Weaknesses in the New Core Project Were Not Adequately Addressed
We audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) New Core Project as part of the internal control assessments required for the fiscal year 2015 financial statement audit under the Chief Financial Officer’s Act of 1990. Our objective was to assess the status of the project and to determine whether the New Core Project team complied with Federal regulations and departmental project management processes. This...
Junio 12, 2015
Report
#2015-DP-0006
The City of New York, NY, Did Not Always Disburse Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery Funds in Accordance With Federal Regulations
We completed a review of the City of New York, Office of Management and Budget’s administration of the Business Loan and Grant Program funded with Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) funds provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to assist in the disaster recovery and rebuilding efforts resulting from Hurricane Sandy. The objectives of the audit were to determine whether the City (1...
Junio 12, 2015
Report
#2015-NY-1007
The Housing Authority of Bexar County, TX, Did Not Operate Its HUD Public Housing Programs in Accordance With Regulations and Other Requirements
Because of an anonymous complaint, we reviewed the Housing Authority of Bexar County, TX. The complaint included allegations of improper procurement, improper use of Authority funds, misuse of the Authority’s credit card, and violations of Housing Choice Voucher regulations. Our objective was to determine whether the Authority operated its public housing and Housing Choice Voucher programs in accordance with the U.S. Department of...
Junio 11, 2015
Memorandum
#2015-FW-1806
The State of New Jersey Did Not Comply With Federal Procurement and Cost Principle Requirements in Implementing Its Disaster Management System
We audited the State of New Jersey’s Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery-funded Sandy Integrated Recovery Operations and Management System. We conducted the audit based on the significant amount of funds associated with the system and the importance of the system to the successful implementation of the State’s Disaster Recovery grant. Our objective was to determine whether the State procured services and products for...
Junio 04, 2015
Report
#2015-PH-1003
The Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA, Used Shelter Plus Care Program Funds for Ineligible and Unsupported Participants
We audited the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino’s Shelter Plus Care program due to a public complaint alleging that the Authority disregarded U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) program requirements related to participants’ eligibility. Our objective was to determine whether the Authority administered its program funds in accordance with HUD rules and requirements, specifically related to participants’...
Mayo 29, 2015
Report
#2015-LA-1004
NTFN, Inc., Did Not Always Follow HUD and FHA Requirements
We reviewed NTFN, Inc., based on the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) goal to protect the integrity of the Federal Housing Administration’s (FHA) housing insurance and guarantee programs. We selected NTFN because its loan default rate was the second highest in the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area from July 2012 through June 2014. NTFN originated 3,046 FHA loans in the...
Mayo 26, 2015
Report
#2015-FW-1001
The State of Wyoming Did Not Always Administer Its CDBG Program in Accordance With Applicable Requirements
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Inspector General audited the State of Wyoming’s Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program run by the Wyoming Business Council. Our audit objective was to determine whether the State reimbursed only approved costs, its grant agreements contained all required language, it properly monitored its projects, and it ensured that projects met the national objective in...
Mayo 26, 2015
Report
#2015-DE-1001
First Niagara Bank, Lockport, NY, Did Not Always Properly Implement HUD’s Loss Mitigation Requirements in Servicing FHA-Insured Mortgages
We completed a review of First Niagara Bank’s servicing of Federal Housing Administration (FHA)-insured mortgages and its implementation of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Loss Mitigation program. We selected First Niagara Bank based on an Office of Inspector General risk assessment of single-family lenders. The objective of the audit was to determine whether First Niagara Bank properly serviced FHA-...
Mayo 22, 2015
Report
#2015-NY-1006
HUD Did Not Comply With IPERA Due to Significant Deficiencies in Its Reporting and Risk Assessment Processes
We audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) fiscal year 2014 compliance with the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010 (IPERA) in accordance with the requirements of IPERA. Our audit objectives were to (1) determine HUD’s compliance with IPERA reporting and improper payments reduction requirements; (2) determine whether HUD’s reporting of improper payments data, including the agency’s...
Mayo 15, 2015
Report
#2015-FO-0005
The Bucks County Housing Authority, Doylestown, PA, Did Not Always Ensure That Its Program Units Met Housing Quality Standards
We audited the Bucks County Housing Authority’s Housing Choice Voucher program because the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) authorized it more than $15 million per year in fiscal years 2012 to 2014 and we had not audited its housing quality standards inspection program. Our audit objective was to determine whether the Authority ensured that its Housing Choice Voucher program units met HUD’s housing quality standards...
