Develop a process to oversee housing discrimination allegations that FHAP agencies close and do not submit to HUD for dual-filing to ensure that the closure and jurisdictional determinations are consistent with the Fair Housing Act. To help address this recommendation, HUD should consider requiring FHAP agencies to enter data on closed inquiries in HEMS and make updates to FHAP agreements as necessary.

Perform a complete agency-wide fraud risk assessment (which incorporates the fraud risk assessments performed at the program level) and use the results to develop and implement an agency-wide plan to move HUD’s fraud risk management program out of the ad hoc phase.

Status

HUD continues to make progress in advancing HUD’s Fraud Risk Management program. HUD issued its Fraud Risk Policy on March 31, 2022. Since then, HUD has integrated fraud risk considerations into risk assessment work completed across HUD, to include processes for Front End Risk Assessments (FERA) and the annual risk profile refresh. Leveraging the history of reports issued by HUD oversight partners, HUD has (1) compiled program level oversight reports to identify fraud risk concerns; (2) initiated a repository to stratify elements of the reports to isolate fraud risk concerns; and (3) isolated trends and themes from the source reports. This baseline work will support the Department’s Fraud Risk Exposure report, due September 2024.

The Chief Risk Officer (CRO) has indicated that it is nearing completion on an entity wide fraud risk exposure analysis. This analysis will tell HUD what programs should be prioritized and reviewed regularly, and which programs can be reviewed less frequently. The programs ranked highest will be first on the list for a full fraud risk assessment and the CRO will lay out a plan and timeline for completing the others. The CRO is also working on a plan to transition from the use of contractor support to full time staff, the plan will occur in phases until 2027, with the first hiring actions occurring soon. The Office of Multifamily Housing (MFH) met with OIG on April 7 to demonstrate the progress they have made on their program-specific fraud risk assessment for the Project Based Rental Assistance Program. MFH expects to complete the assessment by July 15th. the Offices of Public and Indian Housing and Community and Planning and Development have not completed fraud risk assessments, but are working on assigning or hiring staff for dedicated risk management roles.

Analysis

While HUD has made considerable progress in the area of fraud risk management, there is still a lot of work to be done for HUD to complete an entity wide fraud risk assessment. While HUD's exposure analysis will help it to determine where to focus its efforts, HUD still needs to conduct program specific fraud risk assessments. Based on the demonstration by MFH, we believe that MFH has made great progress in its fraud risk assessment and we are encouraged that it has identified areas of weakness that it plans to target. However, PIH and CPD have not been able to demonstrate progress in this area and we do not believe that they will be able to complete program specific fraud risk assessments by 9/30/24.

To fully address this recommendation, HUD must provide evidence that it has performed an agency-wide fraud risk assessment performed at the program level, adopted and implemented its fraud risk assessment program departmental policy and that each HUD program office has established office-specific risk programs/p>

Develop and implement a procedure to collect and analyze reported suspected instances of fraud, along with other relevant data points, that can be leveraged to develop more robust antifraud risk mitigation tools.

Communicate to HUD program staff the differences between HUD’s enterprise risk management, PIIA, and financial risk management risk assessment processes to ensure an understanding of their roles and responsibilities within HUD’s fraud risk management program.

Develop and implement activities to raise awareness of fraud, such as participating in organized antifraud conferences or a newsletter that includes instances of recent fraud in Federal programs.

Develop and implement a strategy for collecting and analyzing agency-wide data, to include subrecipient and beneficiary data, to identify trends and potential indicators of fraud across programs.

Collaborate with the Chief Risk Officer to conduct a workforce assessment to determine the level of dedicated full-time staff resources needed by the Chief Risk Officer to effectively (1) administer HUD’s enterprise and fraud risk management programs and (2) support program risk officers by increasing employee and stakeholder awareness of potential fraud schemes that could impact each program respectively.

If the workforce assessment determines that additional staff are needed, work with the Chief Risk Officer to staff the necessary positions.

Implement written procedures to ensure consistency among field offices in reviewing spending issues, potentially preventing up to an estimated $47 million in annual CoC recaptures.

Design and implement a training program and other development tools to help grantees. The goal of such training would be to provide ideas and other development tools to help the CoCs better provide assistance with implementation of their grants and monitoring of their grantees, including assistance with developing outreach strategies, partnering with community providers, financial budgeting, and best practices. The training should focus on the needs of first-year grantees and CPD should take steps to encourage participation.

