Final Civil Action – Primary Residential Mortgage, Inc. Settled Allegations of Failing To Comply With HUD’s Federal Housing Administration Loan Requirements
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Inspector General (OIG), assisted the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Colorado, in the civil investigation of Primary Residential Mortgage, Inc. Primary has its principal place of business in Salt Lake City, UT. Primary became an FHA-approved direct endorsement lender on October 15, 1998. The direct...
Enero 18, 2017
Memorandum
#2017-CF-1801
The Houston Housing Authority, Houston, TX, Needs To Improve Its Procurement and Financial Operations and Its Housing Choice Voucher Program Subsidy Determinations
The Houston Housing Authority, Houston, TX, Needs To Improve Its Procurement and Financial Operations and Its Housing Choice Voucher Program Subsidy Determinations
We audited the Houston Housing Authority’s public housing and Housing Choice Voucher programs. We selected the Authority for review in accordance with our audit plan and based upon risk analyses. Our objectives were to determine whether the Authority (1) followed U.S....
Diciembre 26, 2016
Report
#2017-FW-1003
Fort Worth Housing Solutions, Fort Worth, TX, Generally Complied With HUD Regulations In Its Transactions With Its Related Entity, QuadCo Management Solutions, LLC
Based on the results of a prior audit, we reviewed Fort Worth Housing Solutions (FWHS) and transactions with its related entity QuadCo Management Solutions, LLC (QuadCo) of Fort Worth, TX. Our objectives were to determine whether FWHS (1) properly managed its U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funds, specifically whether it improperly loaned $1.6 million in HUD funds to QuadCo; (2) paid management fees within HUD’s...
Diciembre 20, 2016
Report
#2017-FW-1002
Majestic Management, LLC, a Multifamily Housing Management Agent in St. Louis, MO, Did Not Always Comply With HUD’s Requirements When Disbursing Project Funds
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Inspector General audited Majestic Management, LLC, located in St. Louis, MO. Our objective was to determine whether Majestic Management charged only the appropriate fees in managing the projects, properly procured goods and services, and disbursed project funds only for eligible and supported expenses.
Majestic Management improperly charged fees to its projects, did not...
Diciembre 15, 2016
Report
#2017-KC-1001
The Town of Amherst, NY, Did Not Ensure That Its Housing Choice Voucher Program Units Met Housing Quality Standards (REISSUED February 17, 2017)
(REISSUED February 17, 2017)
We audited the Town of Amherst’s Housing Choice Voucher program administered through a contractor, Belmont Housing Resources for Western New York, to address our audit plan priority to ensure that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) public and Indian housing programs are sufficiently administered by public housing agencies (PHA). We selected this auditee based on a risk analysis of...
Diciembre 13, 2016
Report
#2017-NY-1003
The Lubbock Housing Authority, Lubbock, TX, Had Weaknesses in Managing Its Capital Fund Program Operations
We audited the Lubbock Housing Authority’s Public Housing Capital Fund program as part of our regional audit plan. Our objective was to determine whether the Authority properly implemented its U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Capital Fund program.
The Authority generally implemented its Capital Fund program in compliance with HUD requirements and undertook work consistent with its annual and 5-year plans. ...
Diciembre 11, 2016
Report
#2017-FW-1001
The Tarrytown Municipal Housing Authority, Did Not Always Comply With HUD’s Procurement, Administrative, and Program Requirements
We audited the Tarrytown Municipal Housing Authority’s administration of its public housing program based on an Office of Inspector General risk assessment. The objectives of the audit were to evaluate the Authority’s financial controls to determine whether (1) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funds were used for eligible, reasonable, and supported expenses and (2) adequate financial controls were maintained to...
Noviembre 21, 2016
Report
#2017-NY-1002
Fiscal Years 2016 and 2015 (Restated) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Consolidated Financial Statements Audit
This page previously contained our independent auditor’s report on HUD’s fiscal year 2016 and 2015 (Restated) consolidated financial statements (OIG Audit Report 2017-FO-0004), issued November 15, 2016. In the report, one basis for our disclaimer of opinion was that HUD was unable to provide final consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in a timeframe that would allow us to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to...
Noviembre 17, 2016
Report
#2017-FO-0004
Audit of FHA’s Fiscal Years 2016 and 2015 (Restated) Financial Statements
(Reissued on 7/7/17)
This report was reissued on July 7, 2017, to correct Appendix A. This reissued report now correctly shows the monetary benefit associated with each recommendation.
This report presents the results of our audit of FHA’s fiscal years 2016 and 2015 (restated) financial statements, including our report on FHA’s internal control and test of compliance with selected provisions of laws and regulations applicable to FHA.
In...
Noviembre 13, 2016
Report
#2017-FO-0002
HUD Did Not Ensure Compliance With Partial Payment of Claim Use Agreement Restrictions
We audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Multifamily Housing Programs’ implementation of use agreement restrictions for affordable set-aside units because it was included in our audit plan based on a prior audit, which determined that a multifamily project owner did not comply with project use agreement restrictions. The objective of the audit was to determine whether HUD ensured compliance with use...
