Evaluation of the Final Front-End Risk Assessment for the Tax Credit Assistance Program
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Office of Inspector General reviewed HUD's assessment of the risk for the Tax Credit Assistance Program. Our objective was to determine whether HUD’s front-end risk assessment (assessment) of the Program complied with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance for implementing the Recovery Act and applicable HUD requirements. Our review of the final assessment for the Program…
September 22, 2009
Memorandum
#2009-PH-0802
Evaluation of the Final Front-End Risk Assessment of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009's Green Retrofit Program for Multifamily Housing
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Office of Inspector General reviewed the front-end risk assessment (assessment) of the Green Retrofit Program (program) for Multifamily Housing for HUD. Our objective was to determine whether the assessment complied with the Office of Management and Budget’s guidance for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act); the Recovery Act’s Updated Implementing Guidance…
September 13, 2009
Memorandum
#2009-CH-0801
HUD's Administration of the Asset Control Area Program Needs Improvement
We completed an audit of the U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Asset Control Area (ACA) program as a follow-up to a previous OIG audit of this program, and as a part of the Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) strategic plan goals to improve HUD’s fiscal accountability. The objective of the audit was to determine whether HUD administered the ACA program in compliance with ACA program requirements and federal regulations.…
August 31, 2009
Report
#2009-NY-0002
HUD's Monitoring of the Performance-Based Contract Administrators Was Inadequate
We initiated a review of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) monitoring of the performance-based contract administration contract administrators (PBCA) because of our prior audits that reported that HUD paid contract administrators $27.2 million during fiscal year 2006 for work HUD had eliminated and that the Los Angeles multifamily hub did not properly monitor its contractor. Our audit objective was to determine…
August 31, 2009
Report
#2009-SE-0003
Inspection of Whether Duplicate Rental Assistance Payments Were Made to CPD Grant Recipients
We completed an inspection to determine whether recipients of rental assistance payments under HUD’s Community Planning and Development (CPD) Programs also received rental subsidies under HUD’s Section 8 Housing Programs. CPD funding for rental assistance to eligible individuals is provided through five separate grant programs—Shelter Plus Care, Supportive Housing Program, Housing Opportunities for Persons with Aids, Section 8 Moderate…
August 31, 2009
Report
#IED-09-004
Inspection of HUD’s Recapture of Unspent Pre-2005 Disaster Recovery Grant Funds
We performed an inspection to determine whether HUD had appropriately recaptured unspent funds awarded from the more than $5.3 billion in Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery funding appropriated before 2005. According to HUD data, as of August 2008, grant awards totaling $4.7 billion had no unspent funds; 121 grant awards had unspent funds, of which HUD recaptured or deobligated more than $17.5 million.
Our inspection…
August 31, 2009
Report
#IED-08-005
The Office of Affordable Housing Programs’ Oversight of HOME Investment Partnerships Program Income Was Inadequate
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Office of Inspector General audited HUD's Office of Affordable Housing Programs’ (Office) oversight of HOME Investment Partnerships Program (Program) income (including recaptured Program funds). The audit was part of the activities in our fiscal year 2009 annual audit plan to contribute to improving HUD’s execution and accountability of its fiscal responsibilities and our strategic…
August 27, 2009
Report
#2009-CH-0002
The City of Boston's Department of Neighborhood Development in Boston, Massachusetts, Did Not Administer Its HOME Program in Compliance with HUD Requirements
We performed an audit of the City of Boston’s (City) Department of Neighborhood Development (Department). We selected the City based upon the results of our previous audit of the City’s HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) and the significance of the Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) funds awarded. Our objective was to determine whether the City had the capacity to effectively and efficiently administer its NSP under the…
August 18, 2009
Report
#2009-BO-1011
Evaluation of the Final Front-End Risk Analysis for the Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program
For the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) front-end risk assessment (FERA) for the new Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing program (HPRP), we wanted to determine whether the FERA complied with the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) guidance for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act); the Recovery Act’s streamlined FERA process; and HUD Handbook 1840.1, REV-3, Departmental…
August 16, 2009
Memorandum
#2009-BO-0801
HUD Subsidized an Estimated 2,094 to 3,046 Households That Included Lifetime Registered Sex Offenders
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Inspector General audited HUD's requirement prohibiting lifetime registered sex offenders from admission to HUD-subsidized housing. Our audit objective was to determine the extent to which HUD-subsidized housing was occupied by lifetime registered sex offenders.
HUD subsidized an estimated 2,094 to 3,046 households that included lifetime registered sex offenders. As a…
August 13, 2009
Report
#2009-KC-0001
HUD Lacks Adequate Oversight to Require Public Housing Agencies to Separately Account for Unrestricted and Restricted Section 8 Program Administrative Fees
We performed a review of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) oversight of public housing agencies’ unrestricted and restricted Section 8 administrative fee reserves. We initiated this review because in our audits of two housing authorities, neither agency was able to clearly account for its administrative fee reserve funds and demonstrate that they were used appropriately. Our objective was to determine whether HUD…
August 06, 2009
Memorandum
#2009-LA-0802