U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Document

We audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) oversight of safe water requirements for Federal Housing Administration (FHA)-insured loans nationwide.  We conducted the audit based on news reports that identified lead contamination in public water systems across the country and also because of an audit in which we found that HUD did not have adequate controls to ensure that FHA-insured properties located in Flint, MI, had safe water.   Our audit objective was to determine whether HUD provided sufficient guidance and oversight to ensure that properties approved for mortgage insurance had a continuing and sufficient supply of safe and potable water.

HUD did not provide sufficient guidance and oversight to ensure that properties approved for mortgage insurance had a continuing and sufficient supply of safe and potable water.  Of 49 loan files reviewed, from a universe of 1,432 properties connected to a public water supply for which a notice that it had lead contamination was issued to the public, none disclosed the contamination or contained evidence of water testing.  This condition occurred because HUD maintained that its existing policies and guidance sufficiently ensured that FHA-insured properties had a continuing and sufficient supply of safe and potable water.  HUD also lacked controls to determine whether appraisers notified lenders of properties in areas serviced by a public water system with unacceptable levels of contaminants.  As a result, HUD could be endorsing loans for properties with contaminants that affect families’ health.  Further, if property values decrease due to the water quality issues, both HUD and the homeowner face an increased risk of loss. 

We recommend that HUD direct the applicable lenders to provide evidence that the properties for 1,383 FHA-insured loans had a safe and potable water source, or that the appraisers had not notified them of the water quality issue on their appraisals.  If they cannot provide this evidence, direct them to perform water testing and any necessary remediation, or indemnify HUD against future loss.  We also recommend that HUD improve its guidance and implement policies and procedures to ensure compliance, thereby putting at least $238.1 million to better use.

Recommendations

Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-PH-0003-001-A
    Closed on Agosto 26, 2019

    Direct the applicable lenders to provide evidence that the properties for the 1,383 FHA-insured loans not included in our sample had a safe and potable water source, or that the appraisers had not notified the lender of the water quality issue on their appraisals. If the lenders cannot provide this evidence, HUD should direct them to perform water testing and any necessary remediation to ensure that the properties have a safe and potable water source, or indemnify HUD against future loss.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-PH-0003-001-B
    Closed on Agosto 26, 2019

    Take appropriate administrative action against the lenders or appraisers for any cases in which it finds that they did not take appropriate steps to ensure that properties had a safe and potable water source.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-PH-0003-001-C
    Closed on Agosto 05, 2019

    Develop and implement additional guidance to advise lenders and appraisers when water testing is required for properties serviced by a public water system which has issued a public notice of water contamination.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-PH-0003-001-D
    $238,090,214.00
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Closed on Agosto 05, 2019

    Develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure that appraisers comply with guidance implemented to resolve recommendation 1C, including penalties for failure to comply, thereby ensuring that at least $238,090,214 million is put to better use.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-PH-0003-001-E
    Closed on Diciembre 30, 2019

    Consider requiring water testing for all FHA-insured properties.