Lower Manhattan Development Corporation, New York, New York, Administered Disaster Recovery Assistance Funds in Accordance with HUD Regulations
We completed the twelfth report in our ongoing audits of the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation's (the auditee) administration of the Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery Assistance funds provided to the State of New York in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City. During our audit period, April 1 through September 30, 2008, the auditee disbursed approximately $…
May 26, 2009
Report
#2009-NY-1013
The City of Rome, New York, Did Not Administer Its Economic Development Activity in Accordance with HUD Requirements
We completed an audit of the City of Rome, New York's (City), administration of its economic development activity known as General Cable under its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The objectives of our audit were to determine whether the City (1) administered this economic development activity effectively, efficiently, and economically in accordance with applicable U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) rules…
May 19, 2009
Report
#2009-NY-1012
North Hempstead Housing Authority, Great Neck, New York, Had Weaknesses in Its Housing Choice Voucher and Family Self-Sufficiency Programs
We audited the North Hempstead Housing Authority's (Authority) administration of its Housing Choice Voucher and Family Self-Sufficiency to determine whether the Authority administered these programs in compliance with HUD regulations. The Authority properly determined Section 8 tenant eligibility and accurately calculated rental subsidies. However, the Authority improperly selected both units and tenants for project-based voucher assistance,…
May 14, 2009
Report
#2009-NY-1011
The City of Yonkers, New York, Had Weaknesses in the Administration of its Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program
March 04, 2009
Report
#2009-NY-1009
The City of Newburgh, New York, Did Not Always Administer Its Community Development Block Grant Program in Accordance with HUD Requirements
We completed an audit of the City of Newburgh, New York's administration of its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The objectives of our audit were to determine whether the City (1) administered its CDBG program effectively, efficiently, and economically in accordance with applicable rules and regulations, and (2) expended CDBG funds for eligible activities that met a national objective of the program.
The audit disclosed that…
February 22, 2009
Report
#2009-NY-1008
The City of Rome, New York, Did Not Always Administer Its Community Development Block Grant Program in Accordance with HUD Requirements
January 24, 2009
Report
#2009-NY-1006
The City of New York's Department Housing Preservation and Development, New York, New York, Had Administrative Weaknesses in Its HOME Program
We completed an audit of the City of New York's Department of Housing Preservation and Development (the City), New York, New York to evaluate its administration of the HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME). The audit objectives were to determine whether the City (1) properly committed and disbursed HOME funds; (2) adequately monitored its community housing development organizations, projects, and contractors; and (3) correctly reported…
December 21, 2008
Report
#2008-NY-1003
The Lower Manhattan Development Corporation, New York, New York, Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery Assistance Funds
New York External Audit Reports
The online versions of nearly all OIG documents are presented in Adobe's Portable Document Format (PDF). If you don't already have it installed on your system, get a free PDF reader here to view our documents.
Issue Date: May 17, 2012
Audit Memorandum No. 2012-NY-1801
Title: New York City Housing Authority Hotline Complaint, Case Number HL-2011-0705
We completed a review of the New York City Housing Authority’s…
December 02, 2008
Report
#2009-NY-1003
The New York City Housing Authority, New York, New York, Had Administrative Weaknesses in Its Capital Fund Program
We performed an audit of the New York City Housing Authority's (Authority) administration of its capital fund program as part of the Office of Inspector General's (OIG) strategic plan goals to improve the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) fiscal accountability. We selected the Authority based on the size of its capital fund program, more than $2 billion authorized and more than $1.3 billion expended in fiscal years 2001…
November 23, 2008
Report
#2009-NY-1002
The City of Newburgh, New York, Needs to Make Improvements in Administering Its Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program
November 05, 2008
Report
#2009-NY-1001
Deconstruction Activity Costs under the World Trade Center Memorial and Cultural Program are Impacting Other Approved Programs
As part of the tenth of our ongoing audits of the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation's (LMDC) administration of Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery Assistance funds, we reviewed the nature of costs incurred under the activity entitled "World Trade Center Memorial and Cultural" program related to the deconstruction of the Deutsche Bank building in New York City. The review raised concern about funding of the deconstruction…
November 04, 2008
Memorandum
#2009-NY-0801
Bethany Housing, Inc., South Pasadena, Florida, Did Not Conduct Proper Oversight of Project Operations Resulting in Financial Harm to the Project
We audited Bethany Towers Apartments as part of our annual goal for auditing multifamily projects and in response to a request from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Tampa, Florida, Multifamily Division. We focused the audit on the nonprofit owner's and management agents' compliance with the project's regulatory agreement, applicable laws, and other HUD requirements pertaining to the sale and transfer of ownership…
September 17, 2008
Report
#2008-AT-1013
The Miami-Dade Housing Agency, Miami, Florida, Did Not Maintain Adequate Controls over Capital Fund Program Drawdowns
HUD OIG audited the Miami Dade Housing Agency (Agency) capital fund program. The objective of the audit was to determine whether the Agency used capital fund program drawdowns in accordance with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements. The Agency did not use capital fund program drawdowns in accordance with HUD requirements.
