Review FMC’s final December 31, 2016, balances and update the PIH prepayment beginning balance accordingly.

Delegate responsibilities to the appropriate program office and assign risk owners to provide responses for the acceptance, mitigation, and elimination of risks identified in HUD’s ERM risk profile.

Develop, implement, and document internal controls in response to identified risks from HUD’s ERM risk profile in compliance with OMB Circular No. A-123, Management's Responsibility for Enterprise Risk Management and Internal Control.

Complete and issue final FERA policy to the Department and communicate the requirements within the policy to program offices in a timely manner.

Assign and communicate the responsibility of FERA policy implementation and oversight to ensure that program offices are performing FERAs on a routine and timely basis to ensure effectiveness and efficiency of operations at the HUD program level and compliance with HUD internal policy and procedure.

Assign and communicate the responsibility of the MCR program policy, implementation, and oversight to ensure that program offices routinely conduct reviews to support a compliant internal control framework.

Conduct the OOR more frequently than annually to ensure that all obligations are adequately reviewed and deobligations are processed by the end of the fiscal year

Develop departmental policy that outlines the open obligation review process, to include (1) internal controls, (2) timeframes, and (3) roles and responsibilities of OCFO, OCPO, and program offices. These policies must outline sufficient internal controls in place to ensure that the Secretary can certify that all of HUD’s obligations are valid as of the end of the fiscal year.

Update standard operating procedures on the departmentwide unliquidated obligations review to conduct a routine review of justifications provided by the program offices for retained obligations, while ensuring that they are for a bonafide need and to support the annual certification made by the Secretary on open obligations.

As part of the OOR process, conduct monitoring activities of obligations sent to OCPO for deobligation by developing a mechanism to routinely track the status, to include key information, such as but not limited to the owner (program), date transmitted to OCPO, point of contact, last contact date, and current status. OCFO should use this information to ensure that all information has been communicated among all parties involved to enable timely deobligation.

Implement a process to ensure that ongoing ADA violation investigations are properly documented as the investigation progresses to enable timely review of open cases.

Review the 17 travel cardholders with purchases that occurred without a travel authorization and the 6 travel cardholders with purchases that were not supported to determine whether the purchases were allowable, proper, and paid in full by the cardholder, taking appropriate administrative actions as necessary. These unsupported purchases totaled $6,407. However, a total of $5,780 remains after deducting the duplicate amount of $627 addressed in Recommendation 1C.

Perform an analysis of the 3,045 travel card purchases with indications that they were unauthorized or ineligible to identify potential violations and to address any unauthorized purchases identified. OCFO should perform a review of identified transactions to determine whether they were allowable, proper, and paid in full by the cardholder, taking appropriate administrative actions as necessary.

Refer the 15 ineligible travel card transactions totaling $5,393 to the appropriate program office and obtain a response regarding what administrative actions were taken to resolve the violations. If no actions were taken, OCFO should request support to show why no corrective actions were taken.

Strengthen internal monitoring efforts regarding government travel card use to identify potentially improper, illegal, or erroneous transactions. Such efforts should include data mining to detect instances of delinquency, fraud, and misuse.

Designate an unclaimed asset recovery official as required by the Treasury Financial Manual.

Work with Treasury to identify and obtain reimbursement for FHA’s and Ginnie Mae’s portion of the $1.9 million in HUD funds that Treasury collected.

Establish and implement policies and procedures to ensure that all of its unclaimed funds are claimed and the money is appropriately routed to put $2.2 million to better use. At a minimum, these policies and procedures should address what constitutes FHA and Ginnie Mae funds, ensure that these funds are returned to FHA or Ginnie Mae as appropriate, and include policies to claim co-owned funds with any appropriate thresholds or limitations.

We recommend that the Chief Financial Officer determine whether the summary expenditures totaling $160,360,714, which exceeded the grant round obligations for the two grantees, were ADA violations. If the transactions were violations, action should be taken as required by the ADA.

We recommend that the Chief Financial Officer determine whether the revised and completed detail transactions totaling to $435,263,268, which occurred before and after grant rounds obligation and expenditure dates, were ADA violations. If the transactions were violations, actions should be taken as required by the ADA.