The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Inspector General (OIG), assisted the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Washington, DC, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida in a civil investigation of Financial Freedom Acquisition, a division of CIT Bank, N.A. Financial Freedom was originally owned by IndyMac Bank until its failure in 2008, when the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation was appointed as conservator. On March 18, 2009, OneWest Bank, N.A., based in Pasadena, CA, acquired the assets of Financial Freedom. On August 3, 2015, CIT Group acquired OneWest Bank, including Financial Freedom. The home equity conversion mortgage (HECM) servicing operations for Financial Freedom were located in Austin, TX.
On May 16, 2017, Financial Freedom entered into a settlement agreement with the Federal Government to pay $68,274,944 to avoid the delay, uncertainty, inconvenience, and expense of lengthy litigation. Financial Freedom also had paid HUD more than $21,000,000 related to the covered conduct through HUD’s Supplemental Claims system, for a total settlement value of $89,274,944. The Federal Government alleged that Financial Freedom sought to obtain insurance payments for debenture interest from HUD and did not disclose on the insurance claim forms that the lender was not eligible for such interest payments. The settlement was neither an admission of liability by Financial Freedom nor a concession by the United States that its claims were not well founded.
As a result of Financial Freedom’s conduct, lenders on relevant HECMs obtained additional debenture interest that they were not entitled to receive. HUD incurred substantial losses when it paid additional debenture interest on HECM claims on the loans covered by the settlement agreement. Of the total $89,274,944 settlement, the Federal Housing Administration received $41 million, and the remaining amount was paid to other Federal entities.
Recommendations
General Counsel
- Status2017-CF-1804-001-AOpenClosed$41,000,000.00Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Closed on August 21, 2017Acknowledge that $41 million of the $89,274,944 in the attached settlement represents an amount due HUD, less DOJ’s civil debt collection fees.