Consider conducting an analysis of staffing resources needed to manage the REO and notes sales on tribal trust properties program and adjust staffing accordingly.

In conjunction with corrective actions being taken on previous audits, revise ONAP’s internal policy and procedures to include detailed written policies and procedures for the marketing, preservation, and sale of defaulted loan notes and REO properties on tribal trust and other restricted lands.

Work with the Office of the Chief Information Officer to develop an electronic solution, such as a new module in Native Advantage or one similar to FHA’s P260 tracking system, to track the sale of defaulted loan notes and REO properties on tribal trust and other restricted lands. While the solution is being developed, HUD should put controls into place to ensure that manual systems used to track defaulted loans and REO properties are complete and accurate.

We recommend that the General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing require the Real Estate Assessment Center in coordination with the Office of Field Operations to develop and implement a plan to manage lead-based paint and lead-based paint hazards in public housing.

Requires the REAC in coordination with OFO to determine the number of developments and associated units that contain lead-based paint and lead-based paint hazards.

Status

The Real Estate Assessment Center and Office of Field Operations will collaborate with the Office of Lead Hazard Control and Healthy Homes, the Office of Policy Development and Research, and a statistician to evaluate data collected under the NSPIRE inspection program to estimate the number of public housing developments and associated units that contain lead-based paint and lead-based paint hazards. The final action target date is March 31, 2025.

Analysis

To address this recommendation, HUD will need to provide evidence that it collected and evaluated data under NSPIRE and estimated the number of public housing developments and associated units that contain lead-based paint and lead-based paint hazards.

Implementation of this recommendation will assist HUD in working with PHAs to address the public housing units that contain lead-based paint and lead-based paint hazards and help HUD’s oversight of units in need of hazard reduction.

We recommend that the General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing require the Real Estate Assessment Center in coordination with the Office of Field Operations to determine the cost to eliminate or control the lead-based paint and lead based paint hazards in public housing and the timeframe to complete such work based on the existing funding levels and strategies that could accelerate the timeframe.

We recommend that the General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing require the Real Estate Assessment Center in coordination with the Office of Field Operations to implement adequate procedures and controls to ensure that public housing agencies appropriately identify and control lead-based paint and eliminate lead-based paint hazards in public housing.

We recommend that the General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing require the Real Estate Assessment Center in coordination with the Office of Field Operations to determine whether the public housing agencies identified as having lead-based paint hazards in their housing developments maintain and implement a plan for managing lead-based paint. For any public housing agency that does not have a plan for the management of lead-based paint in its public housing developments, as appropriate, HUD should inform the public housing agency that it should develop and implement its own plan.

We recommend that the General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing require the Real Estate Assessment Center in coordination with the Office of Field Operations to assess the lead-based paint hazard reduction activities performed at the 19 developments associated with 18 public housing agencies reviewed that did not implement interim controls and ongoing maintenance and reevaluation activities or adequately document that previously identified lead-based paint had been abated or treated with interim controls and subjected to ongoing maintenance and reevaluation activities. If those reduction activities did not fully abate the lead-based paint, HUD should ensure that the public housing agencies implement interim controls and ongoing maintenance and reevaluation programs and maintain required documentation.

Update applicable requirements to require assisted property owners, including PHAs, to maintain adequate documentation to support their determinations that maintenance and hazard reduction activities that disturb surfaces with lead-based paint qualify for the de minimis exemption from the lead-safe work practices under the Lead Safe Housing Rule.

Status

The Office of Lead Hazard Control and Healthy Homes has drafted guidance on the de minimis exception to the Lead Safe Housing Rule for the Office of Public and Indian Housing, the Office of Multifamily Housing, and the Office of Community Planning and Development.

The Office of Lead Hazard Control and Healthy Homes expects to issue the guidance in final by July 2024.

Analysis

To implement this recommendation, HUD needs to provide evidence that it has prepared and issued a notice to target housing owners and public housing agencies on the de minimis exception and conducted trainings/webinars on requirements and best practices pertaining to de minimis.

Implementation of this recommendation and associated corrective actions will ensure assisted property owners are sufficiently informed regarding the requirements to support their determinations that maintenance and hazard reduction activities that disturb surfaces with lead-based paint qualify for the de minimis exemption from the lead safe work practices under the Lead Safe Housing Rule and that assisted property owners are conducting this work safely, thereby ensuring households are residing in safe and healthy HUD assisted housing.