U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Document

We audited the City of Hattiesburg’s HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) program based on a referral from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Community Planning and Development’s field office in Jackson, MS, to address a request by the City’s mayor for a comprehensive review of the City’s HOME program.  In addition, we selected the City for review in accordance with our annual audit plan.  The objective of our review was to determine whether the City administered its HOME program in accordance with HUD’s and its own requirements.

The City did not always administer its HOME program in accordance with HUD’s and its own requirements.  Specifically, the City did not always (1) adequately support commitments or commit funds within the required timeframe, (2) ensure that its written agreements met HUD’s requirements, (3) enter commitments into HUD’s Integrated Disbursement and Information System (IDIS) in a timely manner, (4) disburse funds appropriately, and (5) ensure that activities met its own affordability period requirements.  This condition occurred because the City’s staff was not fully aware of HUD’s and its own requirements and the City lacked adequate procedures to ensure compliance with HUD’s requirements for timeliness of commitments.  As a result, the City (1) inappropriately used more than $441,000 in program funds without adequate documentation to support commitments and disbursements, (2) failed to commit more than $32,000 in program funds within the statutory commitment deadline, and (3) inappropriately disbursed more than $33,000 before executing written agreements.  In addition, HUD and the City lacked assurance that the HOME program was administered in accordance with HUD’s and the City’s requirements.  Lastly, the City compromised the integrity and the degree of reliability that HUD could place on the data in IDIS.

We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Jackson, MS, Office of Community Planning and Development require the City to (1) support more than $474,000 or reimburse its program from non-Federal funds and (2) develop and implement procedures to ensure that the HOME program is administered in accordance with HUD’s and its own requirements.  Further, we recommend that the Director recapture more than $32,000 in program funds not committed by the City.

Recommendations

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-AT-1011-001-A
    $565,511.00
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on October 16, 2020

    Require the City to support $441,202 ($370,729 $20,000 $50,473) or reimburse its program from non-Federal funds for commitments and expenditures not adequately supported.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-AT-1011-001-B
    $33,258.00
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on September 30, 2020

    Require the City to reimburse its program $33,258 from non-Federal funds for inappropriate costs incurred before the written agreements were executed.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-AT-1011-001-C
    $32,019.00
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Closed on April 22, 2019

    Recapture and thereby put $32,019 to better use, which the City did not commit by its 24-month statutory commitment deadline in fiscal year 2015 funding for activity 1464.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-AT-1011-001-D
    Closed on August 10, 2020

    Require the City to develop and implement HOME procedures, including training for the City’s employees, to ensure that (1) commitments are accurately entered into IDIS to maintain data integrity and (2) the HOME program is administered in accordance with HUD’s and its own requirements.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-AT-1011-001-E
    Closed on October 14, 2020

    Verify that the remaining 14 (Footnote 5 - As detailed in the Scope and Methodology section of this report, we reviewed 23 of the 37 commitments entered into IDIS by the City.) commitments made during the period January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2017, were properly supported with written agreements and accurately entered into IDIS.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-AT-1011-001-F
    Closed on August 10, 2020

    Require the City to follow its newly developed policy regarding the execution of a written agreement that is signed and dated by all parties before the commitment of any funds in IDIS.