U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Exportar
Date Issued

Enforcement Center

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-OE-0011-01

    Identify and implement a method to ensure that eligible RCFs receive database adjustments when appropriate under local code

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-OE-0011-02

    Identify and implement a method to ensure that HUD does not instruct facilities to negate safety features

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-OE-0011-03

    Identify and implement a method that ensures the expeditious followup inspection of RCFs

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1013-001-A
    $240,010
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Houston Office of Community Planning and Development require the Department to support the $240,010 in unsupported procurement payments or repay its CDBG program from non-Federal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1013-001-B
    $22,872
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Houston Office of Community Planning and Development require the Department to report $22,872 in program income to HUD and properly use program income.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1013-001-C
    $3,301
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Houston Office of Community Planning and Development require the Department to correct its HOME matching liability report to include the recalculated amount for 2014 and pay the matching liability of $3,301.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1013-001-D

    We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Houston Office of Community Planning and Development require the Department to confirm that it has developed and implemented written procurement procedures to ensure that future contracts and subrecipient agreements address the procurement and required provision issues identified in the report.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1013-001-E

    We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Houston Office of Community Planning and Development require the Department to ensure that all program files include required documentation and support.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1013-001-F

    We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Houston Office of Community Planning and Development require the Department to monitor subrecipients annually as stated in its monitoring policy.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1013-001-G

    We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Houston Office of Community Planning and Development require the Department to train its staff regarding HUD requirements and regulations or seek technical assistance.

Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-0004-001-A
    $120,902,564
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Revise servicing review and monitoring policies and procedures to emphasize increased controls on reviewing claim loans showing that no loss mitigation evaluation occurred. Revising the policies and procedures would reduce the risk to HUD and result in a projected $120,902,564 in funds to be put to better use (appendix A).

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-0004-001-B

    Develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure that the Office of Single Family Asset Management and Office of Lender Activities and Program Compliance communicate the results of their servicing reviews to each other.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-0004-001-C

    Update and revise policies and procedures, including reinforcement of guidance (for example, mortgagee letters, notifications to servicers, or training) to ensure that servicers accurately report the status of delinquent loans to HUD.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-0004-001-D
    $1,673,117
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Require indemnification for the 26 loans that had significant servicing deficiencies. In these cases, the loss to HUD was $1,673,117 (appendixes A and D).

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-0004-001-E

    Reinforce existing guidance (such as mortgagee letters, notifications to servicers, and training) to servicers to ensure that they engage in required loss mitigation.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-0004-001-F

    Require that the servicers with significant and other deficiencies revise and update their policies and procedures, as necessary, to ensure that they comply with HUD requirements and guidance on loss mitigation evaluation.

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1008-001-A
    $488,519
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Modify the recapture provisions of the 35 home-buyer assistance agreements totaling $488,519 to meet HUD recapture requirements relating to the sales price, closing costs, and net proceeds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1008-001-B

    Update its procedures to ensure that any additional home-buyer assistance agreements contain recapture provisions that meet HUD recapture requirements relating to the sales price, closing costs, and net proceeds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1008-001-C

    Train its staff to ensure that recapture amounts do not exceed net sales proceeds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1008-002-A
    $12,275
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Revise and implement written policies and procedures for managing and accurately tracking all NSP3 activity to ensure that the $12,275 in identified closing cost refunds and any additional refunds identified in recommendation 2B are not overpaid by recipients.