The Anaheim Housing Authority, Anaheim, California, Did Not Always Operate Its Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program Effectively
We audited the Anaheim Housing Authority’s (Authority) tenant eligibility and reexamination policies and procedures for its Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program (program). The objective of the audit was to determine whether the Authority followed HUD rules and regulations in determining tenant eligibility, rent calculations, and rent reasonableness. Although we did not identify any tenants that were not eligible for the Authority’s program…
January 15, 2008
Report
#2008-LA-1005
The City of Los Angeles Housing Department Did Not Adequately Monitor HOME Program-Assisted Rehabilitation Construction
We audited the City of Los Angeles Housing Department’s (Department) single-family and small multifamily property rehabilitation programs funded by the HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME program) as part of our annual audit plan. The objectives of our audit were to determine whether the Department (1) effectively monitored construction bids, costs, and quality; (2) ensured that borrowers and properties met eligibility requirements for…
January 14, 2008
Report
#2008-LA-1004
HUD’s Quality Assurance Division Did Not Always Resolve Materially Deficient or Potentially Fraudulent Loans Consistently
HUD OIG audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Quality Assurance Division because the results of some previous OIG audits indicated that the Quality Assurance Division might not have consistently followed its requirements.
Our objective was to determine whether HUD's Quality Assurance Division consistently required Federal Housing Administration (FHA)-approved lenders to indemnify loans with similar…
January 13, 2008
Report
#2008-KC-0001
The City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Did Not Properly Administer ItsCommunity Development Block Grant Program
HUD OIG audited the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program administered by the City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida (City). The objective of the audit was to determine whether the City administered its CDBG program in accordance with applicable U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements. The City did not administer its CDBG program in accordance with applicable HUD requirements.
It did not provide supporting…
January 10, 2008
Report
#2008-AT-1005
The Atalanta Office of Public and Indian Housing Did Not Ensure That the Housing Authority of DeKalb County Accurately Implemented Its Memorandum of Agreement
As part of HUD OIG's strategic plan, an audit was conducted of HUD's Atlanta Office of Public and Indian Housing oversight of the Housing Authority of DeKalb County's compliance with its memorandum of agreement. The primary objective was to determine whether Public Housing adequately monitored the Authority's implementation of operating improvements required in the agreement. Specifically, the objective was to determine…
January 09, 2008
Report
#2008-AT-0001
The Akron Metropolitan Housing Authority, Akron, Ohio, Lacked Adequate Controls over Its 5(h) Homeownership Proceeds
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Office of Inspector General audited the Akron Metropolitan Housing Authority's (Authority) 5(h) homeownership program (program). We selected the Authority based on a risk analysis showing that it may have improperly used program funds. Our objectives were to determine whether the Authority properly accounted for and used its program's proceeds in accordance with…
January 08, 2008
Report
#2008-CH-1002
The City of West Palm Beach, FL, Did Not Properly Administer Its Community Development Block Grant Program
HUD OIG audited the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program administered by the City of West Palm Beach, Florida (City). The objective of the audit was to determine whether the City administered its CDBG program in accordance with applicable U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements.
The City failed to properly administer its CDBG program in accordance with HUD requirements. Specifically, the City was deficient…
January 08, 2008
Report
#2008-AT-1004
Housing Authority of McKinney, McKinney, Texas, Inappropriately Advanced Funds and Transferred Real Estate to Its Not-for-Profit Affiliate
Based on a hotline complaint, we audited the Housing Authority of the City of McKinney (Authority). Our objective was to determine whether the Authority's transactions with its affiliated nonprofit, the McKinney Housing Opportunity Corporation (Corporation), complied with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements.
