The Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System that Maintained Recovery Act Information Had Application Security Control Deficiencies
We audited the Disaster Recovery Grants Reporting (DRGR) system to determine whether adequate controls were in place to safeguard and accurately track and report $1.93 billion in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recover Act) funds allocated to the Office of Community Planning and Development’s (CPD) Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2. We found that the improvements that CPD made to the DRGR system within the last year were…
July 28, 2011
Report
#2011-DP-0008
Review of the National Environmental Policy Act and Core Activity Modules Within the Recovery Act Management and Performance System
We audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) management procedures, practices, and controls related to the Recovery Act Management and Reporting System (RAMPS). Our objective was to assess its capability to record and provide data required by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 on which HUD is required to report.
Overall, RAMPS had the capability to record Recovery Act data and produce the reports…
July 22, 2011
Report
#2011-DP-0007
The Housing Authority of the City of Camden, NJ, Did Not Ensure That Its Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program Units Met Housing Quality Standards
We audited the Housing Authority of the City of Camden NJ's administration of its housing quality standards inspection program for its Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program as part of our fiscal year 2010 audit plan. The audit objective addressed in this report was to determine whether the Authority ensured that its program units met the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) housing quality standards. The…
July 19, 2011
Report
#2011-PH-1013
US Dept of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Public Housing, San Francisco, CA, Monitored Recovery Act Grants Awarded to Region IX Public Housing Authority Grantees in Accordance with Applicable Requirements
We audited the monitoring practices that the San Francisco Office of Public Housing (SF OPH) used to monitor American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 supplemental capital formula and competitive grants awarded to public housing agencies in Region IX. The audit was conducted in accordance with a mandate to review the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) monitoring of Recovery Act funds to determine whether there were…
July 15, 2011
Report
#2011-LA-0003
HUD Needs To Obtain Complete Documentation To Close Ginnie Mae Contracts
We audited the Office of the Chief Procurement Officer’s (procurement office) procedures for closing out completed and expired Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae) contracts in compliance with applicable regulations. This audit was part of our audit plan for fiscal year 2010. Our objective was to determine whether the procurement office performed timely closeouts on completed and expired Ginnie Mae contracts.
The procurement…
July 15, 2011
Report
#2011-HA-0003
FHA Has Improved Its Annual Lender Renewal Process, but Challenges Remain
The U. S. Department of Housing and Urban - Office of Inspector General audited the Federal Housing Administration’s (FHA) Title II single-family lender renewal process. Our objective was to determine whether FHA’s Lender Approval and Recertification Division’s (Division) controls were adequate for determining whether lenders met FHA annual renewal requirements.
The Division had taken significant steps to strengthen its controls over the…
July 14, 2011
Report
#2011-KC-0001
HUD Could Improve Its Financial Reporting Process for Obtaining Information on Public Housing Authorities’ Pension and Other Postemployment Benefit Obligations
We conducted an audit of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) controls over public housing authorities’ (PHA) reporting and accounting for pension and other postemployment benefit obligations. Our concern was whether HUD needed to take action to reduce benefits or provide additional funding to ensure the continued viability of PHAs. Our objectives were to determine whether HUD verified that PHAs (1) submitted…
June 27, 2011
Report
#2011-NY-0002
Evaluation of HUD’s Governmentwide Purchase Card Program
HUD OIG conducted an evaluation of HUD’s Governmentwide Purchase Card (GPC) Program. Our objective was to determine whether purchase card transactions complied with prescribed policies and procedures.
