U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Exportar
Date Issued

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1002-001-I
    Closed on Noviembre 20, 2018

    Ensure that it obtains a separate interest-bearing depository account for its program participants’ escrow funds in accordance with HUD’s requirements.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1002-001-J
    Closed on Noviembre 07, 2018

    Ensure that its staff is appropriately trained and familiar with HUD’s requirements and its program action plan regarding the administration of its program to ensure that (1) participants’ contracts of participation and individual training and services plans are properly updated and contain the necessary signatures; (2) changes in participants’ files are properly identified and notated; and (3) participants are notified of changes in their monthly escrow deposits, total escrow balances, or both.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1002-001-K
    $127,544
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Closed on Noviembre 02, 2018

    Develop and implement procedures and controls to ensure that (1) documentation required by HUD and its own action plan is correctly completed, documented, and updated; (2) escrow account balances are correctly calculated and disbursed; and (3) escrow accounts and disbursements are fully supported to ensure that $127,544 in coordinator grant funds is appropriately used over the next year.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1002-001-L
    $387,507
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on Marzo 28, 2019

    Determine the amount of the $387,507 in coordinator grant funds that was appropriately earned by the Authority for meeting requirements. The funds that are determined to be unearned should be reimbursed to HUD from non-Federal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1002-001-M
    Closed on Noviembre 07, 2018

    Review the Authority’s graduate documentation and adjust the Authority’s minimum program size as necessary.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1002-001-N
    Closed on Marzo 28, 2019

    Review the Authority’s Section Eight Management Assessment Program scores for the Family Self-Sufficiency program and adjust as necessary.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1002-001-O
    Closed on Diciembre 20, 2018

    Provide technical assistance and guidance to the Authority to ensure that it properly administers its Family Self-Sufficiency program.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1002-002-A
    $34,666
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on Diciembre 10, 2019

    Reimburse its program $34,666 from non-Federal funds ($21,990 $12,676 in administrative fees) for the overpayment of housing assistance due to inappropriate calculations of housing assistance.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1002-002-B
    $1,265
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Closed on Noviembre 18, 2019

    Reimburse the appropriate households $1,265 from program funds for the underpayment of housing assistance due to inappropriate calculations.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1002-002-C
    $9,644
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on Diciembre 10, 2019

    Pursue collection from the applicable households or reimburse its program $9,644 from non-Federal funds for the overpayment of housing assistance due to unreported or underreported income.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1002-002-D
    $1,666
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on Diciembre 10, 2019

    Support or reimburse its program $1,666 from non-Federal funds for the unsupported payments of housing assistance cited in this finding.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1002-002-E
    $322,550
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Closed on Noviembre 20, 2018

    Implement adequate procedures and controls to ensure that (1) housing assistance payments are appropriately calculated and supported, (2) repayment agreements are created to recover overpaid housing assistance when unreported income is discovered during the examination process, and (3) annual reexaminations are completed in a timely manner to ensure that $322,550 in program funds is appropriately used for future payments.

Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1009-001-A
    $574,930
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on Mayo 01, 2018

    We recommend that the Southwest Region Director of Multifamily Housing require Beverly Place’s owner to repay HUD $574,930 for subsidized units that were not occupied by qualified tenants. Repayment must be from non-Federal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1009-001-B
    $150,082
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on Septiembre 21, 2020

    We recommend that the Southwest Region Director of Multifamily Housing require Beverly Place’s owner to provide support to show that the subsidies for 11 tenants with falsified income were accurate or repay HUD $150,082 for those subsidies. Repayment must be from non-Federal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1009-001-C
    $77,621
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on Abril 07, 2020

    We recommend that the Southwest Region Director of Multifamily Housing require Beverly Place’s owner to provide support to show that the subsidies for 18 tenants without files or without adequate income documentation in their files were accurate or repay HUD $77,621 for those subsidies. Repayment must be from non-Federal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1009-001-D
    Closed on Febrero 25, 2020

    We further recommend that the Southwest Region Director of Multifamily Housing require its contract administrator for Beverly Place to verify that the owner’s recently implemented quality control program is working as designed.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1009-001-E
    Closed on Febrero 25, 2020

    We further recommend that the Southwest Region Director of Multifamily Housing ensure that the project-based contract administrator’s review process includes steps to obtain reasonable assurance that tenants being reported as subsidized at Beverly Place live in the subsidized units.

General Counsel

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1008-001-F
    Closed on Septiembre 05, 2019

    Take appropriate administrative sanctions, including suspension, limited denial of participation, or debarment, against the commissioners.

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1008-001-A
    $11,172
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on Febrero 27, 2018

    We recommend that the Director of the San Antonio Office of Public Housing require the Authority to repay from non-Federal funds $11,172 paid for ineligible travel costs of which $6,904 was Housing Choice Voucher and $4,268 was operating subsidy funds.

General Counsel

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-PH-1802-001-A
    $10,000
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Closed on Julio 12, 2024

    Acknowledge that the attached settlement agreement for $10,000 represents an amount due HUD.