Consider enhancing the SMART system, by adding fields (a) requiring FHA’s loan servicing contractor to enter the amount on the original mortgage and promissory note and (b) calculating the difference between the partial claim amount in SMART and the amount entered from the documents.

Implement an enhanced review process to ensure the receipt of partial claim documents is accurately marked in SMART so that the Missing Documents Report will be accurate.

Determine which report accurately reflects the status of partial claims without original documentation, certify the completeness and accuracy of the identified report, and provide the report to the General Ledger Division for the reclassification entry.

• A change control protocol for changes in programs, policies, existing controls, and source documents, including impact assessments and approvals.
• Cross-functional review involving the policy, program, accounting, financial reporting, and compliance teams before any changes are finalized.
• Documentation of rationale and expected financial impact for each change.
• Training and  awareness for management on the importance of following the governance framework for change management. 

Record journal entries to reclassify the HECM cases with missing original first notes for more than 90 days from loans receivable to accounts receivable.
 

Ensure the report provided by the NSC to reclassify partial claims from loans receivable to account receivable is appropriate for financial reporting and document the decision.
 

Implement quality control checks that reconcile financial statement disclosure amounts to the general ledger and other supporting documentation as part of the financial statements review and approval process.
 

Update its QC plan and related processes and procedures to align with requirements for loan selection, including documenting how loan selections were determined.

Update its QC plan and related processes and procedures to align with requirements for (1) loan file reviews, including requirements to reverify borrower information, obtain appraisal field reviews, and complete reviews in a timely manner; (2) assessment of findings; (3) reporting findings internally and documenting response to findings; (4) mitigation of findings; and (5) reporting findings to HUD when required.

Provide annual training to its staff and management on HUD requirements for lender QC programs and provide proof of training to HUD.

Review the 101 EPD loans not previously selected for review and submit the results to HUD, including any findings of fraud, material misrepresentations, or other material findings that it is unable to mitigate. If required, Neighborhood Loans should execute indemnification agreements or reimburse claims paid to help protect the FHA insurance fund from unacceptable risk.

Review its QC files for up to the 432 loans with post-closing reviews in which it may not have performed complete reverifications of borrower information and reverify information where appropriate. Neighborhood Loans should then evaluate the risk of any new findings identified, and if required, it should execute indemnification agreements or reimburse claims paid to help protect the FHA insurance fund from unacceptable risk.

Evaluate its QC files for the 59 loans with EPD reviews in which it did not assess the risk of findings identified to confirm whether it self-reported to HUD all findings of fraud or material misrepresentation, along with any other material findings that its records did not show had been acceptably mitigated. If required, Neighborhood Loans should execute indemnification agreements or reimburse claims paid to help protect the FHA insurance fund from unacceptable risk.

Evaluate its QC files for the 96 loans in which it identified material findings to confirm whether it self-reported to HUD all findings of fraud or material misrepresentation, along with any other material findings that its records did not show have been acceptably mitigated. If required, Neighborhood Loans should execute indemnification agreements or reimburse claims paid to help protect the FHA insurance fund from unacceptable risk.

Provide indemnification agreements or documentation to support the one loan in which it missed material deficiencies and the three loans in which it identified material misrepresentations or other material findings that it did not acceptably mitigate or self-report to HUD. Implementation of this recommendation will protect the FHA insurance fund from an estimated loss of $339,186.

Implement a process, in conjunction with the Office of Recapitalization, to ensure that the reserve for replacement requirements in HUD’s business documents, such as the RAD conversion commitment, HAP contract, and operating agreement, are consistent for converted projects.

Update its QC plan and related processes and procedures to align with requirements for loan selection, including maintaining data and documenting how sample sizes and loan selections were determined.

Update its QC plan and related processes and procedures to align with requirements for (1) loan file reviews, including requirements to obtain new credit reports, reverify borrower information, and obtain appraisal field reviews; (2) documenting review results, including maintaining data on findings; (3) assessment of findings; (4) mitigation of findings; (5) reporting findings internally to lender management; and (6) reporting findings to HUD when required.

Provide annual training to its staff and management on HUD requirements for lender QC programs and provide proof of training to HUD.

Review the six EPD loans not previously selected for review and submit the results to HUD, including all findings of fraud or material misrepresentation, along with any other material findings that it is unable to mitigate. If required, Flat Branch should execute indemnification agreements or reimburse claims paid to help protect the FHA insurance fund from unacceptable risk.