Conduct risk assessments in public housing without adequate lead-based paint inspection documentation to ascertain the existence of lead-based paint hazards.

Conduct lead-based paint inspections at public housing abated through removal methods where an abatement report is unavailable to ensure that units are “lead-free.”

Abate or implement interim control measures to reduce the risk of exposure to lead-based paint hazards identified through risk assessments.

Implement an ongoing maintenance program for lead-based paint to ensure unabated and “lead-safe” units remain hazard free.

Implement adequate policies and procedures regarding the management of lead-based paint in its public housing, including maintaining adequate records, completing interim controls, and conducting ongoing maintenance for lead-based paint hazards.

Ensure that it provides appropriate and accurate lead-based paint disclosures to prospective and current tenants.

Revise and update the Authority’s policies to ensure that environmental investigations are completed for EBLL cases and ensure that HUD and residents are notified of the results of environmental investigations in a timely manner.

Coordinate with HUD to provide training for the Authority’s employees on managing of lead-based paint hazards and to provide technical assistance such as developing written procedures, improving internal controls, or contracting with subject matter experts to address the issues cited in this report.

Provide evidence that it abated lead-based paint hazards in one EBLL case where the Authority did not abate the hazards identified in an environmental investigation.

Use the fraud risks and fraud schemes HUD OIG identified and involve relevant stakeholders to create a program-specific fraud risk inventory to support HUD’s anti-fraud efforts and enhance oversight of the Capital Fund program.

Communicate Capital Fund program fraud risks and schemes to all its stakeholders, including PHAs, to increase program effectiveness.

Determine whether data currently collected from PHAs can be leveraged to identify and mitigate fraud risks and consider whether any additional data needs to be collected or systems enhanced to mitigate fraud risks.

Systematically evaluate whether control deficiencies identified by the AIR program have affected the accuracy or completeness of HUD’s financial statements. This assessment should include: 
a) Review relevant financial statement line items, disclosure, and account balances for misstatements attributable to ineffective controls;
b) Document the evaluation results, including the rationale for conclusions regarding the presence or absence of misstatements;
c) Make correcting entries to September 30, 2025 balances, as appropriate;
d) Retain supporting analysis for both internal and external review; and
e) Leverage test of balances results to inform remediation efforts.

Work with program offices through remediation activities to determine the underlying causes of the control deficiencies identified by the AIR program.
 

Based on the causes identified, coordinate with the program offices through remediation activities to develop corrective action plans with defined milestones, responsible parties, and timelines. Progress should be tracked, documented, and periodically reported to senior management.
 

Require targeted, role-specific training for program office staff and managers in areas where deficiencies were identified, including approvals, segregation of duties, recordkeeping, and delegated authority. This training should reinforce the importance of compliance with internal control requirements and include HUD escalation and enforcement mechanisms.

Assess and address barriers to timely and adequate responses from program offices during AIR program internal control testing. This assessment should:
a) Identify recurring causes for delayed or incomplete responses from program offices and implement escalation protocols or incentives to ensure timely fulfillment of AIR program requests;
b) Identify and implement efficiencies in the testing process to optimize the time program offices spend on the AIR program, such as streamlining communication, clarifying expectations, finding alternatives to time consuming tasks, and optimizing scheduling;
c) Provide additional guidance, training, or resources to program offices as needed to improve the quality and timeliness of submissions; and
d) Monitor response rates and timeliness, reporting persistent issues to senior leadership for corrective action.

Re-examine and enhance HUD’s process for evaluating the potential financial impact of control deficiencies identified by the AIR program or other sources to ensure that:
a) Assessments of financial impact are initiated promptly upon identification of control deficiencies;
b) The evaluation process is structured to deliver clear, actionable conclusions in sufficient time to inform any necessary adjustments to financial statements prior to the financial report date; and
c) Documentation of the assessment process and results is maintained to support audit requirements and management’s assertions.
 

Coordinate with the Principal Deputy Assistance Secretary for each Program Office to:
a) Define governance protocols to include reassessing HUD’s escalation protocols and enforcement mechanisms for repeated or willful noncompliance with documented controls, such as additional oversight, retraining, or disciplinary action as appropriate. Based on the assessment, update those protocols and mechanisms, as warranted.
b) Establish and resource a HUD-wide centralized digital repository for artifacts and key supporting documentation to provide consistent documentation retention and accessibility. Based on this initiative, define governance protocols for repository use, including security, version control, timely review/update requirements, and periodic audits to validate compliance.
 

Implement procedures and controls for targeting non-FHA-insured RAD PBV projects to monitor the physical conditions and reserve for replacement accounts.