Octubre 27, 2016
Report
#2017-LA-0001
HUD Needs to Improve its Oversight of Funds Covered Under the Low-Income Housing Preservation and Resident Homeownership Act of 1990
We audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) oversight of funds covered under the Low-Income Housing Preservation and Resident Homeownership Act of 1990 in HUD’s Line of Credit Control System1 based on information obtained during our audit of Carmen-Marine Apartments (2015-CH-1010). The audit was part of the activities in our fiscal year 2016 annual audit plan. Our objective was to determine whether...
Octubre 25, 2016
Report
#2017-CH-0001
FHA Paid Claims for an Estimated 239,000 Properties That Servicers Did Not Foreclose Upon or Convey on Time
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Inspector General audited HUD to determine whether it paid servicers’ claims for properties that did not foreclose or convey on time. We initiated this audit due to concerns that HUD overpaid servicers’ claims for FHA insurance benefits.
HUD paid claims for an estimated 239,000 properties that servicers did not foreclose upon or convey on time. HUD paid an...
Octubre 14, 2016
Report
#2017-KC-0001
Sons of Divine Providence Did Not Ensure That the Don Orione Home, East Boston, MA, Operated in Accordance With Its Regulatory Agreement
Sons of Divine Providence did not properly oversee the HUD-insured nursing home to ensure that it operated in accordance with its regulatory agreement. By not informing HUD of the lawsuits, the changes in management agents, and the loans, Sons of Divine Providence did not provide HUD the necessary data to understand the risk to the HUD insurance fund. However, when Sons of Divine Providence sold the nursing home and paid off the HUD...
Octubre 13, 2016
Memorandum
#2017-BO-1801
Final Civil Action - Owner and Management Agents Settled Allegations of Failing To Comply With the Regulatory Agreements for Multifamily Projects Willow Run I and Willow Run II
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Inspector General (OIG), assisted the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Minnesota in a civil investigation of Willow Run Partners L.P. and Willow Run II Partners L.P. Willow Run Partners L.P. was the owner of Willow Run I Apartments, and Willow Run II Partners L.P. was the owner of Willow Run II Apartments. Our investigation began as a result of a...
Septiembre 30, 2016
Memorandum
#2016-CF-1813
The Dayton Metropolitan Housing Authority, Dayton, OH, Did Not Always Follow HUD’s and Its Own Requirements for the Procurement of Capital Grant-Funded Contract
We audited the Dayton Metropolitan Housing Authority’s Public Housing Capital Fund program. We selected the Authority’s program for audit based on our analysis of risk factors related to public housing agencies in Region 5’s1 jurisdiction. The audit was part of the activities in our fiscal year 2016 annual audit plan. Our objective was to determine whether the Authority complied with the U.S. Department of Housing and...
Septiembre 30, 2016
Report
#2016-CH-1012
The Condominium Association and Management Agent Lacked Adequate Controls Over the Operation of West Park Place Condominium, Chicago, IL
We audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) resident home-ownership program grant for West Park Place Condominium (project) based on the results of a risk assessment of multifamily housing programs in Region 5’s jurisdiction (States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin) and the activities in our fiscal year 2016 annual audit plan. Our objective was to determine whether the West Park...
Septiembre 30, 2016
Report
#2016-CH-1009
The Owner and Former Management Agent for Baldwin Creek Apartments, Fort Wayne, IN, Did Not Always Operate the Project in Accordance With HUD’s Requirements and the Regulatory Agreement
We audited Baldwin Creek Apartments as part of the activities in our fiscal year 2016 annual audit plan. We selected the project based on our analysis of risk factors related to multifamily projects in Region 5’s jurisdiction1. Our objective was to determine whether the project’s owner and management agents operated the project in accordance with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) requirements and the...
Septiembre 30, 2016
Report
#2016-CH-1010
The Broward County Housing Authority, Lauderdale Lakes, FL, Did Not Always Comply With HUD’s and Its Own Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program Requirements
We audited the Broward County Housing Authority’s Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program as part of the activities in our fiscal year 2016 annual audit plan. Our objective was to determine whether the Authority administered its program in accordance with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) and its own requirements.
The Authority did not always comply with HUD’s requirements and its own administrative policies...
Septiembre 30, 2016
Report
#2016-AT-1014
The Kentucky Housing Corporation Did Not Always Accurately Report on FHA-Insured Loans to HUD
We audited the Kentucky Housing Corporation’s administration of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Loss Mitigation program for loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). We selected the Corporation based on our analysis of risk factors of single-family loan servicers in Region 4’s jurisdiction. Our audit objective was to determine whether the Corporation accurately reported the default...
Septiembre 30, 2016
Report
#2016-AT-1015
Mortgage Services III, LLC, Bloomington, IL, Generally Complied With HUD’s Underwriting and Quality Control Requirements
We audited Mortgage Services III, LLC, a Federal Housing Administration (FHA)-approved direct endorsement lender, as part of the activities in our fiscal year 2016 annual audit plan. We selected Mortgage Services for review based on an analysis of data in the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Single Family Data Warehouse system for single-family lenders with home offices in Region 5’s jurisdiction. ...
Septiembre 30, 2016
Report
#2016-CH-1011