The Office of Community Development, City of Holyoke, Massachusetts, Did Not Award HOME Set-Aside Funds to a Qualified Community Housing Development Organization
We initiated an audit of the City of Holyoke, Massachusetts, Office of Community Development's (City) award and use of HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) program set-aside funds as part of our annual audit plan. Our objective was to determine whether the City ensured that Contemporary Apartments, Inc. (Contemporary Apartments), met community development housing organization (CHDO) qualification requirements and whether the related CHDO project…
May 13, 2009
Report
#2009-BO-1008
The Jonesboro Housing Authority Generally Complied with Housing Quality Standards Inspections Requirements although Certain Weaknesses Existed
We audited the Jonesboro Housing Authority's (Authority) Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program as part of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Office of Inspector General's (OIG) annual audit plan. Our objective was to determine whether the Authority's Section 8 housing choice voucher units met HUD standards.
The Authority's Section 8 units generally met housing quality standards. Our inspection of 16 Section 8 units…
April 22, 2009
Report
#2009-AT-1006
Quincy Housing Authority, Quincy, Massachusetts, Housing Choice Voucher Program Needs to Improve Controls over Its Interprogram Fund Transactions, Procurement, and Travel
We audited the Housing Choice Voucher program (Voucher program) at the Quincy Housing Authority (Authority) as part of our annual audit plan. Our efforts focused on whether the Authority (1) ensured that its Section 8 administrative plan met the requirements of 24 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 982.54, (2) adequately accounted for its indirect cost charges, (3) used Voucher program funds only for the administration of the program and whether…
April 08, 2009
Report
#2009-BO-1006
The City of Augusta, Georgia, Did Not Comply with HOME Monitoring Requirements
HUD OIG performed an audit of the City of Augusta's HOME Investment Partnerships program as part of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's annual audit plan. The purpose of the audit was to determine whether the City complied with HOME program requirements for monitoring (1) HOME community housing development organizations and subrecipients and (2) the use of CHDOs' proceeds. This is the second of two audit reports on the HOME…
March 31, 2009
Report
#2009-AT-1005
The City of Augusta Georgia Needs to Improve Controls Over its Community Development Block Grant Facade Program
HUD OIG performed an audit of the City of Augusta's Community Development Block Grant Facade Rehabilitation Grant program due to concerns of mismanagement and abuse regarding the City's program. The purpose of the audit was to determine whether the City's facade program complied with federal requirements and whether program activities met the national objectives of the CDBG program
The City did not have adequate controls over its financial…
February 08, 2009
Report
#2009-AT-1002
The Taunton Housing Authority, Taunton, Massachusetts, Needs to Improve Accounting for Its Interprogram Funds
We audited the Housing Choice Voucher (Voucher) program at the Taunton Housing Authority (Authority) as part of our annual audit plan. The overall audit objective was to determine whether the Authority efficiently administered its Voucher program in compliance with its annual contributions contract and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations. Our specific objectives were to determine whether the Authority used Voucher…
September 30, 2008
Report
#2009-BO-1001
Corrective Action Verification Housing Authority of the City of Cutbert, Georgia Public Housing Programs Audit Report 2004-AT-1001
HUD OIG performed corrective action verification for an audit recommendation cited in the audit report, Cuthbert Housing Authority, Public Housing Programs (2004-AT-1001) issued January 15, 2004. The purpose of the corrective action verification was to determine whether the selected audit recommendation was implemented and expended its funds in accordance with HUD regulations.
The Authority did not comply with its HUD-approved agreement to…
September 29, 2008
Memorandum
#2008-AT-0803
Meridian Lending, Inc., Monroe, Georgia, Did Not Follow HUD Requirements in Originating Two Insured Loans
HUD OIG audited Meridian Lending, Inc., a Federal Housing Administration (FHA)-approved direct endorsement lender. The objectives were to determine whether it followed the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) requirements for (1) borrower eligibility and creditworthiness and property eligibility when underwriting loans and (2) implementing a quality control program.
Meridian did not follow HUD requirements in originating two…
July 24, 2008
Report
#2008-AT-1010
The City of Augusta, Georgia, Controls Over Its HOME Program Were Inadequate
HUD OIG audited the City of Augusta's HOME Investment Partnerships program. The audit was part of the activities in the fiscal year 2007 annual audit plan. The objectives were to determine whether the City complied with HOME program requirements for commitments, production and completion of project activities, and eligibility and support of project costs.
