Search Term Techniques
When searching with multiple terms consider wrapping the words in quotes "terms here" to search on the whole set of terms over individual words.
The Topeka, KS, Housing Authority Did Not Always Document Its Procurement Actions and Did Not Accurately Report on Its Recovery Act Funds
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Inspector General audited the Topeka, KS Housing Authority’s administration of its Recovery Act competitive capital fund grants. We selected the Authority for review because it spent a large amount of Recovery Act funds. Our Read More
April 04, 2012
Report
#2012-KC-1003
Wells Fargo Bank, Foreclosure and Claims Process Review, Fort Mill, SC
As part of the Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) nationwide effort to review the foreclosure practices of the five largest Federal Housing Administration (FHA) mortgage servicers (Bank of America, Wells Fargo Bank, CitiMortgage, JP Morgan Chase, and Ally Financial, Incorporated) we reviewed Read More
March 11, 2012
Memorandum
#2012-AT-1801
Allied Home Mortgage Capital Corporation, Houston, Texas, Did Not Fully Follow HUD's Branch Office Requirements
We reviewed Allied Home Mortgage Capital Corporation (Allied), a nonsupervised loan correspondent. The objective of the review was to determine the validity of a hotline complaint that Allied operated its branches in violation of U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements Read More
February 08, 2009
Report
#2009-FW-1005
Ally Financial, Incorporated Foreclosure and Claims Process Review Fort Washington, PA
As part of the Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) nationwide effort to review the foreclosure practices of the five largest Federal Housing Administration (FHA) mortgage servicers (Bank of America, Wells Fargo Bank, CitiMortgage, JP Morgan Chase, and Ally Financial, Incorporated) we reviewed Ally Read More
March 11, 2012
Memorandum
#2012-PH-1801
The City of Binghamton, NY, Did Not Always Administer Its Section 108 Loan Program in Accordance With HUD Requirements
We completed an audit of the operations of the City of Binghamton, NY (City), pertaining to its administration of its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Section 108 Loan Guarantee program. Our audit objectives were to determine whether the City (1) administered its Section 108 loan program Read More
December 20, 2010
Report
#2011-NY-1004
The City of Newburgh, New York, Did Not Always Administer Its Community Development Block Grant Program in Accordance with HUD Requirements
We completed an audit of the City of Newburgh, New York's administration of its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The objectives of our audit were to determine whether the City (1) administered its CDBG program effectively, efficiently, and economically in accordance with Read More
February 22, 2009
Report
#2009-NY-1008
The City of Philadelphia, PA, Generally Administered Its Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2 Grant in Accordance With Applicable Requirements
We audited the City of Philadelphia, PA’s administration of its Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2 grant that it received under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 as part of our fiscal year 2012 audit plan. Our objective was to determine whether the grantee administered the Read More
June 20, 2012
Report
#2012-PH-1009
The City of Rochester, New York's Management Controls Over the Asset Control Area Program Needs Improvement To Comply With All Requirements
We completed an audit of the City of Rochester's (City) asset control area (ACA) program as part of a nationwide audit of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) monitoring of ACA participants. The objective of the audit was to determine whether the City administered Read More
February 11, 2009
Report
#2009-NY-1007
The City of Rome, New York, Did Not Always Administer Its Community Development Block Grant Program in Accordance with HUD Requirements
We completed an audit of the City of Rome, New York's (City) administration of its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The objectives of our audit were to determine whether the City (1) administered its CDBG program effectively, efficiently, and economically in accordance with Read More
January 25, 2009
Report
#2009-NY-1006
The City of Scranton, PA, Did Not Administer Its Community Development Block Grant Program in Accordance With HUD Requirements
We audited the City of Scranton, PA’s (City) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. We selected the City for audit because of the size of its program, its high U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) risk analysis score, and a citizen’s complaint alleging misuse of HUD Read More
