U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Exportar
Date Issued

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1005-001-H
    Closed on Agosto 18, 2020

    Implement additional procedures and controls to ensure that documentation is obtained to support that the limited clientele national objective was met.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1005-001-I
    Closed on Julio 15, 2024

    Obtain training or technical assistance on CDBG program requirements.

General Counsel

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-A
    Closed on Mayo 29, 2019
    $15,000
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Determine legal sufficiency and if legally sufficient, pursue civil and administrative remedies against Cypress Meadows, LLC; Skyline Crest Enterprises, LLC; the project’s owner; or all three for inappropriately disbursing funds in violation of the project’s regulatory agreement, operating lease agreement, and HUD requirements.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-B
    Closed on Septiembre 19, 2018

    Pursue appropriate civil money penalties and administrative actions, up to and including debarment, against Cypress Meadows LLC; Skyline Crest Enterprises LLC; the project’s owner; or all three for violating the project’s regulatory agreement, operating lease agreement, and HUD requirements.

Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-C
    Closed on Febrero 01, 2018
    $263,289
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Repay the project from non-project funds $263,289 for ineligible salary expenses.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-D
    Closed on Febrero 01, 2018
    $283,307
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Remove $283,307 in ineligible accrued salary fees payable from its financial statements and records and ensure that these expenses are not accrued or paid for with project funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-E
    Closed on Febrero 01, 2018
    $110,710
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Repay the project from non-project funds $110,710 for ineligible offsite accounting expenses.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-F
    Closed on Febrero 01, 2018
    $129,416
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Remove $129,416 in ineligible accrued offsite accounting fees payable from its financial statements and records and ensure that these expenses are not accrued or paid for with project funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-G
    Closed on Febrero 01, 2018
    $99,160
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Repay the project from non-project funds $99,160 for ineligible personal health insurance expenses of the owner.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-H
    Closed on Febrero 01, 2018
    $4,179
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Repay the project from non-project funds $4,179 for excessive bank fees.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-I
    Closed on Febrero 01, 2018
    $1,352
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Repay the project from non-project funds $1,352 for expenses related to the identity-of-interest hair salon.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-J
    Closed on Febrero 01, 2018

    Obtain approval from HUD for a lease agreement with the hair salon.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-K
    Closed on Febrero 01, 2018
    $65,232
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Provide documentation to support that $65,232 in disbursements was used on reasonable and necessary operating expenses or repay the project from non-project funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-L
    Closed on Febrero 01, 2018
    $620,937
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Pay the project $620,937 in uncollected rent from non-project funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-M
    Closed on Febrero 01, 2018
    $162,462
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Pay the project from non-project funds $162,462 in lease agreement charges not deposited into Cypress Meadows’ bank account.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-N
    Closed on Febrero 01, 2018

    Remove Skyline Crest Enterprises, LLC, as the operator and replace it with a HUD-approved independent operator.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-1004-001-O
    Closed on Febrero 01, 2018

    Develop and implement written policies and procedures for the management of the project, including but not limited to financial policies for cash disbursements, cash receipts, and documentation requirements.

Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-KC-0005-001-A
    Closed on Junio 22, 2023
    $3,144,894
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Create and implement policies and procedures or change program regulations to prevent multifamily housing properties from charging more for Section 8 units than for comparable non-Section 8 units. For the 25 properties reviewed, this measure would prevent as much as $3,144,894 of Section 8 funds from subsidizing non-Section 8 units in the next year.

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-AT-1006-002-A
    Closed on Marzo 11, 2019
    $542,289
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Deobligate $542,289 in fiscal year 2015 capital funds in HUD’s system until binding agreements are executed for eligible and reasonable purposes, or coordinate with HUD for terminating its funding.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-AT-1006-002-B
    Closed on Marzo 22, 2019
    $398,022
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Reclassify $398,022 in fiscal year 2016 capital funds as authorized in HUD’s system to an eligible and reasonable activity, or coordinate with HUD for terminating its funding.