We selected a total of 73 transactions for review. Our review indicated that the cardholders did not always ensure that: (1) the availability of funds was properly documented, (2) required sources were used, (3) competitive bids were…
June 17, 2011
Report
#IED-11-003R
HUD’s Controls over Energy Audits and Using Recovery Act Funds for Energy Equipment Did Not Warrant Further Audit Testing
We reviewed the U.S. Department of Housing and Development’s (HUD) process for ensuring that grantee public housing agencies (PHA) receiving American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) Capital Funds complied with Section 152 of the 2005 Energy Act. We reviewed this process because during a recent Recovery Act audit we identified some non-Energy Star compliance and premature replacement purchases and during 2008 grantees paid $…
June 14, 2011
Memorandum
#2011-BO-0801
HUD's Oversight of Its Multifamily Housing Subsidy Payment Review Process Needs Improvement
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Office of Inspector General audited HUD's multifamily housing subsidy payment review process based upon a HUD employee’s complaint. The complaint alleged that HUD lacked controls over its multifamily housing subsidy payment review process and voucher specialists were understaffed and underpaid. Our audit objective was to determine whether HUD had adequate controls over its…
June 06, 2011
Report
#2011-CH-0002
HUD Improved Its Administration of Interagency Agreements
We audited the Office of the Chief Procurement Officer’s (procurement office) administration of interagency agreements (IAAs). This audit was part of our fiscal year 2010 audit plan because of congressional hearings on the use and management of IAAs throughout the Federal Government. Our objective was to determine whether the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) effectively administered its IAAs and the costs to procure these…
May 25, 2011
Report
#2011-HA-0002
HUD Can Improve Its Oversight of ARRA Obligation and Expenditure Requirements
We audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) compliance with obligation deadlines and progress toward meeting expenditure requirements related to eight programs funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). The objectives of our review were to determine whether HUD obligated ARRA funds in accordance with applicable deadlines and to assess HUD’s oversight of grantees’ expenditure of ARRA funds…
May 20, 2011
Report
#2011-FO-0005
The Office of Healthcare Programs Could Increase Its Controls To More Effectively Monitor the Section 232 Program
We audited the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Section 232 program as part of the Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) goal of contributing to the improvement of HUD’s execution and accountability of fiscal responsibilities. Our objective was to determine whether HUD had implemented adequate controls to properly monitor Section 232-insured mortgages.
We found that HUD’s Office of Healthcare Programs had taken steps to…
April 26, 2011
Report
#2011-FW-0002
HUD Did Not Always Follow its Requirements for the Preclosing and Postclosing Review of Mortgage Files Submitted by New Direct Endorsement Lenders
We audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) preclosing and postclosing loan review of new Federal Housing Administration (FHA) direct endorsement lenders to determine whether HUD followed its guidance when (1) reviewing the initial loans underwritten by new FHA direct endorsement lenders and (2) performing the postendorsement technical review of all of the initial loans endorsed by newly approved direct endorsement…
April 18, 2011
Report
#2011-LA-0002
The National Servicing Center Implemented the FHA-HAMP Loss Mitigation Option in Accordance With Rules and Regulations
We audited the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD’s) National Servicing Center’s (NSC) Federal Housing Administration (FHA)-Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) as a part of our annual audit plan. Our objective was to determine whether the NSC implemented and operated FHA-HAMP in accordance with rules and regulations.
Overall, the NSC implemented and operated FHA-HAMP in accordance with the necessary rules and…
April 08, 2011
Report
#2011-FW-0001
The East Orange Revitalization and Development Corporation Did Not Always Comply With HOME Program Requirements and Federal Regulations
We audited the East Orange Revitalization and Development Corporation (Corporation). We selected the Corporation based on a request for an audit from the Newark U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Office of Community Planning and Development. The objective of the review was to determine whether the Corporation complied with HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) requirements and Federal regulations.
Corporation…
April 07, 2011
Report
#2011-NY-1009
The City of East Orange Did Not Always Comply With HOME Program Requirements, Federal Regulations, and HOME Grant Agreements
As part of our audit of the East Orange Revitalization and Development Corporation (Corporation), we reviewed the City of East Orange’s (City) compliance with the HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) in regard to the eligibility of an awarded capacity building grant and developer fees awarded to the Corporation. This review raised issues in regard to the City’s compliance with HOME program requirements, Federal regulations, and HOME…
April 07, 2011
Memorandum
#2011-NY-1801
HUD’s Controls Over Selected Configuration Management Activities Need Improvement
We audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) controls over selected configuration management (CM) activities. This audit was based on work performed during our fiscal year 2009 and 2010 reviews of information system security controls in support of the annual financial statement audits. During those audits, we identified weaknesses in security controls over selected CM activities. HUD had processes and procedures for…
March 24, 2011
Report
#2011-DP-0006
The Jersey City Housing Authority, Jersey City, NJ, Did Not Always Obligate or Disburse Replacement Housing Factor Capital Fund Grants in a Timely Manner
We audited the Jersey City Housing Authority’s (Authority) administration of its Replacement Housing Factor (RHF) grants received under the capital fund program. This is the third audit report regarding the Authority’s capital fund programs. We selected the Authority because of the size of its capital fund programs and because of its U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) risk rating. Our audit objective was to determine…
March 18, 2011
Report
#2011-NY-1008
The Jersey City Housing Authority, Jersey City, NJ, Had Financial Control Weaknesses in Its Recovery Act Funded Public Housing Capital Fund Program
We audited the Jersey City Housing Authority’s (Authority) administration of its public housing capital fund program funded under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act). This is the second audit report regarding the Authority’s capital fund programs. We selected the Authority because of the size of its capital fund programs and because of its U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) risk rating. Our…
March 10, 2011
Report
#2011-NY-1007