Allied Home Mortgage Capital Corporation, Houston, Texas, Did Not Fully Follow HUD's Branch Office Requirements
We reviewed Allied Home Mortgage Capital Corporation (Allied), a nonsupervised loan correspondent. The objective of the review was to determine the validity of a hotline complaint that Allied operated its branches in violation of U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements.
The complaint was partially valid as Allied did not fully follow HUD's branch office requirements. Allied required branch managers to personally...
Febrero 09, 2009
Report
#2009-FW-1005
St. Vincent de Paul Village, Inc., San Diego, California, Generally Administered Its Supportive Housing Program Grants in Accordance with HUD Requirements
We audited the use of Supportive Housing Program funds by St. Vincent de Paul Village, Inc. (St. Vincent de Paul Village), because it is a large organization receiving more than $4 million in grants annually. Our objective was to determine whether St. Vincent de Paul Village used supportive housing grants in accordance with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements and the grant agreements.
St. Vincent de Paul Village...
Febrero 08, 2009
Report
#2009-LA-1006
HUD’s Monitoring of the Performance-Based Contract Administrators Was Inadequate
We initiated a review of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) monitoring of the performance-based contract administration contract administrators (PBCA) because of our prior audits that reported that HUD paid contract administrators $27.2 million during fiscal year 2006 for work HUD had eliminated and that the Los Angeles multifamily hub did not properly monitor its contractor. Our audit objective was to determine...
Febrero 05, 2009
Report
#2009-SE-0002
The St. Louis Housing Authority Did Not Perform Adequate Physical Inventories
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Inspector General, audited the St. Louis Housing Authority in St. Louis, Missouri. Our objective was to determine whether the Authority took complete physical inventories and maintained adequate property records. We concluded that the Authority did not perform complete physical inventories in fiscal years 2006, 2007, or 2008 or reconcile the results of the inventories...
Febrero 02, 2009
Report
#2009-KC-1004
The City of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, Generally Administered Its Community Development Block Grant Program in Accordance with HUD Requirements
We audited the City of Bethlehem's (City) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program as a result of a citizen complaint. Our audit objective was to determine whether the City administered its CDBG program in compliance with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requirements. We focused our review on whether the City (1) had adequate internal controls over its management process, accounting, and data processing; (2)...
Febrero 01, 2009
Report
#2009-PH-1005
The City of Camden, New Jersey, Did Not Always Administer Its Asset Control Area Program in Compliance with HUD Requirements
We audited the City of Camden's (City) asset control area (ACA) program following a request from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Office of Single Family Asset Management for a review of the City's compliance with its ACA agreement with HUD. Our objective was to determine whether the City complied with specific requirements in the ACA agreement pertaining to the resale of properties it acquired from HUD...
Enero 29, 2009
Report
#2009-PH-1004
HUD's Receivership Did Not Ensure That the Housing Authority of New Orleans Properly Accounted for Its Fungibility Funding, Monitored and Paid Two of Its Contractors, and Paid Its Accounts Payable Disbursements
At the request of two United States senators, we initiated an audit of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) administration of the Housing Authority of New Orleans (Authority) to determine the effect of HUD's receivership on the Authority's performance in its contracting activities and financial functions. Specifically, we wanted to determine whether HUD's receivership ensured that the Authority...
Enero 28, 2009
Report
#2009-AO-0002
The Portage Metropolitan Housing Authority, Ravenna, Ohio, Improperly Operated Its Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Office of Inspector General audited the Portage Metropolitan Housing Authority's (Authority) Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program (program) under its Moving to Work Demonstration program. The audit was part of the activities in our fiscal year 2008 annual audit plan. We selected the Authority based upon our analysis of risk factors relating to the housing agencies in...
Enero 27, 2009
Report
#2009-CH-1003
Housing Authorities at Bath and Brunswick, Maine, Overpaid Basic Rent and Housing Assistance Payments for Section 8 Tenants in a Subsidized Multifamily Project (Orchard Court)
We performed an audit of the Orchard Court project, a Section 236 multifamily property, located in Bath, Maine. As part of our audit, we reviewed subsidy payments made to Orchard Court from Bath and Brunswick, Maine, Housing Authorities (Authorities). Our objective was to determine whether Section 8 voucher program subsidies paid to Orchard Court from the Authorities were for basic rent, rather than market rent. Basic rent is the minimum rent a...
Enero 26, 2009
Memorandum
#2009-BO-1801
The City of Rome, New York, Did Not Always Administer Its Community Development Block Grant Program in Accordance with HUD Requirements
We completed an audit of the City of Rome, New York's (City) administration of its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The objectives of our audit were to determine whether the City (1) administered its CDBG program effectively, efficiently, and economically in accordance with applicable rules and regulations and (2) expended CDBG funds for eligible activities that met a national objective of the program.
