The Adams County, Colorado, Did Not Comply with HOME Investment Partnerships Program Regulations
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Inspector General, audited Adams County, Colorado's HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) to determine whether Adams County appropriately spent and accounted for HOME funds and maintained supporting documentation for its matching contributions reported to HUD.
Adams County inappropriately spent or could not support more than $2.1 million in HOME funds. Specifically...
Febrero 10, 2009
Report
#2009-DE-1001
The City of Durham, North Carolina, Did Not Comply with All Federal Procurement Requirements
We audited the City of Durham (City), North Carolina's HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) program. Our audit objective was to determine whether the City complied with applicable federal procurement requirements with respect to its homeowner rehabilitation activity. This is the second of two audits of the City's program.
The City did not advertise for homeowner rehabilitation contractors as required. Also, it did not take necessary...
Septiembre 24, 2008
Report
#2008-AT-1015
The State of Colorado Did Not Comply with Community Development Block Grant Program Requirements
We audited the State of Colorado (State), Division of Housing's (Division) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program to determine whether the Division (1) awarded CDBG funds to ineligible projects and (2) properly identified and reported program income data.
The Division used CDBG funds for ineligible and questionable projects. This condition occurred because management's main focus was on selecting projects that were for the...
Septiembre 23, 2008
Report
#2008-DE-1003
The City of Durham, North Carolina Did Not Comply with HOME Investment Partnerships Requirements
We audited the City of Durham (City), North Carolina 's HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) program as part of our annual audit plan. Our audit objectives were to determine whether the City complied with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements for monitoring HOME subrecipients and recording and using HOME program income.
The City did not always perform required monitoring reviews or provide adequate evidence that...
Agosto 07, 2008
Report
#2008-AT-1011
The Housing Authority of the City of Brighton, Colorado, Did Not Maintain Proper Inventory Records and Improperly Awarded Contracts
We audited the Housing Authority of the City of Brighton, Colorado (Authority) in response to a complaint alleging that it did not have an inventory control system and that it used poor procurement practices.
Our audit objectives were to determine whether the Authority had an adequate inventory control system and whether it performed contracting activities in accordance with federal procurement requirements.
The Authority did not have complete...
Marzo 18, 2008
Report
#2008-DE-1002
The Housing Authority of the City of Colorado Springs, Colorado, Improperly Managed Contracts and Improperly Maintained Its Section 8 Waiting List
HUD-OIG audited the Housing Authority of the City of Colorado Springs, Colorado in response to an anonymous complaint alleging that it improperly awarded all contracts for rehabilitation services to the same bidder, did not properly maintain its waiting list, and inappropriately awarded new Section 8 housing choice vouchers.
Our audit objectives were to determine whether the Authority followed federal procurement requirements and its own...
Noviembre 26, 2007
Report
#2008-DE-1001
The Wilmington Housing Authority, Wilmington, North Carolina, Did Not Follow HUD Requirements for Its Nonprofit Development Activities
Septiembre 26, 2007
Report
#2007-AT-1011
Rocky Mountain Mutual Housing Association, Denver, Colorado, Paid Ineligible Owner Expenses
Abril 10, 2007
Report
#2007-DE-1005
The Wilmington Housing Authority, Wilmington, North Carolina, Needs to Improve Internal Controls Over Its Program
Marzo 08, 2007
Report
#2007-AT-1004