The Agency's internal controls over capital fund program drawdowns from HUD were inadequate.…
September 16, 2008
Report
#2008-AT-0004
The City of Jacksonville, Florida, Lacked Adequate Controls over Its HOME Program
We audited the City of Jacksonville/Duval County's (City) HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) as part of our annual audit plan. We selected the City because it had the largest funded program in northern Florida and other risk factors. Our audit objectives were to determine whether the City administered its HOME program in accordance with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) requirements concerning the (1)…
September 04, 2008
Report
#2008-AT-1012
Wells Fargo Bank NA, Rochester, New York, Branch Office, Did Not Always Comply with HUD/FHA Loan Origination Requirements
August 25, 2008
Report
#2008-NY-1010
Tuckahoe Housing Authority, Low-Rent Housing and Nonprofit Entity Activities, Tuckahoe, New York
We audited the Tuckahoe Housing Authority (Authority) to assess the merits of a complaint and determine whether the Authority administered its low-rent housing program and nonprofit entity activities in accordance with the annual contributions contract and other U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations. The audit disclosed that the Authority did not adequately administer its low-rent program and nonprofit entity…
June 18, 2008
Report
#2008-NY-1008
The Miami Dade Housing Agency, Miami, Florida, Did Not Maintain Adequate Controls over Its Capital Fund Program
HUD-OIG audited the Miami Dade Housing Agency (Agency) capital fund program. The objective of the audit was to determine whether the Agency had adequate controls to ensure that contracts were awarded in accordance with regulations and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements.
The Agency did not have adequate controls to ensure that contracts were awarded in accordance with regulations and HUD requirements. It did not…
April 23, 2008
Report
#2008-AT-0002
Lower Manhattan Development Corporation, Community Development Block Grant, Disaster Recovery Assistance Funds, New York, New York
This is the tenth report in our ongoing audits of the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation's (the auditee) administration of the Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery Assistance funds provided to the State of New York. During our audit period, April 1, 2007, through September 30, 2007, the auditee disbursed approximately $132.7 million of the $2.783 billion funds appropriated. The objectives of this audit were to determine…
March 30, 2008
Report
#2008-NY-1004
Corrective Action Verification Miami-Dade Housing Agency Did Not Ensure Section 8-Assisted Units Met Housing Quality Standards, Audit Report 2006-AT-1001
HUD OIG performed a corrective action verification of the audit recommendations cited in the audit report, Miami-Dade Housing Agency (Agency) Did Not Ensure Section 8-Assisted Units Met Housing Quality Standards (2006-AT-1001) issued December 21, 2005. The purpose of the corrective action verification was to determine if the selected audit recommendations were implemented and the deficiencies reported in the audit report corrected.
The Agency…
February 09, 2008
Memorandum
#2008-AT-0801
The City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Did Not Properly Administer ItsCommunity Development Block Grant Program
HUD OIG audited the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program administered by the City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida (City). The objective of the audit was to determine whether the City administered its CDBG program in accordance with applicable U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements. The City did not administer its CDBG program in accordance with applicable HUD requirements.
It did not provide supporting…
January 09, 2008
Report
#2008-AT-1005