U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Línea Directa

REPORTAR FRAUDE, DESPERDICIO O ABUSO
  • Recommendation Number: 2017-FW-1006-002-B
  • Status: Closed
  • Date Issued: Abril 26, 2017
Closed Date:
Junio 20, 2018

Monitor the Authority to ensure it is holding its board meetings, as required by its bylaws.

Publication Report

2017-FW-1006 | Abril 26, 2017

The Housing Authority of the City of Jasper, TX, Did Not Operate Its Public Housing Programs in Compliance With HUD’s Requirements

In coordination with our Office of Investigations, we audited the Housing Authority of the City of Jasper, TX, because we received a complaint.  The complainant’s allegations included the executive director’s misuse of Authority vehicles and other... más

Related Recommendations

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1006-001-A
    Closed on Enero 24, 2022
    $27,818.00
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Summary

    Repay from nonfederal funds $27,818 to its Capital Funds program from non-Federal funds for the ineligible purchase of the truck and expenditure of 2013 funds before they were available.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1006-001-B
    Closed on Agosto 29, 2018
    $7,446.00
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Summary

    Repay from nonfederal funds its HUD programs $7,446 for the executive director’s personal use of the Authority’s equipment, and amend the executive director’s prior Internal Revenue Forms W-2 to include the annual personal use of $5,888 as income.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1006-001-C
    Closed on Julio 20, 2020
    $4,739.00
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Summary

    Repay from nonfederal funds its HUD programs $4,739 paid to its fee accountant, which had a conflict of interest with the executive director.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1006-001-D
    Closed on Agosto 29, 2018
    $1,273.00
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Summary

    Repay from nonfederal funds its HUD programs $1,273 lost on the conflict of interest sale of the Authority’s vehicle to the executive director’s daughter.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1006-001-E
    Closed on Agosto 29, 2018
    $1,034.00
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Summary

    Repay from nonfederal funds its HUD programs $1,034 for ineligible charges on the Authority’s credit cards.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1006-001-F
    Closed on Agosto 29, 2018
    $652.00
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Summary

    Support or repay from nonfederal funds its HUD programs $652 for unsupported charges on the Authority’s credit card.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1006-001-G
    Closed on Agosto 29, 2018
    $4,000.00
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Summary

    Repay from nonfederal funds its HUD programs $4,000 paid for an ineligible 2011 training conference.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1006-001-H
    Closed on Septiembre 04, 2018
    $44,994.00
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Summary

    Provide support for the reasonableness of the unit repairs costs totaling $44,994 and repay from nonfederal funds any unsupported or unreasonable amount.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1006-001-I
    Closed on Junio 20, 2018
    Summary

    Provide training for the Authority’s commissioners on their responsibilities and duties.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1006-001-J
    Closed on Junio 11, 2018
    Summary

    Require the Authority to update its policies and procedures so that they contain current Federal guidance.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1006-002-A
    Closed on Junio 20, 2018
    Summary

    Provide technical assistance to the Mayor and the board concerning their responsibilities regarding the Authority.

General Counsel

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1006-001-K
    Closed on Agosto 27, 2019
    Summary

    We recommend that the Director, Departmental Enforcement Center take appropriate administrative sanctions, including suspension, limited denial of participation, or debarment against the executive director.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1006-001-L
    Closed on Agosto 21, 2017
    Summary

    We recommend that the Director, Departmental Enforcement Center seek civil money penalties, as appropriate, against the executive director.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2017-FW-1006-001-M
    Closed on Julio 02, 2020
    $10,000.00
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Summary

    We recommend that the Associate General Counsel for Program Enforcement determine legal sufficiency and, if legally sufficient, pursue remedies under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act against the executive director.