agreement with the hair salon.
Open Recommendation
Cypress Meadows Assisted Living, Antioch, CA, Was Not Administered in
Accordance With Its Regulatory Agreement and HUD Requirements
Provide documentation to support that $65,232 in disbursements was used on reasonable and necessary operating expenses or repay the project from non-project funds.
Open Recommendation
Cypress Meadows Assisted Living, Antioch, CA, Was Not Administered in
Accordance With Its Regulatory Agreement and HUD Requirements
Pay the project $620,937 in uncollected rent from non-project funds.
Open Recommendation
Cypress Meadows Assisted Living, Antioch, CA, Was Not Administered in
Accordance With Its Regulatory Agreement and HUD Requirements
Pay the project from non-project funds $162,462 in lease agreement charges not deposited into Cypress Meadows’ bank account.
Open Recommendation
Cypress Meadows Assisted Living, Antioch, CA, Was Not Administered in
Accordance With Its Regulatory Agreement and HUD Requirements
Remove Skyline Crest Enterprises, LLC, as the operator and replace it with a HUD-approved independent operator.
Open Recommendation