Final Civil Action – Loan Origination Fraud on Federal Housing Administration Loans (Report Not Available to the Public)
We reviewed alleged violations of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loan origination requirements by the subject. We concluded that the subject created and altered documents used in mortgage loan applications for Government-insured home loans. The Department of Justice filed a complaint under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act; and in December 2011 reached…
March 30, 2012
Memorandum
#2012-CF-1801
Final Civil Action – Loan Origination Fraud on Federal Housing Administration Loans (Report Not Available to the Public)
We reviewed alleged violations of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loan origination requirements by the subject. We concluded that the subject placed fraudulent information and documents in mortgage loan applications for Government-insured home loans. The Department of Justice filed a complaint under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act; and in December 2011…
March 30, 2012
Memorandum
#2012-CF-1802
Four Freedoms House of Philadelphia, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, Generally Managed Its Section 202 Housing Project in Accordance With Applicable Requirements
We audited Four Freedoms House of Philadelphia, Inc.’s management of its Section 202 housing project. We selected Four Freedoms for an audit because we received a complaint alleging that it mismanaged its Section 202 housing project. Our audit objective was to determine whether Four Freedoms managed its Section 202 housing project according to the requirements of its regulatory agreement and applicable HUD requirements. We focused the audit…
March 14, 2012
Report
#2012-PH-1007
The City of Los Angeles, CA, Did Not Expend Brownfields Economic Development Initiative and Section 108 Funds for the Goodyear Industrial Tract Project in Accordance With HUD Requirements
The City did not expend Brownfields and Section 108 funds awarded for the development of the project in accordance with HUD requirements. Specifically, the City used loan and grant funds for an ineligible project and expended grant funds after the grant deadline. As a result, it expended (1) $3.8 million in loan funds on an ineligible project, (2) $625,000 in grant funds on an ineligible project after the grant expenditure deadline, and (3) an…
March 13, 2012
Report
#2012-LA-1005
Ally Financial, Incorporated Foreclosure and Claims Process Review Fort Washington, PA
As part of the Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) nationwide effort to review the foreclosure practices of the five largest Federal Housing Administration (FHA) mortgage servicers (Bank of America, Wells Fargo Bank, CitiMortgage, JP Morgan Chase, and Ally Financial, Incorporated) we reviewed Ally Financial, Incorporated’s foreclosure and claims processes. In addition to this memorandum, OIG issued separate memorandums for each of the other…
March 12, 2012
Memorandum
#2012-PH-1801
Luzerne County, PA, Generally Administered Its Community Development Block Grant Recovery Act Funds According to Applicable Requirements
We audited Luzerne County, PA's administration of its Community Development Block Grant funds that it received under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. We selected the County for an audit because we received a complaint alleging that the County may have misappropriated Block Grant funds and because of our mandate to audit Recovery Act activities. Our audit objective was to determine whether the County obligated, expended…
January 12, 2012
Report
#2012-PH-1004
The City of Modesto, CA Did Not Always Comply with Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2 (NSP2) Requirements
We audited the City of Modesto’s Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2 (NSP2). We performed the review because it was part of the Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) audit plan to conduct audits of NSP2 under the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009. We selected the City because it received $25 million and HUD’s San Francisco Office of Community Planning and Development requested that OIG consider a review of the City.
Program funds…
December 21, 2011
Report
#2012-LA-1003
Countrywide Bank, FSB, Calabasas, CA, Did Not Comply With HUD Requirements for Underwriting FHA Loans and Fully Implement Its Quality Control Program In Accordance With HUD's Requirements
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Inspector General audited Countrywide Bank, FSB (Countrywide),* a Federal Housing Administration (FHA) supervised lender** approved to originate, underwrite, and submit mortgages for insurance under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) direct endorsement program. We selected Countrywide based on its average default-to-claim rate of 6.76 percent for the FHA-…
September 30, 2011
Report
#2011-CH-1016
Final Civil Action – Alleged Loan Origination Fraud on Federal Housing Administration Loan (Report Not Available to the Public)
We conducted a review to determine whether IndyMac Bank followed Federal Housing Administration (FHA) policies and procedures when it originated FHA-insured loans. We focused on loans secured by California properties and that were in claim or default status as of February 12, 2009. Within this group, we identified a set of questionable loans originated by IndyMac that had been generated by Beechwood Incorporated. Beechwood is a company…
September 29, 2011
Memorandum
#2011-CF-1803
The Philadelphia Housing Authority, Philadelphia, PA, Did Not Have Conflicts of Interest Related to Recovery Act Rehabilitation but Failed To Comply With Financial Disclosure Requirements
We audited the Philadelphia Housing Authority’s compliance with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) conflict-of-interest and financial disclosure requirements as a result of the Authority’s initial failure to comply with an Office of Inspector General (OIG) subpoena during a previous American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 audit. (HUD OIG audit report number 2011-PH-1010, “The Philadelphia Housing Authority,…
September 28, 2011
Report
#2011-PH-1016
