U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Exportar
Date Issued

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1010-003-A
    Closed on Agosto 28, 2018
    $507,218
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Albuquerque Office of Community Planning and Development require the City of Albuquerque’s Department of Family and Community Services to reimburse its CDBG line of credit for $507,218 in ineligible costs for its violation of its home rehabilitation policy and procedure when it exceeded the allowed maximum assistance per home with no cost justifications. Reimbursement must be from non-Federal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1010-003-B
    Closed on Agosto 28, 2018
    $110,647
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Albuquerque Office of Community Planning and Development require the City of Albuquerque’s Department of Family and Community Services to reimburse its CDBG line of credit for $110,647 in ineligible costs for the rehabilitation costs that exceeded the allowed HOME value limits. Reimbursement must be from non-Federal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1010-003-C
    Closed on Agosto 28, 2018
    $474
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Albuquerque Office of Community Planning and Development require the City of Albuquerque’s Department of Family and Community Services to reimburse its CDBG line of credit for $474 in ineligible costs for violation of Federal travel regulations. Reimbursement must be from non-Federal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1010-003-D
    Closed on Agosto 28, 2018
    $9,476
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Albuquerque Office of Community Planning and Development require the City of Albuquerque’s Department of Family and Community Services to reclassify the $9,476 to program administration and recalculate its cap to determine whether it exceeded the allowed 20 percent. Any amount that is over the allowed cap would be ineligible, and repayment of the overage amount to its CDBG line of credit would be required. Reimbursement must be from non-Federal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1010-003-E
    Closed on Agosto 28, 2018
    $69,254
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Albuquerque Office of Community Planning and Development require the City of Albuquerque’s Department of Family and Community Services to support payroll wages charged to the CDBG grant or repay $69,254 to its CDBG line of credit from non-Federal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1010-003-F
    Closed on Septiembre 13, 2018

    We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Albuquerque Office of Community Planning and Development require the City of Albuquerque’s Department of Family and Community Services to implement recommendations made from its internal and external auditors that will ensure compliance with applicable regulations related to cost reasonableness and eligibility and that costs are adequately supported.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1010-004-A
    Closed on Agosto 28, 2018
    $123,831
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Albuquerque Office of Community Planning and Development require the City of Albuquerque’s Department of Family and Community Services to support that subrecipient 1 met a national objective, environmental requirements, and client eligibility or repay $123,831 to its CDBG line of credit from non-Federal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1010-004-B
    Closed on Agosto 28, 2018
    $69,000
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Albuquerque Office of Community Planning and Development require the City of Albuquerque’s Department of Family and Community Services to support that subrecipient 2 met a national objective, environmental requirements, and client eligibility or repay $69,000 to its CDBG line of credit from non-Federal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1010-004-C
    Closed on Agosto 28, 2018
    $304,975
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Albuquerque Office of Community Planning and Development require the City of Albuquerque’s Department of Family and Community Services to support that subrecipient 3 met a national objective, environmental requirements, and client eligibility or repay $304,975 to its CDBG line of credit from non-Federal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1010-004-D
    Closed on Agosto 28, 2018
    $565
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Albuquerque Office of Community Planning and Development require the City of Albuquerque’s Department of Family and Community Services to reimburse its CDBG line of credit for $565 in ineligible costs for its failure to provide subrecipient oversight, which should have identified that the subrecipient had incorrectly applied eligibility requirements for homeless clients served. Reimbursement must be from non-Federal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1010-004-E
    Closed on Agosto 28, 2018
    $1,400
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Albuquerque Office of Community Planning and Development require the City of Albuquerque’s Department of Family and Community Services to reimburse its CDBG line of credit for $1,400 in ineligible costs for its failure to provide subrecipient oversight, which should have identified the ineligibility of clients whose income exceed the threshold as reported. Reimbursement must be from non-Federal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1010-004-F
    Closed on Septiembre 13, 2018

    We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Albuquerque Office of Community Planning and Development require the City of Albuquerque’s Department of Family and Community Services to develop and implement written CDBG policies and procedures, which detail the requirements, including but not limited to (1) meeting Federal procurement requirements, (2) executing written agreements for all subrecipients and contractors that meet minimum requirements, (3) documenting all conflicts of interest, (4) complying with HUD environmental review requirements, (5) maintaining documentation to support that its CDBG-funded projects met one or more national objectives, (6) properly and accurately monitoring subrecipients for compliance with all requirements, and (7) consistently and accurately reporting activities in IDIS.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1010-004-G
    Closed on Marzo 22, 2019

    We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Albuquerque Office of Community Planning and Development continue to classify the City of Albuquerque as a high risk grantee until such time as HUD has determined the City has implemented an effective program in compliance with all requirements.

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-PH-1005-001-A
    Closed on Marzo 05, 2021
    $987,500
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Repay HUD from non-Federal funds for the $987,500 disbursed to 21 home buyers who did not meet all of the program eligibility requirements.

Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1004-001-A
    Closed on Diciembre 05, 2017

    Implement adequate procedures and controls to ensure that it properly monitors the listing brokers to ensure compliance with its contract. The procedures and controls should include but not limited to performing quality control reviews and supervisory review of its brokers, and maintaining documentation of its quality control reviews and corrective actions.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1004-001-B
    Closed on Diciembre 05, 2017

    Update its quality control plan to include the performance of physical inspections of the properties in its inventory.

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1006-001-A
    Closed on Septiembre 27, 2022
    $6,529,501
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Support the eligibility of $6,529,500 in code enforcement costs, including meeting code enforcement requirements, preparing time distribution reports, and supporting vehicle costs, or repay the program from non-Federal funds (appendix D).

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1006-001-B
    Closed on Mayo 21, 2018

    Suspend funding to its code enforcement program until it can show that it has implemented controls, addressed its capacity issues, and understands and abides by HUD requirements.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1006-001-C
    Closed on Junio 29, 2018
    $4,565
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Repay the program $4,565 from non-Federal funds for ineligible code enforcement program costs.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1006-001-D
    Closed on Agosto 02, 2018
    $139,071
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Repay the program $139,071 from non-Federal funds for ineligible tire team code enforcement program costs.