The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.
2018-DP-0003 | Marzo 08, 2018
Fiscal Year 2017 Review of Information Systems Controls in Support of the Financial Statements Audit
Chief Information Officer
- Status2018-DP-0003-006-FOpenClosedClosed on Junio 07, 2018SensitiveSensitive
Sensitive information refers to information that could have a damaging import if released to the public and, therefore, must be restricted from public disclosure.
2018-KC-1001 | Marzo 04, 2018
CitiMortgage, Inc., O’Fallon, MO, Improperly Filed for FHA-HAMP Partial Claims Before Completing the Loan Modifications and Reinstating the Loans
Housing
- Status2018-KC-1001-001-AOpenClosedClosed on Noviembre 21, 2019$1,053,688Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Repay HUD for improperly filed partial claims and incentive fees totaling $1,053,688.
- Status2018-KC-1001-001-BOpenClosedClosed on Abril 15, 2020
Work with HUD to ensure the release of the liens on the 66 properties with improper partial claims.
- Status2018-KC-1001-001-COpenClosedClosed on Julio 17, 2019
Perform an internal review of all FHA-HAMP partial claims that were combined with loan modifications to determine their eligibility and report the results to HUD for repayment of improperly filed partial claims.
2018-LA-1002 | Febrero 22, 2018
The County of San Diego, San Diego, CA, Did Not Support Continuum of Care Match and Payroll Costs in Accordance With Requirements
Community Planning and Development
- Status2018-LA-1002-001-AOpenClosedClosed on Marzo 29, 2024$54,473Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Support the unsupported amount of match for its subgrantee or repay HUD $54,473 from non-Federal funds (appendix D).
- Status2018-LA-1002-001-BOpenClosed
Implement written procedures to include the confirmation of match funds as part of its annual monitoring reviews of each subgrantee.
- Status2018-LA-1002-001-COpenClosed
Develop and implement a written plan for its subgrantees to provide and submit supporting documentation for match funds at the end of each grant term.
- Status2018-LA-1002-002-AOpenClosedClosed on Marzo 29, 2024$12,109Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Support sampled retroactive payroll costs totaling $12,109, which correspond to the actual time attributed to grants CA0689L9D011502, CA0880L9D011501, CA0881L9D011501, and CA0945L9D011506, or reimburse HUD from non-Federal funds.
- Status2018-LA-1002-002-BOpenClosed
Identify retroactive payroll for remaining grants (CA1162L9D011504, CA1024L9D011501, CA0694L9D011508, and CA0693L9D011508) and provide adequate documentation to support the cost or repay HUD from non-Federal funds.
- Status2018-LA-1002-002-COpenClosed
Develop and implement additional procedures and controls to ensure that payroll costs charged to the grant reconcile to actual hours worked on the grants.
2018-PH-1002 | Febrero 15, 2018
The Fairmont-Morgantown Housing Authority, Fairmont, WV, Did Not Always Ensure That Its Program Units Met Housing Quality Standards and That It Accurately Calculated Housing Assistance Payment Abatements
Public and Indian Housing
- Status2018-PH-1002-001-AOpenClosedClosed on Diciembre 04, 2018
Certify, along with the owners of the 63 units cited in this finding, that the applicable housing quality standards violations have been corrected.
- Status2018-PH-1002-001-BOpenClosedClosed on Septiembre 14, 2021$29,226Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Reimburse its program $29,226 from non-Federal funds ($27,737 for housing assistance payments and $1,489 in associated administrative fees) for the 22 units that materially failed to meet HUD’s housing quality standards.
- Status2018-PH-1002-001-COpenClosedClosed on Diciembre 04, 2018$1,241,550Funds Put to Better Use
Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.
Develop and implement procedures and controls to ensure that program units meet housing quality standards and inspectors are adequately trained to perform inspections, thereby ensuring that an estimated $1,241,550 in program funds is spent for units that are decent, safe and sanitary.
- Status2018-PH-1002-001-DOpenClosedClosed on Septiembre 30, 2019$3,822Questioned Costs
Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Reimburse its program $3,822 from non-Federal funds for housing assistance payments that should have been abated.
- Status2018-PH-1002-001-EOpenClosedClosed on Agosto 15, 2018$267Funds Put to Better Use
Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.
Reimburse five owners $267 for the excess housing assistance payments it abated.
- Status2018-PH-1002-001-FOpenClosedClosed on Diciembre 04, 2018
Develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure that extensions granted to owners to make repairs after failed inspections comply with HUD regulations.
- Status2018-PH-1002-001-GOpenClosedClosed on Agosto 21, 2018
Develop and implement controls to ensure that abatements are properly calculated and procedures in its administrative plan are followed.
- Status2018-PH-1002-001-HOpenClosedClosed on Agosto 30, 2018
Train its staff on the proper abatement of housing assistance payments.
2018-DP-0002 | Febrero 12, 2018
Review of Information Systems Controls Over FHA
Housing
- Status2018-DP-0002-001-AOpenClosedClosed on Junio 01, 2018SensitiveSensitive
Sensitive information refers to information that could have a damaging import if released to the public and, therefore, must be restricted from public disclosure.
The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.
- Status2018-DP-0002-001-BOpenClosedClosed on Septiembre 26, 2018SensitiveSensitive
Sensitive information refers to information that could have a damaging import if released to the public and, therefore, must be restricted from public disclosure.
The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.