The Offices of Audit and Evaluation supervise and conduct independent and objective audits, evaluations, and other reviews of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) programs and activities to ensure they operate economically, efficiently, and effectively. This page contains links to our audit and evaluation reports and memoranda.
The Jacksonville Housing Authority, Jacksonville, Arkansas, Mismanaged Public Housing Capital Fund Program Funding
March 30, 2007
Report
#2007-FW-1007
The Puerto Rico Department of Housing, San Juan, Puerto Rico, Did Not Effectively Administer Its Section 8 Housing Program
March 29, 2007
Report
#2007-AT-1005
The Housing Authority of the City of Gary, Indiana, Lacked Adequate Controls over Refunding Savings
March 23, 2007
Report
#2007-CH-1005
The Office of Community Development, City of Chicopee, Massachusetts, Did Not Properly Award and Administer Community Development Block Grant and HOME Funds Used for its Housing Activities
As part of our annual plan, we audited the Office of Community Development, City of Chicopee, Massachusetts' (City) administration of its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME programs. The objective of the audit was to evaluate the City's administration of its housing rehabilitation contracts funded through the CDBG or HOME programs and its oversight and monitoring of various for-profit developers (developers)…
March 21, 2007
Report
#2007-BO-1003
The State of Nebraska Did Not Close HOME Projects in a Timely Manner
March 13, 2007
Report
#2007-KC-1005
Peregrine Health Management Company Used Project Funds for Ineleigible, Unsupported, and/or Unnecessary Costs
March 12, 2007
Report
#2007-NY-1003
The Wilmington Housing Authority, Wilmington, North Carolina, Needs to Improve Internal Controls Over Its Program
March 08, 2007
Report
#2007-AT-1004
Cheyenne Housing Authority in Cheyenne, Wyoming, Improperly Awarded Its Administration and Management Contract
HUD-OIG reviewed the Cheyenne Housing Authority's (Authority) administration and management contract with Housing Operations and Management, Incorporated (contractor), to determine whether the Authority awarded the contract in accordance with federal procurement requirements.
The Authority did not follow federal procurement requirements and its own procurement policy when it awarded its administration and management contract to the…
March 04, 2007
Report
#2007-DE-1004
Chapter 5 - Insured Development Cost Certification Audit Guidance
February 28, 2007
Single Audit Guidance
#
The Lusk Housing Authority in Lusk, Wyoming, Improperly Awarded Its Administration and Management Contract
February 26, 2007
Report
#2007-DE-1002
The Buffalo Housing Authority in Buffalo, Wyoming, Improperly Awarded Its Administration and Management Contract
February 26, 2007
Report
#2007-DE-1003
The Newport News Redevelopment and Housing Authority, Newport News, Virginia, Did Not Always Follow HUD Requirements
February 19, 2007
Report
#2007-PH-1005
Oakland Housing Authority Did Not Comply with Procurement and Contracting Requirements
February 13, 2007
Report
#2007-LA-1005
The Housing Authority of the City of Evansville, Indiana, Needs to Improve Its Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program Administration
February 12, 2007
Report
#2007-CH-1003
Gwinnett County, Georgia, Subrecipients Did Not Provide Funds Required by Their Contracts
January 30, 2007
Report
#2007-AT-1003