Mayo 05, 2015
Report
#2015-PH-1002
The City of Paterson, NJ’s HOME Investment Partnerships Program Controls Did Not Ensure Compliance With Regulations
We audited the City of Paterson, NJ’s HOME Investment Partnerships Program based on a risk analysis of the City’s program that considered the amount of funding, the risk score assigned by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), our identification of potential issues, and Congress’ general interest in the HOME program. The objective of the audit was to determine whether City officials had established and implemented...
Abril 30, 2015
Report
#2015-NY-1005
Memorandum Report on HUD’s Processes used to Report Information Technology Investments on IT Dashboard
The Office of Evaluation performed preliminary research of the HUD Office of the Chief Information Officer’s (OCIO) management of the agency’s reporting of financial and project information on the Federal IT Dashboard (Dashboard). The objective of the evaluation was to determine if OCIO processes ensured accurate IT investment information was reported on the Dashboard. We found that project managers did not consistently follow...
Abril 29, 2015
Report
#2014-OE-0007
Sutton Irvine Residence, Inc., Irvine, CA, Did Not Operate Its Section 202 - Funded Project in Accordance With HUD Rules and Requirements
We audited Sutton Irvine Residence, Inc.’s Section 202-funded project based on concerns expressed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Office of General Counsel, Departmental Enforcement Center, regarding the management of the project. The concern was that Sutton Irvine had defaulted on its mortgage payments to HUD and may have diverted project funds for nonproject expenses. Our audit objective was to...
Abril 24, 2015
Report
#2015-LA-1003
The Housing Authority of the City of Comer Did Not Comply With Conflict-of-Interest and Procurement Requirements
We audited the Housing Authority of the City of Comer’s financial and procurement operations. We selected the Authority based on concerns from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Georgia State Office of Public Housing regarding significant deficiencies identified during its August 2013 management review. HUD’s Office of Public Housing identified findings regarding the misuse of funds, a lack of governance...
Abril 24, 2015
Report
#2015-AT-1002
The City of New York, NY, Generally Disbursed Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery Assistance Funds for Administrative Costs in Accordance With HUD Regulations
We audited the City of New York, Office of Management and Budget’s administration of the Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery Assistance (CDBG-DR) funds awarded to the City as a result of damages caused by Hurricane Sandy. This review was related to the disbursement of approximately $4 million in CDBG-DR funds pertaining to administration costs. The objectives of the audit were to determine whether the City (1)...
Abril 23, 2015
Report
#2015-NY-1004
HUD’s Claim Payment System Did Not Always Identify Ineligible FHA-HAMP Partial Claims
We audited HUD Federal Housing Administration’s (FHA) Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) partial claim option. We audited the FHA-HAMP partial claim option because we had not reviewed the program since 2011 and the requirements had changed. Our audit objective was to determine whether HUD had adequate controls over FHA-HAMP partial claim payments.
HUD’s claim payment controls for the FHA-HAMP partial claim option were not...
Abril 20, 2015
Report
#2015-LA-0001
The Chicago Housing Authority, Chicago, IL, Did Not Always Make Payments for Outside Legal Services in Compliance With Requirements
We conducted a review of the Chicago Housing Authority’s payments for outside legal services in conjunction with an ongoing internal audit of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) oversight of public housing agencies’ expenditures for outside legal services. Our review objective was to determine whether the Authority made payments for outside legal services in compliance with applicable requirements.
We found that...
Abril 20, 2015
Memorandum
#2015-PH-1805
Veterans First, Santa Ana, CA, Did Not Administer and Spend Its HUD Funding in Accordance With HUD Requirements
We audited Veterans First’s Supportive Housing Program (SHP) based on a referral from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Inspector General’s Office of Investigation and a hotline complaint, alleging that Veterans First employees were directed to prepare false accounting documents. Our objective was to determine whether expenditures Veterans First charged to its SHP grants and program fees it charged to...
Abril 16, 2015
Report
#2015-LA-1002
The Oakland Housing Authority Complied With HUD Requirements on the Use of Housing Choice Voucher Exception Payment Standards
The U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Inspector General (OIG), conducted a limited review of the Oakland Housing Authority’s Moving to Work Housing Choice Voucher program’s use of exception payment standards exceeding the Authority’s 110 percent limit on fair market rents. The review was initiated as a result of a congressional request alleging fraud, waste, and abuse by public housing agencies...
Abril 15, 2015
Memorandum
#2015-LA-1801
Redwood Juniper Tacoma Apartments Did Not Always Administer Its Program in Accordance With HUD Rules and Regulations
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Inspector General audited the Redwood Juniper Tacoma Apartments to determine whether Redwood Juniper’s owner took an unauthorized distribution in excess of surplus cash, procured services in accordance with HUD rules and regulations, and maintained an auditable waiting list. We selected the multifamily housing project for audit because it appeared that the project owner took...
Abril 14, 2015
Report
#2015-SE-1001