U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Exportar
Date Issued

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-LA-1006-001-F

    Provide procurement training to its staff members who work on CDBG program activities and ensure that staff members comply with HUD requirements and use its current procurement policy.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-LA-1006-001-G
    $55,200
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Support that the entrepreneur center feasibility study met a final cost objective or repay its program $55,200 from non-Federal funds.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-LA-1006-001-H
    $283
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Reimburse its program $283 from non-Federal funds for unallowable bottled water costs.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-LA-1006-001-I
    $141
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Review all invoices provided from its minor repair subrecipient between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017, and repay the program from non-Federal funds for all bottled water service payments not identified in this audit report.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-LA-1006-001-J

    Provide training to its employees regarding allowable costs to ensure that all costs submitted by contractors and subrecipients are eligible for reimbursement.

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-OE-0014-01

    Create agreements and strategies with other program offices that describe when cross-programmatic reviews and enforcement actions against PHAs are required.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-OE-0014-02

    Train PIH officials on the authority and processes for declaring PHAs in substantial default and for taking PHAs into HUD possession.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-OE-0014-03

    Update and strengthen the training program for HUD receivers of PHAs.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-OE-0014-04

    Update procedures for receiverships to include specific guidance on when initiating a receivership may be appropriate.

Community Planning and Development

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-FW-0002-001-A

    We recommend that the Acting Director of OBGA work with HUD’s Office of General Counsel to create a codified Disaster Recovery program.

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-AT-1009-001-A
    $1,188
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    The Pell City Housing Authority to reimburse its public housing fund from non-Federal funds $1,188 for payments made for ineligible credit card expenditures.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-AT-1009-001-B
    $12,874
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    The Pell City Housing Authority to support or reimburse its public housing fund $12,874 ($4,709 $8,165) for unsupported disbursements.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-AT-1009-001-C

    The Pell City Housing Authority to fully implement adequate internal controls over its credit card purchases and disbursements to ensure that it complies with Federal requirements and its own policies and procedures.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-AT-1009-001-D

    The Pell City Housing Authority to revise its policies and procedures for its review of expenditures to ensure that its board of commissioners documents its enforcement of and the Authority’s compliance with the requirements during its review process to ensure that the Authority’s disbursements are supported and used for eligible expenditures.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-AT-1009-001-E

    The Pell City Housing Authority’s board of commissioners to receive training to ensure the proper review and approval of expenditures and to understand the requirements relevant to the Authority’s financial operations.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-AT-1009-001-F
    $105
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    The Ragland Housing Authority to reimburse its public housing fund from non-Federal funds $105 for credit card payments made for ineligible expenditures.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-AT-1009-001-G
    $31,580
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    The Ragland Housing Authority to support or reimburse its public housing fund $31,580 ($1,320 $11,887 $18,373) for unsupported disbursements.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-AT-1009-001-H

    The Ragland Housing Authority to develop and implement adequate internal controls over its credit card purchases and disbursements to ensure that it complies with Federal requirements and its own policies and procedures.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-AT-1009-001-I

    The Ragland Housing Authority to develop and implement its own policies and procedures for its review of expenditures to ensure that its board of commissioners documents its enforcement of and the Authority’s compliance with the requirements during its review process to ensure that the Authority’s disbursements are supported and used for eligible expenditures.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-AT-1009-001-J

    The Ragland Housing Authority’s board of commissioners to receive training to ensure the proper review and approval of expenditures and to understand the requirements relevant to the Authority’s financial operations.