November 06, 2010
Report
#2011-PH-1002
The City of Seattle, WA, Used Its Recovery Act CDBG-R Funds in Accordance With HUD and Recovery Act Requirements
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Inspector General audited the City of Seattle’s Community Development Block Grant-
Recovery (CDBG-R) program to determine whether the City used its CDBG-R funds in accordance with HUD and Recovery Act requirements and Read More
June 24, 2012
Report
#2012-SE-1004
The City of Syracuse, NY, Did Not Always Administer Its Economic Development Initiative Program in Accordance With HUD Requirements
We audited the City of Syracuse, NY, pertaining to its Economic Development Initiative (EDI)-Special Project grants. The audit objective was to determine whether City officials were administering EDI Special Project grants effectively, efficiently, and economically in accordance with applicable Read More
February 19, 2012
Report
#2012-NY-1007
The City of Troy, New York, Did Not Always Administer Its Community Development Block Grant Program in Accordance with HUD Requirements
We completed an audit of the operations of the City of Troy, New York (the City), pertaining to its administration of its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The objective of our audit was to determine whether the City administered its CDBG program in an effective and efficient manner Read More
May 21, 2008
Report
#2008-NY-1006
The City of Yonkers, New York, Had Weaknesses in the Administration of its Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program
We audited the City of Yonkers, New York's (the City) administration of its Section 108 Loan Guarantee program to determine whether the City disbursed Section 108 loan guarantee program funds for eligible costs and adequately safeguarded funds and prevented misuse. The audit disclosed that the Read More
March 05, 2009
Report
#2009-NY-1009
Corrective Action Verification -HUD's Housing Counseling Assistance Program
We completed a corrective action verification regarding the recommendations made to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Office of Single Family Program Development pertaining to our review of HUD’s monitoring of the Housing Counseling Assistance Program, Audit Report 2006- Read More
May 07, 2012
Memorandum
#2012-NY-0801
Corrective Action Verification, City of Tulsa – Community Development Block Grant Land Use and Program Income Audit Report 2008-FW-1012
The Director of the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Oklahoma City Office of Community Planning and Development requested that we perform a corrective action verification of recommendation 1B in audit report 2008-FW-1012, The City of Tulsa, OK, Allowed Its Largest Read More
April 09, 2012
Memorandum
#2012-FW-1803
The District of Columbia, Washington DC, Did Not Administer Its HOME Program in Accordance With Federal Requirements
We audited the District of Columbia’s (grantee) administration of its HOME Investment Partnerships program (HOME) at the request of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Office of Affordable Housing. This is our second and final of two reports issued in relation to the Read More
December 21, 2010
Report
#2011-PH-1005
Four Freedoms House of Philadelphia, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, Generally Managed Its Section 202 Housing Project in Accordance With Applicable Requirements
We audited Four Freedoms House of Philadelphia, Inc.’s management of its Section 202 housing project. We selected Four Freedoms for an audit because we received a complaint alleging that it mismanaged its Section 202 housing project. Our audit objective was to determine whether Four Freedoms Read More
March 13, 2012
Report
#2012-PH-1007
Gloucester Township, NJ, Did Not Always Administer Its Community Development Block Grant Recovery Act Funds According to Applicable Requirements
We audited Gloucester Township, NJ's administration of its Community Development Block Grant funds that it received under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. We selected the Township for an audit because we received two complaints alleging that it misused stimulus funds and Read More
March 13, 2012
Report
#2012-PH-1006
Gold Financial Services, Inc., San Antonio, TX, Did Not Follow HUD/FHA Requirements in Underwriting Two Loans and Originated a Third in Violation of Its Own Internal Controls
The U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Office of Inspector General (OIG) performed an audit of Gold Financial Services, Inc. (Gold Financial), a Federal Housing Administration (FHA) direct endorsement lender and a branch of AmericaHomeKey, Inc., in San Antonio, TX. We selected Read More
October 24, 2010
Report
#2011-FW-1002