U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know

The .gov means it’s official.

Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.

The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Hotline

Report Fraud, Waste and Abuse
Export
Date Issued
2005-CH-1010 | April 08, 2005

Kankakee County Housing Authority Low-Rent Housing Program, Kankakee, IL

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2005-CH-1010-001-A
    $119,376
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    We recommend that HUD’s Director of Public Housing Hub, Chicago Regional Office, assure that the Authority reduces its Low-Rent Performance Funding Operating Subsidy by $119,376 for the excessive operating subsidy cited in this finding.

2005-CH-1003 | November 29, 2004

Royal Oak Township Housing Commission, Public Housing Program, Ferndale, Michigan

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2005-CH-1003-001-A
    $367,516
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    We recommend that HUD’s Director of Public Housing Hub, Detroit Field Office, assure the Royal Oak Township Housing Commission: Reimburse its Public Housing Program $367,516 from non-Federal funds for the improper use of HUD operating subsidy funds cited in this finding.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2005-CH-1003-002-A
    $45,220
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    We recommend that HUD’s Director of Public Housing Hub, Detroit Field Office, assure the Royal Oak Township Housing Commission: Reimburse its Public Housing Program $45,220 from non-Federal funds for the operating subsidy that was not used in accordance with HUD's One Strike Policy.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2005-CH-1003-002-C
    $3,340
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    We recommend that HUD’s Director of Public Housing Hub, Detroit Field Office, assure the Royal Oak Township Housing Commission: Reimburse its Public Housing Program $3,340 from non-Federal funds for thee ineligible travel costs.

2004-AT-1006 | April 22, 2004

Puerto Rico Public Housing Administration, San Juan, Puerto Rico

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2004-AT-1006-001-B
    $4,230,646
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Require the PRPHA to submit all supporting documentation and determine the accuracy of the $4,230,646 owed by PBA and its public housing management agents. Any amounts determined ineligible must be reimbursed to the ACC projects, from non-Federal funds.

2004-BO-1002 | November 04, 2003

Family Living Adult Care Center FHA Project Number 024-22019 Biddeford and Saco, Maine

Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2004-BO-1002-001-A
    $2,687,822
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Recover from owner $2,687,822, the difference between $3,662,822 owed to HUD by owner and $975,000 proceeds of foreclosure sale.

2003-CH-1019 | July 25, 2003

Section 8 Housing Program

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2003-CH-1019-001-B
    $533,432
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Establishes a formal repayment agreement with the Housing Authority that will allow the current debt owed to HUD of $533,432 to be repaid without disrupting the Section 8 Program. The following should be included in the agreement: prior HUD approval of the Housing Authority's proposed budgets; and a requirement that the Housing Authority revise its funding requisitions when leasing levels materially change so that future overpayments will be avoided.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2003-CH-1019-002-A
    $42,206
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Reimburses its Section 8 Voucher Program $42,206 from non-Federal funds for the ineligible costs cited in this finding.

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2003-CH-1019-002-B
    $1,672
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Provides documentation to support the $1,672 of unsupported payments cited in this finding. If documentation cannot be provided, then the Authority should reimburse its Section 8 Voucher Program from non-Federal funds for the amount that cannot be supported.

2003-CH-1014 | March 28, 2003

Coshocton Metropolitan Housing Authority Public Housing Program

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2003-CH-1014-002-A
    $72,329
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Provides documentation to support the $72,329 of unsupported salaries and wages cited in this finding. If documentation cannot be provided, the Authority should reimburse its Public Housing Program the appropriate amount from non-Federal funds.

2003-CH-1011 | March 24, 2003

Coshocton Metropolitan Housing Authority Comprehensive Improvement Assistance Program

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2003-CH-1011-001-A
    $287,224
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Ensures that the $287,224 of housing work cited in this finding is completed correctly using non-federal funds. If the Authority is unable to ensure the work is completed correctly, then the Authority should reimburse its Comprehensive Assistance Improvement Program (now the Capital Fund Program) from non-Federal funds the applicable amount of work not completed correctly or not provided.

2002-PH-1005 | September 30, 2002

Philadelphia Regional Alliance of HUD Tenants, OTAG and ITAG, Philadelphia PA

Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2002-PH-1005-001-D
    $23,422
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Reimburse HUD for the $23,422 ineligible expenditures charged to the grant.

2001-AT-1001 | October 20, 2000

Housing Authority of the City of Miami Beach, Miami Beach, Florida

Public and Indian Housing

  •  
    Status
      Open
      Closed
    2001-AT-1001-001-A
    $795,178
    Questioned Costs

    Recommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.

    Obtain additional supporting documentation or recover from city $795,178 paid for police protection, recreation and code enforcement activities.

Displaying 3041 - 3053 of 3053 Recommendations