U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Exportar
Date Issued

Office of the Secretary

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-0002-001-C

    Review the Clearance Calendar and ensure that appropriate form HUD-22 concurrence forms were obtained and documented for directives issued by other HUD offices.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-0002-001-D

    Implement controls to ensure that future directives are reviewed and documented in the Clearance Calendar tracking system as required.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-0002-001-E

    Update policies and procedures for the directives process, including responsibilities for process oversight and clear guidance defining when clearance is required.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-0002-001-F

    Develop and provide training to appropriate staff and required reviewing offices regarding the departmental clearance process requirements.

Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-0002-001-A

    Pursue departmental clearance for the 13 documents and policies identified that did not go through required departmental clearance. For any items that cannot be appropriately cleared, HUD should take appropriate action to recall the document or policy.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-LA-0002-001-B

    Obtain missing HUD-22 concurrence forms for the 13 identified directives and update the Clearance Calendar tracking system to properly document clearance of the 42 directives with incomplete Clearance Calendar documentation. For any items that cannot be appropriately cleared, HUD should take appropriate action to recall the document or policy.

Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-BO-1003-001-A
    $322,314
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Obtain repayment of $322,314 from nonproject funds from the management agent for the ineligible bookkeeper and accounts payable clerk’s salary and benefits, incurred during 2014 and 2015.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-BO-1003-001-B
    $139,027
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Decrease the payable to the management agent by $139,027 for ineligible employee services billed during 2014 and 2015, thereby reducing future expenditures because project funds will not be used for these ineligible expenses when funds become available.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-BO-1003-001-C
    $353,420
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Support or decrease the payables to its management agent for the amounts related to ineligible employee services charges before January 1, 2014, which we estimated to be $353,420.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-BO-1003-001-D

    Develop and implement controls over payments to include; ensuring that its management agreement clearly identifies services that are be provided by the management agent and paid for as part of the management fee, and the project is not charged for services that are part of the management fee.

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1001-001-A
    $1,432,222
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Support that $1,432,222 in central office cost center expenses allocated to the public housing program projects were eligible, necessary, and reasonable costs of the program. Costs that cannot be supported, or were unnecessary, unreasonable, or for ineligible program costs should be reimbursed to the program from non-Federal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1001-001-B

    Implement adequate procedures and controls, including but not limited to developing a plan to manage its central office cost center expenses and determining an appropriate fee structure with HUD’s approval that would allow it to operate its program within HUD’s requirements.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CH-1001-001-C

    Implement adequate procedures and controls, including but not limited to providing training to its staff to ensure that the Commission fully implements asset management and operates its program in accordance with HUD’s requirements.

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-KC-0002-001-A
    $935,283
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Require public housing agencies to run the Enterprise Income Verification existing tenant search during the admission process and retain the results in the tenant file, which would avoid unnecessary costs to HUD’s subsidy programs, allowing an estimated $935,283 to be put to better use.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-KC-0002-001-B

    Require public housing agencies to report the program admission date to any multifamily property listed on the Enterprise Income Verification existing tenant search during the admission process.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-KC-0002-001-C

    Require public housing agencies to maintain support for any communication with a multifamily property listed on the Enterprise Income Verification existing tenant search.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-KC-0002-001-D

    Require HUD staff to review Enterprise Income Verification reports from the last 12-month period during onsite housing agency reviews to ensure that any multiple subsidies have been resolved.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-KC-0002-001-E
    $2,244,680
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Implement recommendations 1A through 1D to ensure that $2.24 million in housing assistance funds will be put to better use.

General Counsel

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-CF-1801-001-A
    $3,129,000
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Acknowledge that $3,129,000 of the $5 million in the attached settlement agreement represents an amount due HUD.

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-NY-1005-001-A
    $3,536,974
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    We recommend that the Director of HUD’s Newark, NJ, Office of Community Planning and Development instruct County officials to reimburse $3,536,974 to the County’ HOME program line of credit for assistance spent on the four activities that were partially terminated or noncompliant with program requirements.