The Offices of Audit and Evaluation supervise and conduct independent and objective audits, evaluations, and other reviews of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD] programs and activities to ensure they operate economically, efficiently, and effectively. This page contains links to our audit and evaluation reports and memoranda.
The Allegheny County Housing Authority, Pittsburgh, PA, Did Not Always Procure Goods and Services or Obligate Funds According to Recovery Act and Applicable HUD Requirements
We audited the Allegheny County Housing Authority’s administration of its Public Housing Capital Fund grants that it received under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. We selected the Authority for audit because it received a $7.7 million formula grant and three competitive grants totaling $5.8 million, which was the third largest formula grant and the second largest amount of capital fund competitive grants awarded in...
Agosto 10, 2011
Report
#2011-PH-1014
The Saginaw Housing Commission, Saginaw, MI, Did Not Fully Implement Prior Audit Recommendations and Continued To Use Its Public Housing Program Funds for Ineligible Purposes
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Office of Inspector General audited the Saginaw Housing Commission’s Public Housing program. The audit was part of the activities in our fiscal year 2011 annual audit plan. We selected the Commission based upon our previous audit report on the Commission’s use of public housing funds, audit report number 2006-CH-1018, issued September 28, 2006, and an indication that the...
Agosto 09, 2011
Report
#2011-CH-1012
The Housing Authority of the City of Elizabeth, Elizabeth, NJ, Had Weaknesses in Its Capital Fund Program's Financial Controls
We audited the Housing Authority of the City of Elizabeth, New Jersey’s, (Authority) administration of its capital fund program (CFP) in support of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Office of the Inspector General’s (OIG) goal to contribute to improving HUD’s execution and accountability of fiscal responsibilities. The audit objectives were to determine whether Authority officials (1) obligated and expended...
Agosto 04, 2011
Report
#2011-NY-1011
The Housing Authority of the City of Elizabeth, Elizabeth, NJ, Had Weaknesses in Its Capital Fund Program’s Financial Controls
Agosto 04, 2011
Report
#2011-NY-1011
The Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System that Maintained Recovery Act Information Had Application Security Control Deficiencies
We audited the Disaster Recovery Grants Reporting (DRGR) system to determine whether adequate controls were in place to safeguard and accurately track and report $1.93 billion in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recover Act) funds allocated to the Office of Community Planning and Development’s (CPD) Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2. We found that the improvements that CPD made to the DRGR system within the last year...
Julio 28, 2011
Report
#2011-DP-0008
Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority, Cleveland, OH, Did Not Operate Its Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program According to HUD's Requirements
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Inspector General audited the Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority’s (Authority) Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program. The audit was part of the activities in our fiscal year 2011 annual audit plan. We selected the Authority based upon our analysis of risk factors relating to the housing agencies in Region V’s jurisdiction. Our objective was to determine whether...
Julio 28, 2011
Report
#2011-CH-1011
The Rockford Housing Authority, Rockford, IL, Needs to Improve Its American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Contract Administration Procedures
We audited the Rockford Housing Authority’s (Authority) American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) Public Housing Capital Fund Stimulus Formula and Competitive grants. The audit was part of the activities in our fiscal year 2011 annual audit plan. We selected the Authority based on a citizen complaint. Our objective was to determine whether the Authority administered its grants in accordance with Recovery Act and...
Julio 25, 2011
Report
#2011-CH-1010
Review of the National Environmental Policy Act and Core Activity Modules Within the Recovery Act Management and Performance System
We audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) management procedures, practices, and controls related to the Recovery Act Management and Reporting System (RAMPS). Our objective was to assess its capability to record and provide data required by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 on which HUD is required to report.
Overall, RAMPS had the capability to record Recovery Act data and produce the...
Julio 22, 2011
Report
#2011-DP-0007
Mountain States Mortgage Center, Sandy, UT, Did Not Follow HUD’s Underwriting, Quality Control, and Advertising Requirements
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Office of Inspector General audited Mountain States Mortgage Center to determine whether it underwrote insured loans in compliance with HUD requirements and whether its quality control plan met HUD requirements.
Mountain States underwrote 41 loans that did not comply with FHA requirements. Of the 41 FHA-insured loans reviewed, one of the loans had a significant underwriting...
Julio 22, 2011
Report
#2011-DE-1004
Chicanos Por La Causa, Inc., Did Not Always Administer its Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2 Grant as Required
We audited Chicanos Por La Causa, Inc.’s (grantee) Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2 (NSP2) grant to determine whether the grantee administered its NSP2 grant in accordance with HUD’s program requirements. We conducted the audit as part of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) fiscal year 2011 annual audit plan and to support HUD OIG’s fiscal year 2011 strategic goal to...