In violation of its annual contributions contract, the Authority inappropriately provided $915,487 in…
January 06, 2008
Report
#2008-FW-1005
HUD's Monitoring Controls and Procedures Regarding the Community Development Block Grant Program Were Not Adequate
We audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) administration of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. Our audit objectives were to determine whether HUD (1) had a system to measure the impact and outcome of its significant investment in grantees, which specifically determined whether (a) investments demonstrated increases in neighborhood health and (b) the primary CDBG objective of developing viable…
December 30, 2007
Report
#2008-NY-0001
The City of Jacksonville, FL Lacked Proper Support for Some Subrecipients Purchases and Expenditures
We reviewed the City of Jacksonville/County of Duval, Florida's (City) Community Development Block Grant program (CDBG). We conducted the review as part of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of the Inspector General's annual audit plan. Our objectives were to determine whether the City complied with CDBG regulations and requirements related to (a) use of competition when purchasing goods and services, (b…
December 25, 2007
Report
#2008-AT-1003
The Housing Authority of Baltimore City, Baltimore, Maryland, Generally Had Adequate Controls over Its Tenant Files
We audited the Housing Authority of Baltimore City's (Authority) administration of its leased housing under its Moving to Work Demonstration (Moving to Work) program. We conducted the audit based on our analysis of various risk factors relating to the housing authorities under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Baltimore field office. This is the first of two audit reports to be issued on…
December 18, 2007
Report
#2008-PH-1004
The State of Louisiana, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Road Home Program, ICF, Did Not Always Provide Contract Deliverables as Required
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's Office of Inspector General audited the State of Louisiana's (State) Road Home program (Road Home) housing manager's performance under a contract worth more than $750 million. The State is a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) disaster recovery grantee under the Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2006. We initiated the audit in conjunction with the Office of…
December 18, 2007
Report
#2008-AO-1001
Community Development Corporation of Brownsville, Brownsville, Texas, Did Not Use Its Housing Counseling Grants for the Intended Purpose
We audited the Community Development Corporation of Brownsville, Inc. (Corporation), at the request of the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) San Antonio Director of Community Planning and Development. Our objective was to determine whether the Corporation correctly charged administrative costs to its various federal funding sources. We expanded our objective to also determine whether the Corporation used housing…
December 17, 2007
Report
#2008-FW-1004
Homes for Life Foundation, Los Angeles, California, Did Not Properly Administer Its Supportive Housing Program Grants
We audited Homes for Life Foundation (Foundation) as a result of on-site audit work performed as part of a separate audit of the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority's (Authority) administration of Supportive Housing Program funds. Our audit objective was to determine whether the Foundation applied and tracked its HUD Supportive Housing Program cash match in accordance with applicable requirements. The Foundation did not administer its…
December 17, 2007
Report
#2008-LA-1003
Homes for Life Foundation, Los Angeles, California, Did Not Properly Administer Its Supportive Housing Program Grants
December 17, 2007
Report
#2008-LA-1003
The Dallas Housing Authority, Dallas, Texas, Mismanaged its Portable Vouchers
As part of our strategic plan objective to assist the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) efforts to reduce rental assistance overpayments, we audited the portability features of the Dallas Housing Authority's (Authority) Housing Choice Voucher program. Our objective was to determine whether the Authority administered portability in accordance with HUD requirements.
The Authority mismanaged its portable vouchers…
December 04, 2007
Report
#2008-FW-1003
Richard A. Hutchens Associates, Management Agent, Buffalo, New York, Used Project Funds for Ineligible and/or Unsupported Cost
We completed an audit of Richard A. Hutchens and Associates (agent) pertaining to its management of the financial operations of Cayuga Village and Touraine Apartments. The objectives of our audit were to determine whether the agent used project funds in accordance with the regulatory agreement and HUD requirements. Specifically, to determine whether the agent (1) provided adequate documentation to support the reasonableness of payments made to…
December 04, 2007
Report
#2008-NY-1002
HUD Had a Less Than 1 Percent Error Rate in Housing Ineligible Participants for KDHAP and DVP Disaster Housing Assistance
We audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Katrina Disaster Housing Assistance Program (KDHAP) and Disaster Voucher Program (DVP) administered by public housing agencies. We initiated the audit as part of our examination of relief efforts provided by the federal government in the aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Our audit objectives were to determine whether HUD (1) properly determined the eligibility of…
December 03, 2007
Report
#2008-AO-0001
The Housing Authority of the City of Napa Did Not Adequately Determine and Support Section 8 Rents
In response to a hotline complaint, we reviewed the Housing Authority of the City of Napa's (the Authority) Section 8 program. The purpose was to determine whether concerns raised in the complaint relating to misappropriation of Section 8 funds had merit and whether allegations of improper rent increases for the Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Single Room Occupancy (Mod Rehab) and Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher programs were valid.
We…
November 29, 2007
Report
#2008-LA-1002
The Housing Authority of the City of Napa Did Not Adequately Determine and Support Section 8 Rents
November 29, 2007
Report
#2008-LA-1002