Final Civil Action - Loan Origination Fraud on Federal Housing Administration Loans (Report Not Available to the Public)
We reviewed alleged violations of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loan origination requirements by the subject. We concluded that the subject falsely certified to the truthfulness and accuracy of documents and information in mortgage loan applications on FHA-insured loans. The Department of Justice filed a complaint under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement…
September 27, 2011
Memorandum
#2011-CF-1804
Final Civil Action - Loan Origination Fraud on Federal Housing Administration Loans (Report Not Available to the Public)
We reviewed alleged violations of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loan origination requirements by the subject. We concluded that the subject made false statements on a mortgage loan application for one property, and falsely acted as the seller of a second property on behalf of another person. The Department of Justice filed a complaint under the Financial Institutions Reform,…
September 27, 2011
Memorandum
#2011-CF-1805
The Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino, CA, Did Not Adequately Complete All Procurements for Its Recovery Act Capital Fund Grants in Accordance With HUD Requirements
We audited the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Public Housing Capital Fund formula and competitive grants. We performed the audit because Recovery Act reviews are part of the Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) annual plan and the Los Angeles Office Public Housing’s 2011 risk assessment rated the Authority as high risk based on data from the Authority’s most recent Real Estate…
September 26, 2011
Report
#2011-LA-1019
The Tule River Indian Housing Authority, Porterville, CA Did Not Administer the Procurement and Contracting of Its Recovery Act Native American Housing Block Grant in Accordance With HUD requirements
We audited the Tule River Indian Housing Authority in response to a complaint involving the Authority’s alleged misuse and improper procurement of $303,721 in Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Native American Housing Block Grant funding to be used for cabinet construction work on 38 of its housing units. Our overall objective was to determine whether the Authority followed procurement and contracting requirements and used its Recovery Act…
September 22, 2011
Report
#2011-LA-1018
The City of Compton Did Not Administer Its HOME Program in Compliance With HOME Requirements
We audited the City of Compton’s (City) HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) in response to a citizen complaint generally alleging misuse of HOME funds by the Community Redevelopment Agency (subrecipient) administering the program, including allegations stating that more than $4 million in HOME funds was missing and that program objectives were not met. Our audit objective was to determine the validity of the complaint allegations,…
August 18, 2011
Report
#2011-LA-1016
The Allegheny County Housing Authority, Pittsburgh, PA, Did Not Always Procure Goods and Services or Obligate Funds According to Recovery Act and Applicable HUD Requirements
We audited the Allegheny County Housing Authority’s administration of its Public Housing Capital Fund grants that it received under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. We selected the Authority for audit because it received a $7.7 million formula grant and three competitive grants totaling $5.8 million, which was the third largest formula grant and the second largest amount of capital fund competitive grants awarded in…
August 10, 2011
Report
#2011-PH-1014
The Housing Authority of the County of Monterey, Salinas, CA, Did Not Administer the Procurement and Contracting of Its Capital Fund Recovery Grant Funds in Accordance With HUD Laws and Regulations
We completed an audit of the Housing Authority of the County of Monterey’s (Authority) administration of more than $2.9 million in Capital Fund Recovery Grant funding as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Our objective was to determine whether the Authority administered the procurement and contracting of its grant funds in accordance with HUD laws and regulations. The Authority did not administer the procurement and…
July 21, 2011
Report
#2011-LA-1014
The Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles, Monterey Park, CA, Generally Administered the Procurement and Contracting of Its Recovery Act Capital Fund Formula Grant in Accordance With HUD Requirements
We audited the Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles’ American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Capital Fund formula grant. We performed the audit because Recovery Act reviews are part of the Office of the Inspector General’s (OIG) annual plan and because the Authority was the fourth highest overall recipient of Recovery Act capital funds in California. Our audit objective was to determine whether the Authority administered the…
July 14, 2011
Report
#2011-LA-1013
Prospect Mortgage, LLC, Sherman Oaks, CA, Did Not Always Comply With Federal Housing Administration Underwriting and Quality Control Requirements
We audited Federal Housing Administration (FHA)-insured loans underwritten by Prospect Mortgage, LLC (Prospect), within Region IV of the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Office of Inspector General (OIG). Our objective was to determine whether Prospect complied with HUD’s requirements for (1) origination and underwriting relative to cash assets, income, and creditworthiness; (2) quality controls; and (3) branch office…
July 08, 2011
Report
#2011-AT-1011
The City of Reading, PA, Generally Complied With Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2 Requirements
We audited the City of Reading, PA’s Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2 as part of our annual audit plan to review activities funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) because the City received $5 million in Program funds under the Recovery Act. Our audit objective was to determine whether the City (1) met Program expenditure deadlines, (2) made Program expenditures that were eligible and adequately supported…
June 30, 2011
Report
#2011-PH-1012