U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Hotline

Report Fraud, Waste and Abuse
July 09, 2015
  • Housing
2015-LA-1005
Return to Index
2015-LA-1005.pdf

We audited NOVA Financial & Investment Corporation based on a referral from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Quality Assurance Division detailing a separate lender that originated Federal Housing Administration (FHA)-insured loans that contained ineligible downpayment assistance gifts.  The HUD Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) analysis identified NOVA as a lender with the highest origination volume in the geographic region that participated in similar downpayment assistance gift programs.  Our objective was to determine whether NOVA originated loans with downpayment assistance in accordance with HUD FHA rules and regulations.

NOVA’s FHA-insured loans with downpayment assistance gift funds did not always comply with HUD FHA rules and regulations, putting the FHA mortgage insurance fund at unnecessary risk, including potential losses of $48.5 million for 709 loans.  NOVA also inappropriately charged borrowers $376,102 in misrepresented discount fees and $7,110 in fees that were not customary or reasonable.  This condition occurred because NOVA did not do its due diligence, relied on development authorities’ program guidelines, and assumed downpayment assistance eligibility based on the reputation of the participating master loan servicer.  The premium rate attached to the ineligible loans put borrowers at a distinct disadvantage due to higher monthly mortgage payments imposed on them.

We recommend that HUD determine legal sufficiency to pursue civil and administrative remedies against NOVA for incorrectly certifying that mortgages were eligible for FHA mortgage insurance.  We also recommend HUD require NOVA to (1) stop originating FHA loans with ineligible gifts; (2) indemnify HUD for 709 FHA loans that were originated with ineligible downpayment assistance gifts, resulting in funds to be put to better use of $48.5 million; (3) reimburse borrowers for $376,102 in misrepresented discount fees and $7110 in fees that were not customary or reasonable; (4) reduce the interest rate for borrowers who received downpayment assistance; (5) reimburse borrowers for overpaid interest as a result of the premium interest rate; and (6) update all internal control checklists to include specific HUD rules and regulations governing downpayment assistance, premium interest rates, and allowable fees.

Recommendations

Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2015-LA-1005-001-E
    $383,212.00
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Reimburse FHA borrowers $376,102 for the unallowable, misrepresented discount fees and $7,110 for fees that were not customary or reasonable.