The Wilmington Housing Authority, Wilmington, North Carolina, Needs to Improve Internal Controls Over Its Program
March 08, 2007
Report
#2007-AT-1004
The Newport News Redevelopment and Housing Authority, Newport News, Virginia, Did Not Always Follow HUD Requirements
February 19, 2007
Report
#2007-PH-1005
Oakland Housing Authority Did Not Comply with Procurement and Contracting Requirements
February 13, 2007
Report
#2007-LA-1005
The Housing Authority of the City of Evansville, Indiana, Needs to Improve Its Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program Administration
February 12, 2007
Report
#2007-CH-1003
The Housing Authority of East St. Louis, IlliNis, Improperly Used Public Housing Funds
What We Audited and Why
We audited the East St. Louis Housing Authority (Authority) because of a hotline complaint alleging that Authority’s management misused U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funds. Our audit objective was to determine whether the Authority followed HUD’s regulations and its own policies when procuring goods and services, granting leave, and managing vehicle operations.
What We Found …
January 12, 2007
Report
#2007-KC-1004
The Marion Housing Authority, Marion, Indiana, Improperly Used HUD funds for nonprofit Development Activities
What We Audited and Why
We audited the Marion Housing Authority's (Authority) nonprofit development activities. The review of public housing authorities' development activities is set forth in our fiscal year 2006 annual audit plan. We selected the Authority because it was identified as having high-risk indicators of nonprofit development activity. Our objective was to determine whether the Authority diverted or pledged resources subject to its…
December 13, 2006
Report
#2007-CH-1001
Housing Authority of the County of Cook, Chicago, IlliNis, Had Weak Controls over Its Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program
What We Audited and Why
We audited the Housing Authority of the County of Cook's (Authority) Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program (program). The audit was part of the activities in our fiscal year 2005 annual audit plan. We selected the Authority based upon a risk analysis that identified it as having a high-risk program. Our objective was to determine whether the Authority managed its program in accordance with the U.S. Department of…
September 30, 2006
Report
#2006-CH-1021
Rockford Housing Authority, Rockford, IlliNis, Needs to Improve Its Controls over Program Housing Assistance and Utility Allowance Payments
What We Audited and Why
We audited the Rockford Housing Authority's (Authority) Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program (program). The audit was part of the activities in our fiscal year 2005 annual audit plan. We selected the Authority based upon a risk analysis that identified it as having a high-risk program. Our objective was to determine whether the Authority managed its program in accordance with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban…
September 29, 2006
Report
#2006-CH-1020
Saginaw Housing Commission, Saginaw, Michigan Improperly Used Public Housing Funds to Purchased Property
What We Audited and Why
We audited the Saginaw Housing Commission's (Commission) Public Housing Operating Fund program (program). We initiated the audit based on a request from the Detroit Office of Public Housing for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). We audit was also part of the activities in our fiscal year 2006 annual audit plan. Our objective was to determine whether the Commission properly used its program funds…
September 28, 2006
Report
#2006-CH-1018
The Housing Authority of the City of Passaic Section 8 and Public Housing Capital Fund Programs
What We Audited and Why
In response to a hotline complaint that the Housing Authority of the City of Passaic (Authority) was being mismanaged, we audited the Authority's Section 8 and Public Housing Capital Fund programs. We also audited controls over disbursements and costs allocated to different programs. The objective of the audit was to determine whether the allegations of hotline complaint were valid. We also determined if Section 8 units…
September 22, 2006
Report
#2006-NY-1012
Orange City Housing Authority , Orange, New Jersey, Has Weakness in its Housing Choice Voucher Program
What We Audited and Why
We audited the Orange City Housing Authority's (Authority) Housing Choice Voucher program because a regional risk assessment ranked the Authority fifth on our list of potential public housing authority audits in New Jersey.
Our audit objectives were to determine whether (I) the Authority's Housing Choice Voucher program units met housing quality standards; (2) costs charged to the Housing Choice Voucher program were…
September 20, 2006
Report
#2006-NY-1010
HUD Incorrectly Approved $42 Million in Operating Subsidies for Phase-Down for Demolition Add-On Funding
We audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Public and Indian Housing, phase-down for demolition add-on funding (phase-down funding) calculations for the Public Housing Operating Fund program. We initiated the audit based on results of a prior audit that indicated the Office of Public and Indian Housing add to always obtain adequate supporting documentation for public housing agencies before approving…
June 11, 2006
Report
#2006-BO-0001
Benton Harbor Housing Commission Public Housing Capital Fund Program, Benton Harbor, Michigan
We audited the Benton Harbor Housing Commission's (Commission) Public Housing Captial Fund program (program). The audit was conducted based upon a request from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Detroit Office of Public Housing. Our objectives were to determine whether the Commission operated its program in a manner that provides reasonable assurance that (1) expenditures were adequately supported and eligible and (2)…
May 18, 2006
Report
#2006-CH-1010
Kankakee County Housing Authority Low-Rent Housing Program, Kankakee, IL
What We Audited and Why
We audited the Kankakee County Housing Authority's (Authority) Low-Rent Housing program. The audit was conducted in response to a citizen's complaint to our office and was part of our comprehensive audit of the Authority. The objective of our audit was to determine whether the Authority administered its Low-Rent Housing program in an efficient and effective manner. We determined whether the Authority had adequate…
April 08, 2005
Report
#2005_CH-1010
Kankakee County Housing Authority Low-Rent Housing Program, Kankakee, IL
We audited the Kankakee County Housing Authority's (Authority) Low-Rent Housing Program. The audit was conducted in response to a citizen's complaint to our office and was part of our comprehensive audit of the Authority. The object of our audit was to determine whether the Authority administered its Low-Rent Housing program in an efficient and effective manner. We determined whether the Authority had adequate procedures and controls over its…
April 08, 2005
Report
#2005-CH-1010
Royal Oak Township Housing Commission, Public Housing Program, Ferndale, Michigan
What We Audited and Why
We completed an audit of the Royal Oak Township Housing Commission's Public Housing Program. We selected the Housing Commission for audit based on two citizen complaints. The complainants alleged that the Housing Commission's Public Housing units were in poor physical condition, tenants were housed contrary to HUD's requirements, and Public Housing funds wer misspent. The objectives of the audit were to determine whether…
November 29, 2004
Report
#2005-CH-1003
Housing Authority of the City of Durham, Durham, Nrth Carolina
What We Audited and Why
We audited the Durham Housing Authority's (Authority) financial operations and procurement procedures, because a prior Office of the Inspector General (OIG) audit identified potential deficiencies in these areas.
Our audit objectives were to determine if the Authority's misuse of funds, identified in our prior report, jeopardized its ability to operate its projects in a manner that promotes serviceability, economy,…
November 19, 2004
Report
#2005-AT-1004