U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Document

We audited the Public Housing Capital Fund program at the Housing Authority of the City of Woonsocket, RI, based on a request by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and because we have not audited the Authority in more than 10 years.  We also received a complaint regarding a property purchase and later demolition next to one of the Authority’s developments.  The audit objective was to determine whether the Authority administered its Capital Fund program in accordance with HUD’s requirements; specifically, whether costs were eligible and supported and the Authority procured and awarded contracts in accordance with HUD requirements and its procurement policies.  In addition, we wanted to determine whether the complaint regarding the Authority’s purchase of a property and later demolition of the property next to one of its developments had merit.

Authority officials did not administer the Capital Fund program in accordance with HUD requirements.  Specifically, they did not always ensure that Capital Fund activity costs were eligible and supported.  They did not always follow environmental review requirements and support that awarded contracts were procured in accordance with HUD requirements.  Although the complaint reviewed had merit, non-Federal funds were used for the property purchase and demolition.  These deficiencies occurred because Authority officials did not have adequate policies and procedures or always follow them to ensure that they met environmental review, procurement, and contract administration requirements.  As a result, the Authority spent more than $1.9 million for ineligible costs and more than $1.4 million for unsupported costs and may spend $125,491 for ineligible costs.

We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Boston Office of Public and Indian Housing require Authority officials to (1) repay from non-Federal sources more than $1.9 million in ineligible costs related to environmental deficiencies and for payments made beyond the contract terms, (2) support that more than $1.4 million spent was fair and reasonable and in accordance with Federal procurement and environmental review requirements or repay from non-Federal funds any amounts that cannot be supported, and (3) deobligate $125,491 in funds not yet spent on ineligible activities and costs.

Recommendations

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1002-001-A
    $1,864,914.00
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on February 23, 2021

    Repay from non-Federal sources the $1,864,914 in ineligible costs related to environmental deficiencies

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1002-001-B
    $85,204.00
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on April 08, 2021

    Repay from non-Federal sources the $85,204 in ineligible costs related to payments made beyond the contract terms.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1002-001-C
    $101,052.00
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on April 08, 2021

    Support that the $101,052 spent for one activity followed Federal environmental review requirements or repay this amount from non-Federal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1002-001-D
    $1,325,967.00
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on April 08, 2021

    Support that the $1,325,967 spent for activities was fair and reasonable in accordance with Federal procurement requirements or repay from non-Federal funds any amounts that cannot be supported

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1002-001-E
    $113,710.00
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Closed on August 21, 2020

    Deobligate $113,710 in funds not yet spent on ineligible activities with environmental review deficiencies and work with HUD to determine whether these funds can be reobligated to eligible activities.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1002-001-F
    $11,781.00
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Closed on August 21, 2019

    Deobligate $11,781 in funds not yet spent on ineligible activities related to activities that exceeded contract terms and work with HUD to determine whether these funds can be reobligated to eligible activities

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1002-001-G
    Closed on September 18, 2020

    Develop and implement adequate policies and procedures to address the environmental deficiencies identified.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1002-001-H
    Closed on September 18, 2020

    Strengthen their policies and procedures to address the procurement and contract administration deficiencies identified.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1002-001-I
    Closed on September 18, 2020

    Strengthen their procedures to obligate capital funds in a timely manner.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1002-001-J
    Closed on September 18, 2020

    Provide technical assistance to Authority officials to ensure that responsible staff receives necessary procurement and environmental review training.