U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Closed Date:
Septiembre 14, 2021

Reimburse its program $29,226 from non-Federal funds ($27,737 for housing assistance payments and $1,489 in associated administrative fees) for the 22 units that materially failed to meet HUD’s housing quality standards.

Publication Report

2018-PH-1002 | Febrero 15, 2018

The Fairmont-Morgantown Housing Authority, Fairmont, WV, Did Not Always Ensure That Its Program Units Met Housing Quality Standards and That It Accurately Calculated Housing Assistance Payment Abatements

We audited the Fairmont-Morgantown Housing Authority’s Housing Choice Voucher program because (1) we received a complaint alleging that the Authority did not follow program requirements, (2) the Authority administered 1,117 vouchers and received more... más

Related Recommendations

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-PH-1002-001-A
    Closed on Diciembre 04, 2018
    Summary

    Certify, along with the owners of the 63 units cited in this finding, that the applicable housing quality standards violations have been corrected.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-PH-1002-001-C
    Closed on Diciembre 04, 2018
    $1,241,550.00
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Summary

    Develop and implement procedures and controls to ensure that program units meet housing quality standards and inspectors are adequately trained to perform inspections, thereby ensuring that an estimated $1,241,550 in program funds is spent for units that are decent, safe and sanitary.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-PH-1002-001-D
    Closed on Septiembre 30, 2019
    $3,822.00
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A] resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B] that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost]; or (C] that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Summary

    Reimburse its program $3,822 from non-Federal funds for housing assistance payments that should have been abated.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-PH-1002-001-E
    Closed on Agosto 15, 2018
    $267.00
    Funds Put to Better Use

    Recommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.

    Summary

    Reimburse five owners $267 for the excess housing assistance payments it abated.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-PH-1002-001-F
    Closed on Diciembre 04, 2018
    Summary

    Develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure that extensions granted to owners to make repairs after failed inspections comply with HUD regulations.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-PH-1002-001-G
    Closed on Agosto 21, 2018
    Summary

    Develop and implement controls to ensure that abatements are properly calculated and procedures in its administrative plan are followed.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2018-PH-1002-001-H
    Closed on Agosto 30, 2018
    Summary

    Train its staff on the proper abatement of housing assistance payments.