U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Exportar
Date Issued

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1002-001-G

    Develop and implement adequate policies and procedures to address the environmental deficiencies identified.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1002-001-H

    Strengthen their policies and procedures to address the procurement and contract administration deficiencies identified.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1002-001-I

    Strengthen their procedures to obligate capital funds in a timely manner.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1002-001-J

    Provide technical assistance to Authority officials to ensure that responsible staff receives necessary procurement and environmental review training.

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1001-001-A
    $422,768
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Repay from non-Federal funds the $422,768 in ineligible funds related to the City’s failure to meet HOME CHDO commitment deadlines and complete activities in accordance with the HOME agreement and HOME regulations.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1001-001-B
    $3,136,798
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Support that $3,136,798 in HOME funds disbursed was reasonable and supported in accordance with Federal requirements or repay from non-Federal funds any amount that cannot be supported.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1001-001-C
    $130,667
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Support that the City properly administered the HOME program and earned $130,667 in HOME administrative fees or repay from non-Federal funds any amount that cannot be supported

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1001-001-D
    $487,483
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Reallocate the $487,483 in unspent funds to ensure that they will be put to their intended use or, if the activities remain open, maintain support to show that the HOME funds disbursed were reasonable and Reallocate the $487,483 in unspent funds to ensure that they will be put to their intended use or, if the activities remain open, maintain support to show that the HOME funds disbursed were reasonable and supported in accordance with Federal requirements.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1001-001-E
    $254,215
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Identify, review, and approve a CHDO to work with the City to ensure that $254,215 in CHDO funds will be properly committed to avoid being deobligated.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1001-001-F

    Establish underwriting policies and procedures to ensure that HOME activities are consistent and meet Federal requirements.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1001-001-G

    Develop and implement adequate environmental policies and procedures to ensure that environmental reviews are properly documented and supported and that HUD and Federal environmental requirements have been followed before committing HOME funds to an activity.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1001-001-H

    Develop and implement adequate policies and procedures to ensure that fixed HOME units are identified and adequate documentation is maintained to support tenant eligibility and compliance with HOME rental limits for the entire affordability period.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1001-001-I

    Develop and implement tools to improve record-keeping practices to support the eligibility, necessity, and reasonableness of the HOME activities.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-BO-1001-001-J

    Provide technical assistance to the City to ensure that responsible staff receives necessary environmental, underwriting, and overall program administration training.

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-FW-1001-001-A

    We recommend that the Little Rock Acting PIH Director require the Authority to develop and implement an achievable plan to close the remaining projects and complete its RAD program conversions.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-FW-1001-001-B
    $1,925,814
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    We recommend that the Little Rock Acting PIH Director require the Authority to support or repay $1,925,814 in predevelopment costs to its program from nonfederal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-FW-1001-001-C
    $829,544
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    We recommend that the Little Rock Acting PIH Director require the Authority to design and implement financial controls to ensure that $829,544 in remaining predevelopment costs is properly accounted for and supported.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-FW-1001-001-D

    We recommend that the Little Rock Acting PIH Director require the Authority to develop and implement procedures to identify, report, and resolve conflict-of-interest and ethics concerns.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-FW-1001-001-E

    We recommend that the Little Rock Acting PIH Director require the Authority to design and implement adequate control systems to ensure that the executive management team provides oversight of its RAD program.

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2019-LA-1004-001-A
    $21,052
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Provide supporting documentation for the participant’s eligibility (tenant code t0019221) or repay its program $13,885 from non-Federal funds for the housing assistance payments and any subsequent payments made.