Develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure that all windows replaced meet lead hazard qualifications.
2018-KC-1002 | April 06, 2018
The Kansas City, MO, Health Department Did Not Spend Lead Based Paint Hazard Control Grant Funds in Accordance With HUD Requirements
Lead Hazard Control
2018-KC-1002-002-B
Closed on November 01, 20192018-KC-1002-002-C
Closed on November 01, 2019Develop and implement quality control procedures to ensure that all bid specifications are reviewed for qualified items based on the risk assessment results.
2018-KC-1002-003-A
Closed on November 01, 2019Update the Health Department’s work plan to include policies and procedures for defining, determining, and documenting relocation hardship for all participants.
2018-KC-1002-004-A
Closed on November 01, 2019Develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure that the property owners receive the required information concerning lead-based paint disclosure requirements, risk assessment results, summaries of treatments and clearances, and ongoing maintenance activities, including how to report paint deterioration.
2018-CF-1803 | March 30, 2018
Final Civil Action: Southern Blvd I, L.P., Settled Allegations of Making False Certifications Related to Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments
General Counsel
2018-CF-1803-001-A
Closed on March 30, 2018$40,000Questioned CostsRecommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Acknowledge that $40,000 in the attached settlement represents an amount due HUD.
2018-PH-1003 | March 30, 2018
The Crisfield Housing Authority, Crisfield, MD, Did Not Properly Administer Its Housing Choice Voucher Program
General Counsel
2018-PH-1003-002-C
Closed on September 30, 2019Evaluate the apparent conflict-of-interest situation in this report and pursue administrative sanctions if warranted.
Public and Indian Housing
2018-PH-1003-001-A
Closed on June 08, 2023$561,122Questioned CostsRecommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Provide documentation to support $280,561 (housing assistance and utility allowance payments totaling $237,809 for families that did not meet eligibility requirements and $42,752 in administrative fees) or reimburse its program from non-Federal funds for any amounts it cannot support.
2018-PH-1003-001-B
Closed on September 27, 2018$17,101Questioned CostsRecommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Reimburse its program $17,101 from non-Federal funds for the overpayment of housing assistance and utility allowances to 14 families.
2018-PH-1003-001-C
Closed on September 25, 2019$984Funds Put to Better UseRecommendations that funds be put to better use estimate funds that could be used more efficiently. For example, recommendations that funds be put to better use could result in reductions in spending, deobligation of funds, or avoidance of unnecessary spending.
Reimburse five households $984 from program funds for the underpayment of housing assistance and utility reimbursements due to incorrect calculations.
2018-PH-1003-001-D
Closed on September 18, 2019Develop and implement procedures and controls to ensure that housing assistance and utility allowance payments are correctly calculated, including the use of the Enterprise Income Verification system to verify household income, and that they are adequately supported.
2018-PH-1003-001-E
Closed on September 14, 2020Correct the errors in the files identified in this report.
2018-PH-1003-001-F
Closed on September 19, 2019Develop and implement procedures and controls to ensure that required eligibility documentation is obtained and maintained to support households’ selection from its waiting list and admission to and continued assistance on the program.
2018-PH-1003-001-G
Closed on April 30, 2020Develop and implement controls to ensure that employees comply with its computer, internet, and email use policy and use only official business email accounts to transmit confidential information.
2018-PH-1003-001-H
Closed on September 19, 2019Develop and implement controls to ensure that its Section 8 coordinator is adequately trained and supervised to ensure that the program operates in accordance with requirements.
2018-PH-1003-001-I
Closed on September 18, 2019Follow its administrative plan to ensure that program requirements are met.
2018-PH-1003-001-K
Closed on September 18, 2019Provide technical assistance to the Authority to ensure that it properly administers its program and that program regulations are met.
2018-PH-1003-001-L
Closed on April 30, 2020Evaluate the Authority’s email system and its computer, internet, and email use policy to determine whether they provide sufficient safeguards for transmitting and handling confidential information.
2018-PH-1003-002-A
Closed on June 08, 2023$238,046Questioned CostsRecommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Reimburse its program $119,023 from non-Federal funds for the ineligible housing assistance payments it made due to the conflict-of-interest situation identified by the audit and any additional ineligible housing assistance payments it made outside our review period.
2018-PH-1003-002-B
Closed on September 18, 2019Develop and implement controls to prevent and detect conflict-of-interest situations.
2018-LA-1003 | March 29, 2018
The City of South Gate, CA, Did Not Administer Its Community Development Block Grant Program in Accordance With HUD Requirements
Community Planning and Development
2018-LA-1003-001-A
$811,325Questioned CostsRecommendations with questioned costs identify costs: (A) resulting from an alleged violation of a law, regulation, contract, grant, or other document or agreement governing the use of Federal funds; (B) that are not supported by adequate documentation (also known as an unsupported cost); or (C) that appear unnecessary or unreasonable.
Provide documentation to support the $811,325 in code enforcement costs (activities 591, 619, and 645), including meeting code enforcement and salary and benefit requirements,4 or repay the program from non-Federal funds.