Prudential Huntoon Paige Associates, LTD, Did Not Underwrite and Process a $19.9 Million Loan in Accordance With HUD Requirements
We audited Prudential Huntoon Paige Associates, LTD’s underwriting of a $19.9 million mortgage loan to develop Amaranth at 544, a senior multifamily project located in Lewisville, TX. We initiated the review based on the early default, assignment, and significant amount of the project. Our objective was to determine whether Prudential underwrote and processed the loan for Amaranth according to the U.S. Department of Housing and…
June 30, 2015
Report
#2015-AT-1003
The City of New Orleans, LA, Did Not Always Comply With Requirements When Administering Its 2013 Disaster Relief Grant
We audited the City of New Orleans’ Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) assistance funds awarded to the City as a result of damages caused by Hurricane Isaac. Our objective was to determine whether the City maintained adequate procurement controls and financial management systems and administered its CDBG-DR funds in accordance with Federal guidelines, HUD regulations, and other requirements.
We found that the…
June 26, 2015
Report
#2015-FW-1002
The Lower Manhattan Development Corporation, New York, NY, Generally Administered CDBG Disaster Recovery Assistance Funds in Accordance With HUD Regulations
We performed the 19th review of the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation’s (LMDC) administration of the $2.783 billion in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Disaster Recovery Assistance funds awarded to the State of New York in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City. The objective of the audit was to determine whether LMDC disbursed CDBG Disaster Recovery Assistance…
June 26, 2015
Report
#2015-NY-1008
HUD's Office of Affordable Housing Programs Could Improve Its Oversight of Participating Jurisdictions' HOME Investment Partnerships Program-Funded Rental Housing Projects' Leases
We reviewed the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Office of Affordable Housing Programs’ oversight of leases in HOME Investment Partnerships Program-funded rental housing projects. The review was part of the activities in our fiscal year 2015 annual audit plan. Our objective was to determine whether HUD’s Office had adequate oversight of participating jurisdictions to ensure that leases between rental projects…
June 25, 2015
Memorandum
#2015-CH-0801
SAR 73 - Semiannual Report to Congress for period ending March 31, 2015
The Inspector General Act of 1978 requires the Inspector General to prepare semiannual reports summarizing the activities of the Office of Inspector General for the preceding six-month periods. The semiannual reports are intended to keep the Secretary and the Congress fully informed of significant findings, progress the Agency has made and recommendations for improvement.
June 23, 2015
Semiannual report
#SAR_73
HUD Did Not Adequately Implement or Provide Adequate Oversight To Ensure Compliance With Environmental Requirements
We audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) implementation and oversight of compliance with environmental requirements as part of the HUD Office of Inspector General’s annual audit plan to contribute to improving HUD’s execution of and accountability for its fiscal responsibilities. Our objective was to determine whether HUD, specifically its Offices of Housing; Public Housing, and Native American Programs…
June 16, 2015
Report
#2015-FW-0001
Potential Antideficiency Act Violation HOME Investment Partnerships Program
We conducted further analysis of our reported findings in fiscal years 2013 and 2014 that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) formula grant accounting did not comply with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), resulting in misstatements on the financial statements, and that HUD did not comply with the HOME Investment Partnership Act (also known as the HOME Statute). The additional analysis was performed…
June 16, 2015
Memorandum
#2015-FO-0801
Weaknesses in the New Core Project Were Not Adequately Addressed
We audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) New Core Project as part of the internal control assessments required for the fiscal year 2015 financial statement audit under the Chief Financial Officer’s Act of 1990. Our objective was to assess the status of the project and to determine whether the New Core Project team complied with Federal regulations and departmental project management processes. This…
June 12, 2015
Report
#2015-DP-0006
The City of New York, NY, Did Not Always Disburse Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery Funds in Accordance With Federal Regulations
We completed a review of the City of New York, Office of Management and Budget’s administration of the Business Loan and Grant Program funded with Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) funds provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to assist in the disaster recovery and rebuilding efforts resulting from Hurricane Sandy. The objectives of the audit were to determine whether the City (1…
June 12, 2015
Report
#2015-NY-1007
The Housing Authority of Bexar County, TX, Did Not Operate Its HUD Public Housing Programs in Accordance With Regulations and Other Requirements
Because of an anonymous complaint, we reviewed the Housing Authority of Bexar County, TX. The complaint included allegations of improper procurement, improper use of Authority funds, misuse of the Authority’s credit card, and violations of Housing Choice Voucher regulations. Our objective was to determine whether the Authority operated its public housing and Housing Choice Voucher programs in accordance with the U.S. Department of…
June 11, 2015
Memorandum
#2015-FW-1806
