U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Document

We audited the City of Atlanta, GA, and its subrecipient, the Fulton County-City of Atlanta Land Bank Authority.  We began our review of the City’s administration of its Neighborhood Stabilization Programs 1 (NSP1) and 3 (NSP3) grants because it aligns with our goal in the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Inspector General’s annual audit plan to improve HUD’s execution of and accountability for grant funds.  Our audit objective was to determine whether the City of Atlanta administered the NSP1 and NSP3 grants of its subrecipient, the Fulton County-City of Atlanta Land Bank Authority, in accordance with HUD regulations. 

The City did not properly administer the NSP1 and NSP3 grants of its subrecipient, the Land Bank, in accordance with Federal requirements.  This condition occurred because the City did not maintain proper oversight of its subrecipient.  In addition, the City and the Land Bank did not implement proper procedures to ensure that NSP funds were properly supported.  Therefore, the City provided the Land Bank NSP funds without adequate assurance that the funds would be properly accounted for in accordance with HUD requirements. 

We recommend that the Director of the Atlanta Office of Community Planning and Development require the City to (1) provide adequate monitoring to the Land Bank to ensure that the subrecipient follows Federal regulations, (2) provide adequate support for expenses totaling $48,985, (3) ensure that the Land Bank completes and clears all outstanding annual audits and develops and implements adequate financial and file management policies and procedures, and (4) reprogram the remaining NSP1 funds of $219,851 and NSP3 funds of $28,745 to another subrecipient or developer or reimburse the funds to the U.S. Treasury.

Recommendations

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-AT-1007-001-A
    Closed on April 30, 2019

    Provide adequate monitoring to the Land Bank to ensure that the subrecipient follows Federal regulations as required, including policies and procedures to help verify subrecipient compliance or address any deficiencies in need of correcting, such as annual audits, financial management systems, and file management.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-AT-1007-001-B
    $48,985.00
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on October 14, 2020

    Provide adequate support for expenses totaling $48,985. Any expenses that are not supported should be repaid to the appropriate NSP grant from non-Federal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-AT-1007-001-C
    Closed on March 27, 2019

    Ensure that the Land Bank completes and clears all outstanding annual audits for fiscal years 2012 through 2016.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-AT-1007-001-D
    Closed on June 07, 2019

    Ensure that the Land Bank develops and implements adequate financial and file management policies and procedures to ensure that files are auditable and financial records adequately identify the source and application of federally sponsored activities in accordance with Federal regulations.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-AT-1007-001-E
    $248,596.00
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Closed on June 07, 2019

    Reprogram the remaining NSP1 funds of $219,851 and NSP3 funds of $28,745 to another subrecipient or developer or return the funds to the U.S. Treasury.