U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Document

We audited the City of Hawthorne because of a corrective action verification audit done by the Office of Inspector General (OIG) that identified $840,741 in HOME Investment Partnerships Program funds that were transferred to the Section 8 program between 2005 and 2006 (2013-LA-0802).  The objectives of the audit were to determine (1) the eligibility of $840,741 in 2005 and 2006 HOME program transfers to the Section 8 program, (2) whether the funds were repaid to the HOME program, (3) what activities the City informed the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Office of Community Planning and Development would be performed with the funds, and (4) how HOME funds were used in later years.

The City used nearly $1.6 million of its 2004 and 2005 HOME funds for ineligible activities, which were not repaid to the HOME program.  The City informed HUD’s Office of Community Planning and Development that it would use the funds for various items, including a HOME tenant-based rental program; however, it used its HOME funds to cover shortfalls in Section 8 rental assistance payments.   Although no HOME funds were used for the Section 8 program in later years, the City had not developed written policies and procedures for its HOME program.

We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Los Angeles Office of Community Planning and Development require the City to (1) repay the HOME program account nearly $1.6 million for ineligible HOME funds that were used for Section 8 housing assistance payments and (2) develop and implement written policies and procedures for the HOME program.

Recommendations

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2013-LA-1009-001-A
    $1,595,113.00
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Reimburse its HOME program $1,595,113 from non-Federal funds for HOME funds that were inappropriately used on Section 8 housing assistance payments.