U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Export
Date Issued

Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2020-KC-1001-001-F

    Ensure that Englewood Apartments’ owner and its identity-of-interest management agent provide necessary oversight to its onsite staff.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2020-KC-1001-002-A

    Require Englewood Apartments’ owner to further develop a formalized process to use when running and reviewing EIV reports.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2020-KC-1001-002-B

    Require Englewood Apartments’ owner to ensure that the management agent and staff complete EIV training to ensure that staff members understand their duties and both HUD’s and Englewood Apartments’ own requirements.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2020-KC-1001-002-C

    Monitor Englewood Apartments to ensure that it properly runs and reviews the EIV reports.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2020-KC-1001-002-D

    Ensure that Englewood Apartments’ owner and its identity-of-interest management agent provide necessary oversight to its onsite staff.

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2020-PH-1001-001-A
    $860,132
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Provide documentation to show that the proposal of the vendor that it selected and paid $860,132 was the most advantageous or reimburse its program from non-Federal funds for any amounts that it cannot support.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2020-PH-1001-001-B

    Develop and implement controls to monitor its agent to ensure that it procures products and services in accordance with applicable Federal procurement requirements.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2020-PH-1001-001-C
    $156,675
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Reimburse its program $156,675 from non-Federal funds for the ineligible payments it made due to the conflict-of-interest situation identified by the audit.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2020-PH-1001-001-D

    Develop and implement controls to ensure that it obtains waivers from HUD before entering into agreements that create conflict-of-interest situations.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2020-PH-1001-001-E

    Provide training and technical assistance to the Authority to ensure that it understands the proper use of intergovernmental agreements in accordance with HUD requirements.

Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2020-CH-0002-001-A

    Continue testing the financial and credit history variables, including default data, and include the appropriate reliable and sufficient variables for the cash flow model used to estimate and reestimate the credit subsidy for the cohorts of mortgages within the Section 232 program.

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2020-BO-1002-001-A
    $916,132
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Support that $916,132 spent on contracts was fair and reasonable in accordance with Federal requirements or repay the Operating Fund or Capital Fund program from non-Federal funds any amount that cannot be supported.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2020-BO-1002-001-B
    $408,968
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Support that $408,968 in funds not yet spent on contracts would be fair and reasonable or reallocate the funds to ensure that they will be put to their intended use.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2020-BO-1002-001-C

    Reprocure any contracts for which cost reasonableness cannot be supported and contracts were not properly awarded to ensure compliance with HUD requirements.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2020-BO-1002-001-D

    Ensure that all Authority staff members working with procurements and contract administration receive Federal procurement training.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2020-BO-1002-001-E

    Establish and implement adequate record-keeping procedures to comply with Federal procurement requirements, including a checklist for the file to ensure that they complete all procurement requirements and receive all required documents.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2020-BO-1002-001-F

    Ensure that all architectural and engineering contracts or task orders awarded during our audit period are reviewed for cost reasonableness.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2020-BO-1002-002-A
    $37,941
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Repay the Operating Fund program from non-Federal funds for the $37,941 in ineligible costs when the amount paid exceeded the contract value.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2020-BO-1002-002-B

    Establish and implement adequate controls so the Authority does not exceed the contract amount without appropriate contract amendments and written approvals.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2020-BO-1002-002-C

    Establish and implement adequate controls to obtain all of the required project completion documentation prior to final payment.