U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Export
Date Issued

Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-DE-1003-001-A

    Develop and implement controls over owner contributions and owner distributions to ensure compliance with its regulatory agreement and HUD regulations.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-DE-1003-001-B

    Complete HUD-approved training regarding owner contributions and distributions.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-DE-1003-001-C
    $15,000
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Repay its project’s operating account for the ineligible $15,000 disbursement from non-project funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-DE-1003-002-A

    Perform an analysis of all security deposits and ensure that the security deposit account is fully funded.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-DE-1003-002-B

    Implement controls to ensure existing procedures are followed to maintain the project’s security deposit funds separately from all other accounts by depositing and disbursing all security deposit funds directly into and from the security deposit account.

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-BO-1007-001-A
    $2,679,580
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Support that $2,533,377 in costs were reasonable and allowable program expenses in accordance with requirements or repay from non-Federal funds the appropriate programs any amounts they cannot support.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-BO-1007-001-B
    $1,625,391
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Repay the appropriate programs from non-Federal funds the $1,524,604 in ineligible funds paid when costs exceeded contract terms.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-BO-1007-001-C
    $1,242,154
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Determine the appropriateness of the remaining balance of $1,242,154 on unsupported contracts to ensure costs were reasonable, reprocure the subject contracts, or reallocate the funds to the appropriate program.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-BO-1007-001-D
    $375,526
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Reprocure expired service contracts to ensure estimated balances of $375,526 are used on eligible contract.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-BO-1007-001-E

    Reprocure any service contracts necessary and ensure that the contracts are properly awarded in accordance with HUD requirements.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-BO-1007-001-F

    Strengthen and implement controls and procedures over procurement, including monitoring consultants, to ensure that procurement activities meet HUD requirements.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-BO-1007-001-G

    Establish and implement an effective system to ensure that payments do not exceed approved contract values.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-BO-1007-001-H

    Establish and implement an effective system to maintain a complete and accurate contract register to ensure proper contract planning and administration.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-BO-1007-001-I

    Provide technical assistance to the Authority to ensure that responsible staff and board members receive necessary procurement training.

Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1801-001-A
    $423,759
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Work with HUD to nullify the restrictions on conveyance that violate HUD policy or indemnify HUD. This action will protect HUD against future losses of $418,277 for the eight loans.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1801-001-B
    $5,482
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Repay HUD $5,482 for partial claims paid on two FHA loans that contained prohibited restrictive covenants.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1801-001-C

    Develop and implement policies and procedures to identify prohibited restrictions on conveyance to ensure that it does not originate FHA loans with prohibited restrictive covenants.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1801-001-D

    Provide training to its employees regarding HUD’s requirements related to prohibited restrictions on conveyance.

Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-NY-1011-001-A
    $178,811
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    We recommend that the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Single Family Housing require MB Financial to indemnify HUD against potential losses of $178,811 for the four loans that did not comply with underwriting requirements (appendix C). HUD provided us copies of the four executed indemnification agreements in August and September 2017. Therefore, upon issuance of this report, we will enter a management decision into HUD’s Audit Resolution and Corrective Action Tracking System, along with copies of the indemnification agreements, and close this recommendation.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-NY-1011-001-B

    We recommend that the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Single Family Housing require MB Financial to provide training to its underwriters on HUD’s underwriting requirements for approving and rejecting loans.