The City's controls over its HOME program were inadequate. As a result, more than $1…
June 08, 2008
Report
#2008-AT-1009
Fulton County, Georgia, Lacked Adequate Controls Over Its HOME Program
As part of HUD OIG's strategic plan, we audited Fulton County's (County) HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) program. Our audit objectives were to determine whether the County complied with HOME program requirements for review and approval of project activities, commitments, completion of project activities, eligibility and reasonableness of project costs, and matching funds.
The County did not properly manage its HOME program and consistently…
March 05, 2008
Report
#2008-AT-1006
Office of Multifamily Housing Boston Hub Staff Effectively Used Contract Fee Inspectors
We reviewed the use of contract fee inspectors by the Office of Multifamily Housing Boston Hub (Boston Hub) as part of our 2007 annual audit plan. This review was initiated because U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) staff rely on contract fee inspectors to oversee the work of contractors performing renovation work on HUD-insured properties. Our objective was to determine whether the Boston Hub effectively used contract fee…
February 12, 2008
Report
#2008-BO-0001
The Atalanta Office of Public and Indian Housing Did Not Ensure That the Housing Authority of DeKalb County Accurately Implemented Its Memorandum of Agreement
As part of HUD OIG's strategic plan, an audit was conducted of HUD's Atlanta Office of Public and Indian Housing oversight of the Housing Authority of DeKalb County's compliance with its memorandum of agreement. The primary objective was to determine whether Public Housing adequately monitored the Authority's implementation of operating improvements required in the agreement. Specifically, the objective was to determine whether Public Housing…
January 08, 2008
Report
#2008-AT-0001
The City of Chicopee, Massachusetts, Did Not Properly Administer More Than $4.3 Million in Community Development Block Grant Funds
November 05, 2007
Report
#2008-BO-1001
Holyoke Housing Authority, Holyoke, MA Needs to Improve Its Internal Controls over the Voucher Program, Cost Allocations and Transfers
We audited the Housing Choice Voucher program (Voucher program) at the Holyoke Housing Authority (Authority) as part of our fiscal year 2007 annual audit plan. The objective of the audit was to determine whether the Authority administered the Voucher program in accordance with its annual contributions contracts and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements. Our efforts focused on whether the Authority properly (1)…
August 28, 2007
Report
#2007-BO-1008
The City of Fall River, MA, Generally Administered Its Block Grant and HOME Programs in Accordance with HUD Requirements
We reviewed the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) programs administered by the Community Development Agency, City of Fall River, Massachusetts (City) as part of our annual audit plan.
Our audit objective was to determine whether the City administered its CDBG and HOME programs in compliance with U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements. We focused on whether the City: (1…
August 23, 2007
Report
#2007-BO-1007
The Housing Authority of DeKalb County, Decatur, Georgia, Section 8 Units Generally Met Housing Quality Standards
April 29, 2007
Report
#2007-AT-1008
The City of New Bedford, Massachusetts, Did Not Meet Certain Requirements of HUD's Community Development Block Grant Program
As part of our annual plan, we audited the Office of Housing and Community Development, City of New Bedford, Massachusetts' (City) administration of its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)) and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) programs. Our audit objective was to determine whether the City complied with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations in administering its CDBG and HOME programs.
The City generally…
April 22, 2007
Report
#2007-BO-1005
The Housing Authority of DeKalb County, Decatur, Georgia, Did Not Adequately Monitor Contract Payments
April 09, 2007
Report
#2007-AT-1006
The Office of Community Development, City of Chicopee, Massachusetts, Did Not Properly Award and Administer Community Development Block Grant and HOME Funds Used for its Housing Activities
As part of our annual plan, we audited the Office of Community Development, City of Chicopee, Massachusetts' (City) administration of its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME programs. The objective of the audit was to evaluate the City's administration of its housing rehabilitation contracts funded through the CDBG or HOME programs and its oversight and monitoring of various for-profit developers (developers) involved in the…
March 20, 2007
Report
#2007-BO-1003
Gwinnett County, Georgia, Subrecipients Did Not Provide Funds Required by Their Contracts
January 29, 2007
Report
#2007-AT-1003