Union County, NJ'S HOME Investment Partnerships Program Was Not Always Administered in Compliance With Program Requirements
We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Newark, NJ, Office of Community Planning and Development instruct County officials to strengthen the County’s administrative controls to ensure that its HOME program is reimbursed for assistance spent on terminated or noncompliant activities.
Union County, NJ'S HOME Investment Partnerships Program Was Not Always Administered in Compliance With Program Requirements
We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Newark, NJ, Office of Community Planning and Development instruct County officials to provide environmental review documentation, such as environmental assessment and a phase I environmental review, for the activity to support compliance with environmental review requirements.
Union County, NJ'S HOME Investment Partnerships Program Was Not Always Administered in Compliance With Program Requirements
We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Newark, NJ, Office of Community Planning and Development instruct County officials to provide procurement documentation, such as proof of advertising, bids received, bid analysis reports, contracts, and other documents, for contracts associated with the three activities to support compliance with procurement requirements.
Union County, NJ'S HOME Investment Partnerships Program Was Not Always Administered in Compliance With Program Requirements
We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Newark, NJ, Office of Community Planning and Development instruct County officials to provide disbursement documentation to support the eligibility of the $435,094 made for the two activities or repay the County’s HOME program line of credit from non-Federal source.
Union County, NJ'S HOME Investment Partnerships Program Was Not Always Administered in Compliance With Program Requirements
We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Newark, NJ, Office of Community Planning and Development instruct County officials to impose deed restrictions or other mechanisms approved by HUD on the two properties that received HOME assistance of $597,519 to enforce affordability requirements during the affordability period.
Union County, NJ'S HOME Investment Partnerships Program Was Not Always Administered in Compliance With Program Requirements
We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Newark, NJ, Office of Community Planning and Development instruct County officials to provide documentation to support that laborers associated with the activity are compensated in compliance with Davis-Bacon wage rates. If documentation cannot be provided, $567,767 needs to be reimbursed to the County’s HOME line of credit from non-Federal sources.
Union County, NJ'S HOME Investment Partnerships Program Was Not Always Administered in Compliance With Program Requirements
We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Newark, NJ, Office of Community Planning and Development instruct County officials to strengthen the County’s administrative controls to ensure compliance with environmental, procurement, and other program requirements.
Union County, NJ'S HOME Investment Partnerships Program Was Not Always Administered in Compliance With Program Requirements
We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Newark, NJ, Office of Community Planning and Development instruct County officials to provide HOME program training to County staff to ensure compliance with HOME program requirements.
Union County, NJ'S HOME Investment Partnerships Program Was Not Always Administered in Compliance With Program Requirements
We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Newark, NJ, Office of Community Planning and Development instruct County officials to reallocate the $573,689 awarded to the ineligible CHDO, thus ensure that the fund is put to better use.
Union County, NJ'S HOME Investment Partnerships Program Was Not Always Administered in Compliance With Program Requirements
We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Newark, NJ, Office of Community Planning and Development instruct County officials to reimburse $242,269 to the County’s HOME program line of credit for CHDO reserve fund disbursed to the ineligible CHDO.
Union County, NJ'S HOME Investment Partnerships Program Was Not Always Administered in Compliance With Program Requirements
We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Newark, NJ, Office of Community Planning and Development instruct County officials to provide documentation to support that at least one-third of the Homefirst board were representatives of a low-income community. If documentation cannot be provided, reimburse the $227,903 to the County’s HOME program line of credit from non-Federal sources.
Union County, NJ'S HOME Investment Partnerships Program Was Not Always Administered in Compliance With Program Requirements
We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Newark, NJ, Office of Community Planning and Development instruct County officials to reimburse the $536,507 in program income to the County’s HOME program local bank account and record the income in IDIS.
Union County, NJ'S HOME Investment Partnerships Program Was Not Always Administered in Compliance With Program Requirements
We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Newark, NJ, Office of Community Planning and Development instruct County officials to reconcile the County’s carryover balance of HOME match as of September 30, 2015, for the ineligible HOME match contributions and the understated HOME match contributions.
Union County, NJ'S HOME Investment Partnerships Program Was Not Always Administered in Compliance With Program Requirements
We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Newark, NJ, Office of Community Planning and Development instruct County officials to disburse the $92,557 to pay eligible HOME costs before making additional drawdowns from LOCCS.
Union County, NJ'S HOME Investment Partnerships Program Was Not Always Administered in Compliance With Program Requirements
We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Newark, NJ, Office of Community Planning and Development instruct County officials to strengthen the County’s financial controls over reconciling bank records to ensure that HOME funds in the local bank account are spent before drawdowns are made from LOCCS.
Union County, NJ'S HOME Investment Partnerships Program Was Not Always Administered in Compliance With Program Requirements
We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Newark, NJ, Office of Community Planning and Development instruct County officials to provide documentation, such as pay stubs and leases, to support compliance with HOME program rent limit and income eligibility requirements for the six tenants who occupied HOME-assisted units.
Union County, NJ'S HOME Investment Partnerships Program Was Not Always Administered in Compliance With Program Requirements
We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Newark, NJ, Office of Community Planning and Development instruct County officials to provide documents, such as pay stubs and bank statements, to support the eligibility of the two home buyers. If documentation cannot be provided, reimburse $260,736 from non-Federal sources to the County’s HOME program line of credit.
Union County, NJ'S HOME Investment Partnerships Program Was Not Always Administered in Compliance With Program Requirements
We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Newark, NJ, Office of Community Planning and Development instruct County officials to strengthen the County’s administrative controls to ensure that County staff adequately monitors its subgrantee for compliance with HOME program requirements and provide HOME program training to the County subgrantee’s staff.
Final Civil Action: Primary Residential Mortgage, Inc., Settled Allegations of Failing To Comply With HUD's Federal Housing Administration Loan Requirements
Acknowledge that $3,129,000 of the $5 million in the attached settlement agreement represents an amount due HUD.
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Did Not Always Prevent Program Participants From Receiving Multiple Subsidies
Require public housing agencies to run the Enterprise Income Verification existing tenant search during the admission process and retain the results in the tenant file, which would avoid unnecessary costs to HUD’s subsidy programs, allowing an estimated $935,283 to be put to better use.