Julio 22, 2011
Report
#2011-LA-1015
The Housing Authority of the County of Monterey, Salinas, CA, Did Not Administer the Procurement and Contracting of Its Capital Fund Recovery Grant Funds in Accordance With HUD Laws and Regulations
We completed an audit of the Housing Authority of the County of Monterey’s (Authority) administration of more than $2.9 million in Capital Fund Recovery Grant funding as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Our objective was to determine whether the Authority administered the procurement and contracting of its grant funds in accordance with HUD laws and regulations. The Authority did not administer the...
Julio 21, 2011
Report
#2011-LA-1014
The Greensboro Housing Authority Needs To Improve Internal Controls for Administering Recovery Act Funds
We audited the Greensboro Housing Authority (Authority) as part of our annual plan to review public housing capital funds awarded under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act). The Authority received a $5.6 million Public Housing Capital Fund Stimulus (formula) Recovery Act Funded grant, the second highest in the State. It also received a Recovery Act funded $1.05 million capital fund competitive grant for...
Julio 21, 2011
Report
#2011-AT-1013
King County Housing Authority, Tukwila, WA, Generally Complied With Recovery Act Capital Fund Competition Grant Requirements
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Inspector General audited King County Housing Authority to determine whether its expenditures for three Recovery Act Capital Fund Competition Grants were appropriate, eligible, and adequately supported and whether related procurements were made in accordance with 24 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Part 85 and Recovery Act requirements. We selected the Authority because...
Julio 20, 2011
Report
#2011-SE-1007
The Housing Authority of the City of Camden, NJ, Did Not Ensure That Its Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program Units Met Housing Quality Standards
We audited the Housing Authority of the City of Camden NJ's administration of its housing quality standards inspection program for its Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program as part of our fiscal year 2010 audit plan. The audit objective addressed in this report was to determine whether the Authority ensured that its program units met the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) housing quality standards....
Julio 19, 2011
Report
#2011-PH-1013
US Dept of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Public Housing, San Francisco, CA, Monitored Recovery Act Grants Awarded to Region IX Public Housing Authority Grantees in Accordance with Applicable Requirements
We audited the monitoring practices that the San Francisco Office of Public Housing (SF OPH) used to monitor American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 supplemental capital formula and competitive grants awarded to public housing agencies in Region IX. The audit was conducted in accordance with a mandate to review the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) monitoring of Recovery Act funds to determine whether...
Julio 15, 2011
Report
#2011-LA-0003
HUD Needs To Obtain Complete Documentation To Close Ginnie Mae Contracts
We audited the Office of the Chief Procurement Officer’s (procurement office) procedures for closing out completed and expired Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae) contracts in compliance with applicable regulations. This audit was part of our audit plan for fiscal year 2010. Our objective was to determine whether the procurement office performed timely closeouts on completed and expired Ginnie Mae contracts.
The...
Julio 15, 2011
Report
#2011-HA-0003
The Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles, Monterey Park, CA, Generally Administered the Procurement and Contracting of Its Recovery Act Capital Fund Formula Grant in Accordance With HUD Requirements
We audited the Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles’ American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Capital Fund formula grant. We performed the audit because Recovery Act reviews are part of the Office of the Inspector General’s (OIG) annual plan and because the Authority was the fourth highest overall recipient of Recovery Act capital funds in California. Our audit objective was to determine whether the Authority administered the...
Julio 14, 2011
Report
#2011-LA-1013
The City of Dunkirk, NY, Used Community Development Block Grant Recovery Act Funding for an Ineligible Activity
We conducted a review of the City of Dunkirk, NY (City), pertaining to its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds received under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act). We selected this auditee based on a congressional interest inquiry received by the Recovery Act Transparency and Accountability Board and forwarded to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Office of Inspector...
Julio 14, 2011
Memorandum
#2011-NY-1802
FHA Has Improved Its Annual Lender Renewal Process, but Challenges Remain
The U. S. Department of Housing and Urban - Office of Inspector General audited the Federal Housing Administration’s (FHA) Title II single-family lender renewal process. Our objective was to determine whether FHA’s Lender Approval and Recertification Division’s (Division) controls were adequate for determining whether lenders met FHA annual renewal requirements.
The Division had taken significant steps to strengthen its controls over...
Julio 14, 2011
Report
#2011-KC-0001
The Office of the Commissioner for Municipal Affairs Did Not Always Ensure Compliance With Block Grant Recovery Act Program Requirements
We audited the Office of the Commissioner for Municipal Affairs’ (OCAM) State Community Development Block Grant (Block Grant) funds that it received under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act). We selected OCAM for review as part of our strategic plan, based on the amount of Block Grant Recovery Act funds allocated. The objectives of this audit were to determine whether OCAM (1) disbursed Block Grant...
Julio 08, 2011
Report
#2011-AT-1012