The Housing Authority of the City of Winston-Salem, North Carolina, Needs to Improve Financial Controls
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) awarded the Housing Authority of the City of Winston-Salem (Authority) $3.9 million in formula-based capital funds under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). HUD’s Office of Inspector General evaluated the Authority’s capacity to administer these funds. We found that the Authority generally has the capacity to administer these funds but needed to improve some...
Septiembre 29, 2009
Report
#2009-AT-1014
The High Point Housing Authority, High Point, North Carolina, Needs to Improve
HUD OIG performed an audit of the High Point Housing Authority’s (Authority) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program pursuant to a citizen’s complaint. Our objectives were to determine whether the Authority properly (1) enforced HUD’s housing quality standards, (2) calculated Section 8 administrative fees, and (3) determined housing assistance subsidies and issued vouchers to qualified...
Agosto 17, 2009
Report
#2009-AT-1010
The Chattanooga Housing Authority Mismanaged Its Finances
We audited the Chattanooga Housing Authority's (Authority) financial operations after the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Public Housing, Tennessee State Office, informed us of the Authority's deteriorating financial condition. We began with a review of the Authority's development activities but expanded the review based on our survey results.
The Authority, with the exception of $49,316 in...
Junio 11, 2009
Report
#2009-AT-1007
The City of Durham, North Carolina, Did Not Adequately Administer Its Community Development Block Grant Program
We audited the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program administered by the City of Durham, North Carolina (City). The objective of the audit was to determine whether the City administered its program in accordance with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements. We selected the City for review based on HUD's risk assessment and previous monitoring reviews.
The City did not administer its CDBG program in...
Marzo 31, 2009
Report
#2009-AT-1004
The City of Durham, North Carolina, Did Not Comply with All Federal Procurement Requirements
We audited the City of Durham (City), North Carolina's HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) program. Our audit objective was to determine whether the City complied with applicable federal procurement requirements with respect to its homeowner rehabilitation activity. This is the second of two audits of the City's program.
The City did not advertise for homeowner rehabilitation contractors as required. Also, it did not take necessary...
Septiembre 24, 2008
Report
#2008-AT-1015
The City of Durham, North Carolina Did Not Comply with HOME Investment Partnerships Requirements
We audited the City of Durham (City), North Carolina 's HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) program as part of our annual audit plan. Our audit objectives were to determine whether the City complied with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements for monitoring HOME subrecipients and recording and using HOME program income.
The City did not always perform required monitoring reviews or provide adequate evidence that...
Agosto 07, 2008
Report
#2008-AT-1011
The Wilmington Housing Authority, Wilmington, North Carolina, Did Not Follow HUD Requirements for Its Nonprofit Development Activities
Septiembre 26, 2007
Report
#2007-AT-1011
The Wilmington Housing Authority, Wilmington, North Carolina, Needs to Improve Internal Controls Over Its Program
Marzo 08, 2007
Report
#2007-AT-1004