The State of New Jersey Did Not Comply With Federal Procurement and Cost Principle Requirements in Implementing Its Disaster Management System
We audited the State of New Jersey’s Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery-funded Sandy Integrated Recovery Operations and Management System. We conducted the audit based on the significant amount of funds associated with the system and the importance of the system to the successful implementation of the State’s Disaster Recovery grant. Our objective was to determine whether the State procured services and products for…
June 04, 2015
Report
#2015-PH-1003
The Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA, Used Shelter Plus Care Program Funds for Ineligible and Unsupported Participants
We audited the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino’s Shelter Plus Care program due to a public complaint alleging that the Authority disregarded U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) program requirements related to participants’ eligibility. Our objective was to determine whether the Authority administered its program funds in accordance with HUD rules and requirements, specifically related to participants’…
May 29, 2015
Report
#2015-LA-1004
NTFN, Inc., Did Not Always Follow HUD and FHA Requirements
We reviewed NTFN, Inc., based on the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) goal to protect the integrity of the Federal Housing Administration’s (FHA) housing insurance and guarantee programs. We selected NTFN because its loan default rate was the second highest in the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area from July 2012 through June 2014. NTFN originated 3,046 FHA loans in the…
May 26, 2015
Report
#2015-FW-1001
The State of Wyoming Did Not Always Administer Its CDBG Program in Accordance With Applicable Requirements
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Inspector General audited the State of Wyoming’s Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program run by the Wyoming Business Council. Our audit objective was to determine whether the State reimbursed only approved costs, its grant agreements contained all required language, it properly monitored its projects, and it ensured that projects met the national objective in…
May 26, 2015
Report
#2015-DE-1001
First Niagara Bank, Lockport, NY, Did Not Always Properly Implement HUD’s Loss Mitigation Requirements in Servicing FHA-Insured Mortgages
We completed a review of First Niagara Bank’s servicing of Federal Housing Administration (FHA)-insured mortgages and its implementation of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Loss Mitigation program. We selected First Niagara Bank based on an Office of Inspector General risk assessment of single-family lenders. The objective of the audit was to determine whether First Niagara Bank properly serviced FHA-…
May 22, 2015
Report
#2015-NY-1006
HUD Did Not Comply With IPERA Due to Significant Deficiencies in Its Reporting and Risk Assessment Processes
We audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) fiscal year 2014 compliance with the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010 (IPERA) in accordance with the requirements of IPERA. Our audit objectives were to (1) determine HUD’s compliance with IPERA reporting and improper payments reduction requirements; (2) determine whether HUD’s reporting of improper payments data, including the agency’s…
May 15, 2015
Report
#2015-FO-0005
The Bucks County Housing Authority, Doylestown, PA, Did Not Always Ensure That Its Program Units Met Housing Quality Standards
We audited the Bucks County Housing Authority’s Housing Choice Voucher program because the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) authorized it more than $15 million per year in fiscal years 2012 to 2014 and we had not audited its housing quality standards inspection program. Our audit objective was to determine whether the Authority ensured that its Housing Choice Voucher program units met HUD’s housing quality standards…
May 05, 2015
Report
#2015-PH-1002
The City of Paterson, NJ’s HOME Investment Partnerships Program Controls Did Not Ensure Compliance With Regulations
We audited the City of Paterson, NJ’s HOME Investment Partnerships Program based on a risk analysis of the City’s program that considered the amount of funding, the risk score assigned by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), our identification of potential issues, and Congress’ general interest in the HOME program. The objective of the audit was to determine whether City officials had established and implemented…
April 30, 2015
Report
#2015-NY-1005
Memorandum Report on HUD’s Processes used to Report Information Technology Investments on IT Dashboard
The Office of Evaluation performed preliminary research of the HUD Office of the Chief Information Officer’s (OCIO) management of the agency’s reporting of financial and project information on the Federal IT Dashboard (Dashboard). The objective of the evaluation was to determine if OCIO processes ensured accurate IT investment information was reported on the Dashboard. We found that project managers did not consistently follow…
April 29, 2015
Report
#2014-OE-0007
Sutton Irvine Residence, Inc., Irvine, CA, Did Not Operate Its Section 202 - Funded Project in Accordance With HUD Rules and Requirements
We audited Sutton Irvine Residence, Inc.’s Section 202-funded project based on concerns expressed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Office of General Counsel, Departmental Enforcement Center, regarding the management of the project. The concern was that Sutton Irvine had defaulted on its mortgage payments to HUD and may have diverted project funds for nonproject expenses. Our audit objective was to…
April 24, 2015
Report
#2015-LA-1003