Develop and implement a process to inventory all agency PII holdings not less than annually.
2018-OE-0001 | Septiembre 13, 2018
HUD Privacy Program Evaluation Report
Office of Administration
- Status2018-OE-0001-21OpenClosed
- Status2018-OE-0001-22OpenClosed
Renew the PII minimization effort, to include a prioritization by the SAOP of specific minimization initiatives
- Status2018-OE-0001-23OpenClosed
Require all system owners to review the records retention practices for each information system and take any corrective actions necessary to ensure adherence to the applicable records retention schedule
- Status2018-OE-0001-24OpenClosed
A. Issue a clean desk policy prohibiting unattended and unsecured sensitive data in workplaces. B. Implement procedures to enforce the clean desk policy.
2018-PH-0002 | Septiembre 10, 2018
HUD Did Not Provide Adequate Oversight of Its Family Self-Sufficiency Program
Public and Indian Housing
- Status2018-PH-0002-001-AOpenClosed$7,779,450Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Require the 12 grantees to correct their action plans to ensure that they comply with program requirements and submit the corrected plans to HUD for review or require the grantees to repay HUD from non-Federal funds for any amount of the $7,779,450 they received that they cannot support.
- Status2018-PH-0002-001-BOpenClosed$1,520Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Require the Housing Authority of Brevard County to repay $1,520 in ineligible escrow funds to HUD from non-Federal funds for the program participant that exceeded allowable contract terms of the FSS program.
- Status2018-PH-0002-001-COpenClosed
Monitor the grantees’ efforts to improve the accuracy and completeness of the PIC program data to ensure that program outcomes reported to Congress are accurately supported.
- Status2018-PH-0002-001-DOpenClosed
Develop and implement a plan to monitor grantee FSS programs, including to ensure that escrow accounts are calculated correctly.
- Status2018-PH-0002-001-EOpenClosed
Develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure that documentation is maintained by grantees to support program participants’ contractual agreements.
2018-DE-1001 | Septiembre 06, 2018
Meeker Housing Authority, Meeker, CO, Improperly Used Project Operating Funds for Its 221(d)(3) Multifamily Housing Insurance Program
Housing
- Status2018-DE-1001-001-AOpenClosed
Put all project bank accounts in the name of the project.
- Status2018-DE-1001-001-BOpenClosed
Separate all owner bank accounts from the project’s bank accounts.
- Status2018-DE-1001-001-COpenClosed
Develop and implement controls over the distinction between project funds and owner funds. These controls should include policies related to when the owner is allowed to take project funds owed to the owner.
- Status2018-DE-1001-001-DOpenClosed
Take HUD-approved training related to operating and maintaining a multifamily project.
- Status2018-DE-1001-002-AOpenClosed$142,805Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Repay the project’s operating account from nonproject funds for the $142,805 spent on ineligible expenses.
- Status2018-DE-1001-002-BOpenClosed$12,355Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Provide support for the $12,355 in project funds spent to pay individuals who were not on the payroll and for services provided for project operations. For any portion of this amount that is not supported, the owner should repay the project operating account using nonproject funds.
- Status2018-DE-1001-002-COpenClosed
Obtain training on the eligible use of project funds.
- Status2018-DE-1001-002-DOpenClosed
Develop and implement detailed policies and procedures for procurement, travel, and the use of its credit cards. These controls should comply with HUD regulations regarding procurement and other disbursement documentation requirements.
- Status2018-DE-1001-003-AOpenClosed
Submit any outstanding audited financial statements.
- Status2018-DE-1001-003-BOpenClosed
Review the audited financial statements and determine the amount of outstanding mortgage payments due.
- Status2018-DE-1001-003-COpenClosed
Work with the local multifamily office to make any outstanding mortgage payments or devise a plan to bring the property current through the use of available funds.