U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Exportar
Date Issued

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-AT-1007-001-B
    $48,985
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Provide adequate support for expenses totaling $48,985. Any expenses that are not supported should be repaid to the appropriate NSP grant from non-Federal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-AT-1007-001-C

    Ensure that the Land Bank completes and clears all outstanding annual audits for fiscal years 2012 through 2016.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-AT-1007-001-D

    Ensure that the Land Bank develops and implements adequate financial and file management policies and procedures to ensure that files are auditable and financial records adequately identify the source and application of federally sponsored activities in accordance with Federal regulations.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-AT-1007-001-E
    $248,596
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Reprogram the remaining NSP1 funds of $219,851 and NSP3 funds of $28,745 to another subrecipient or developer or return the funds to the U.S. Treasury.

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1003-001-A
    $25,133
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Reimburse its program $25,133 ($17,174 in housing assistance payments $7,959 in associated administrative fees) from non-Federal funds for the overpayment of housing assistance and utility allowances due to inappropriate calculations.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1003-001-B
    $2,213
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Reimburse the appropriate households $2,213 from program administrative fee reserves for the underpayment of housing assistance due to inappropriate calculations.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1003-001-C

    Evaluate its administration of the program and take the appropriate actions to ensure that the program is managed effectively.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1003-001-D
    $32,960
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Implement adequate quality control procedures to ensure that it correctly calculates housing assistance payments to ensure that $32,960 in program funds is appropriately used for future payments.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1003-002-A
    $25,231
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Reimburse its program $25,231($15,061 in inappropriate graduation payments $10,170 in inappropriate interim disbursements) from non-Federal funds for the incorrect escrow account disbursements.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1003-002-B
    $296
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Support or reimburse its program $296 from non-Federal funds for the unsupported escrow account disbursements.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1003-002-C
    $375
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Reimburse the appropriate households $375 from program funds for the underpaid escrow disbursements.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1003-002-D
    $2,547
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Support its general ledger and bank account balances or transfer $2,547 ($2,334 for the overfunded general ledger account $213 for the overfunded program bank account) from its Family Self-Sufficiency program account to its Housing Choice Voucher program account for the overfunded accounts cited in the finding.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1003-002-E

    Deposit the Family Self-Sufficiency program escrow funds into an interest-bearing account in accordance with HUD’s requirements.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1003-002-F

    Ensure that the program coordinator is trained on and familiar with HUD’s regulations.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1003-002-G

    Implement quality control procedures to ensure that (1) documentation required by HUD is correctly completed and maintained, (2) escrow account disbursements are appropriate and fully supported, (3) escrow account deposits are correctly calculated and recorded, and (4) the contracts of participation contain information that reflects participants’ current income and family rent amounts. The controls should include procedures for the review and approval of contract extensions and escrow account disbursements.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1003-002-H

    Evaluate its administration of the program to ensure it has the necessary capacity and resources to effectively manage the program.

Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-KC-0006-001-A

    Complete the rulemaking process for HUD’s single-family note sales program.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-KC-0006-001-B

    Develop and implement formal procedures and guidance for the note sales program.

2017-FW-0001 | Julio 10, 2017

HUD’s Monitoring of State CDBG

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-0001-001-A

    We recommend that the General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development develop and implement a quality review process at the headquarters level to ensure consistent compliance with its policy for risk analysis, to include but not be limited to reviewing supporting documentation for conclusions drawn.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-0001-001-B

    We recommend that the General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, develop and implement a policy requiring field offices to rate grantees of at least medium risk that have not been monitored in their respective program area within the last 3 years on factors that require assessments of capacity, program complexity, and monitoring findings resulting in repayment or grant reductions.