The audit disclosed...
Enero 25, 2009
Report
#2009-NY-1006
The City of Rome, New York, Did Not Always Administer Its Community Development Block Grant Program in Accordance with HUD Requirements
Enero 25, 2009
Report
#2009-NY-1006
The Indianapolis Housing Agency, Indianapolis, Indiana, Failed to Operate Its Housing Choice Voucher Program According to HUD's and Its Requirements
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Office of Inspector General audited the Indianapolis Housing Agency's (Agency) Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program. The audit was part of the activities in our fiscal year 2008 annual audit plan. We selected the Agency's program based upon our prior audits of the Agency's program and recent press coverage regarding conditions at two of the Agency's Section...
Enero 22, 2009
Report
#2009-CH-1002
The Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Did Not Ensure Thats Its Leased Housing Units Met Housing Quality Standards under Its Moving to Work Program
We audited the Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh's (Authority) administration of its leased housing under its Moving to Work Demonstration (Moving to Work) program as part of our fiscal year 2008 audit plan. This is our second audit report issued on the Authority's program. The audit objective addressed in this report was to determine whether the Authority ensured that its leased housing units met the U.S. Department of...
Enero 14, 2009
Report
#2009-PH-1003
The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs Properly Administered Supplemental I Disaster Recovery Program Funds
We audited the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Supplemental I Disaster Recovery program, administered by the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs (Department). We performed the audit as part of the Office of Inspector General's commitment to HUD to implement oversight of the Disaster Recovery funds to prevent fraud, waste, and abuse and duplication of...
Enero 13, 2009
Report
#2009-FW-1004
Cook County, Illinois, Failed to Adequately Manage its HOME Investment Partnerships Program
The U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Office of Inspector General audited Cook County's (County) HOME Investment Partnerships Program (Program). The audit was part of the activities in our fiscal year 2008 annual audit plan. We selected the County based upon our analysis of risk factors relating to Program grantees in Region V's jurisdiction. Our audit objectives were to determine whether the County...
Enero 12, 2009
Report
#2009-CH-1004
The Housing Authority of Douglas County, Roseburg, Oregon, Needs to Strengthen Its Internal Controls
At the request of HUD's Region X Office of Public Housing, we audited the Housing Authority of Douglas County, Oregon, (Authority) to determine whether the Authority procured goods and services in accordance with HUD regulations and its procurement policy, accounted for HUD funds in accordance with HUD's administrative requirements and managed its Housing Choice Voucher program in accordance with HUD regulations.
We found the...
Enero 08, 2009
Report
#2009-SE-1001
The City of Hartford, Connecticut, Did Not Always Comply with Its Annual Contributions Contracts and HUD Regulations in Administering Its Housing Choice Voucher Program
We audited the City of Hartford, Connecticut's (City) administration of its Housing Choice Voucher program (Voucher program) as part of our annual audit plan. Our overall audit objective was to determine whether the City properly administered its Voucher program in compliance with its annual contributions contracts and HUD regulations.
The City generally administered its Voucher program in compliance with its annual contributions contracts...
Enero 04, 2009
Report
#2009-BO-1004
The City of San Diego, California Did Not Administer Its Community Development Block Grant Program in Accordance with HUD Requirements When Funding the City's Redevelopment Agency Projects
We audited the City of San Diego's (City) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program in response to a hotline complaint alleging that the City and its Redevelopment Agency (Agency) were violating U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) rules and regulations. Our main objective was to address the citizen complaint and determine whether the City administered CDBG loans issued to the Agency in accordance with HUD rules and...
Diciembre 29, 2008
Report
#2009-LA-1005
Housing Authority of the City of El Paso, El Paso, Texas, Did Not Follow Procurement and Other Requirements
Based on a congressional request, we performed an audit of the Housing Authority City of El Paso's (Authority) procurement process and board of commissioners (board) activities. Our objectives were to determine whether the Authority properly followed procurement requirements and whether the executive director was selected in accordance with applicable procedures.
The Authority did not follow its procurement policies or the U. S. Department...
Diciembre 23, 2008
Report
#2009-FW-1003
The City of New York's Department Housing Preservation and Development, New York, New York, Had Administrative Weaknesses in Its HOME Program
We completed an audit of the City of New York's Department of Housing Preservation and Development (the City), New York, New York to evaluate its administration of the HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME). The audit objectives were to determine whether the City (1) properly committed and disbursed HOME funds; (2) adequately monitored its community housing development organizations, projects, and contractors; and (3) correctly...
Diciembre 22, 2008
Report
#2008-NY-1003