The Offices of Audit and Evaluation supervise and conduct independent and objective audits, evaluations, and other reviews of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) programs and activities to ensure they operate economically, efficiently, and effectively. This page contains links to our audit and evaluation reports and memoranda.
The Harrisburg Housing Authority, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Did Not Properly Administer Its Low-Rent Public Housing Program
September 26, 2007
Report
#2007-PH-1013
The Wilmington Housing Authority, Wilmington, North Carolina, Did Not Follow HUD Requirements for Its Nonprofit Development Activities
September 25, 2007
Report
#2007-AT-1011
Cook County, Illinois Home Investment Partnerships Program, Chicago, IL, The County Lacked Adequate Controls over Its Program
September 25, 2007
Report
#2007-CH-1015
Peoria Housing Authority Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program, Peoria, IL, The Authority Did Not Effectively Administer Its Program
September 23, 2007
Report
#2007-CH-1014
Sitting Bull College, Fort Yates, ND, Generally Met Requirements While Administering Its Tribal Colleges and Universities Program Assistance Award
September 03, 2007
Report
#2007-DE-1007
Holyoke Housing Authority, Holyoke, MA Needs to Improve Its Internal Controls over the Voucher Program, Cost Allocations and Transfers
We audited the Housing Choice Voucher program (Voucher program) at the Holyoke Housing Authority (Authority) as part of our fiscal year 2007 annual audit plan. The objective of the audit was to determine whether the Authority administered the Voucher program in accordance with its annual contributions contracts and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements. Our efforts focused on whether the Authority…
August 28, 2007
Report
#2007-BO-1008
The State of Maryland Did Not Always Administer Its Homeownership Assistance Program in Accordance with Federal Regulations and Written Agreements
August 26, 2007
Report
#2007-PH-1012
The City of Fall River, MA, Generally Administered Its Block Grant and HOME Programs in Accordance with HUD Requirements
We reviewed the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) programs administered by the Community Development Agency, City of Fall River, Massachusetts (City) as part of our annual audit plan.
Our audit objective was to determine whether the City administered its CDBG and HOME programs in compliance with U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements. We focused on whether…
August 23, 2007
Report
#2007-BO-1007
The Hoboken Housing Authority, Hoboken, New Jersey, Requires Improved Controls Over Its Capital Fund Program and Cash Disbursement Process
What We Audited and Why
Based on an Office of Inspector General (OIG) risk analysis, we audited the Hoboken Housing Authority's (Authority) Public Housing Capital Fand (capital fund) program and its disbursement process. The audit objectives were to determine whether (1) the Authority administrated its capital grant program in accordance with applicable U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) laws and regulations and (…
August 17, 2007
Report
#2007-NY-1011
St. Clair County Housing Authority, Belleville, Illinois, Did Not Properly Calculate Housing Assistance Payments
August 16, 2007
Report
#2007-KC-1007
The Cathedral Foundation of Jacksonville, FL, Used More Than $2.65 Million in Project Funds for Questioned Costs
We audited the Cathedral Foundation of Jacksonville, Inc. (Foundation), concerning its involvement as owner and/or manager of four elderly multifamily housing projects (projects) located in Jacksonville, Florida. We conducted the audit based on a request from the Jacksonville Multifamily Housing Hub, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Jacksonville, Florida. Our audit objective was to determine whether the…
August 13, 2007
Report
#2007-AT-1010
The State of Utah Did Not Comply with HOME Investment Partnerships Program Requirements
August 09, 2007
Report
#2007-DE-1006
The Plymouth Housing Commission, Plymouth, Michigan, Needs to Improve Its Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program Administration
August 02, 2007
Report
#2007-CH-1012
Multifamily Project Deficiencies Resulted in More Than $730,000 in Cost Exceptions for Moosup Gardens Apartments, Moosup, Connecticut
We audited the records for Moosup Gardens Apartments (project), a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)-insured multifamily project in response to a request from HUD. Our audit objective was to determine whether the project's costs were accurately reported to HUD and in accordance with the regulatory agreement and HUD's requirements.
We identified questioned costs and opportunities for funds to be put to better use…
July 24, 2007
Report
#2007-BO-1006